Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Angiogenesis in renal cell carcinoma: correlation of microvessel density and microvessel area with other prognostic factors

  • Urology – Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was aimed at evaluating the association between tumor vascularity and other known prognostic factors in different histopathological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In 41 cases of RCC, immunohistochemistry was performed using anti-CD34 antibody and Ki-67 (MIB-1). Microvessel density was estimated in an area of 0.23 mm2 representative of the highest microvessel density (“hot spot”). The microvessel area (MVA) was expressed as percentage of total tumor area occupied by vessels. Endothelial proliferation index (EPI) was determined from sections stained by Ki-67. The relationship between MVD, MVA, EPI and prognostic parameters of RCC like stage, grade and tumor cells proliferation index (TPI) was evaluated. The tumor MVA increased significantly with the higher stage of the tumor (P < 0.001) and increase in TPI (P < 0.05). The MVD, however, did not show significant correlation with grade and stage of the tumor. Microvessel area appears to be a better prognostic marker for RCC when compared to microvessel density. The increase in MVA, without increase in MVD, with increasing stage may be due to the development of larger diameter vascular channels in higher-stage tumors, and this is thought to facilitate metastasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Folkman J (1990) What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent? J Natl Cancer Inst 82:4–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee JS, Jung JJ, Kim J (2000) Quantification of angiogenesis by a computerized image analysis system in renal cell carcinoma. Analyt Quant Cytol Histol 22:469–474

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weidner N (1995) Current pathologic methods for measuring intratumoral microvessel density within breast carcinoma and other solid tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 36:169–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Delahunt B, Bethwaite PB, Thornton A (1997) Prognostic significance of microscopic vascularity for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Br J Urol 80:401–404

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Herbst C, Kosmehl H, Stiller KJ et al (1998) Evaluation of microvessel density by computerized image analysis in human renal cell carcinoma. Correlation to pT category, nuclear grade, proliferative activity and occurrence of metastasis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 124:141–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoshino S, Kato M, Okada K (1995) Prognostic significance of microvessel count in low stage renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 2:156–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nativ O, Sabo E, Reiss A et al (1998) Clinical significance of tumor angiogenesis in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma. Urology 51:693–696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. MacLennan GT, Bostwick DG (1995) Microvessel density in renal cell carcinoma: lack of prognostic significance. Urology 46:27–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C (1982) Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 6:655–663

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dinda AK, Mathur M, Saxena S et al (1998) Heat shock protein (HSP) expression and proliferation of tubular cells in end stage renal disease (ESRD) with and without haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transp 13:99–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dinda AK (1999) Application of densitometry and image cytometry in biomedical sciences. In: Wadhwa S, Dinda AK (eds) Stereology. Image processing and quantitative image analysis in biomedical research. Brain Pool Inc, Delhi, p 135

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lanigan D (1995) Prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma. Br J Urol 75:565–571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Montie JE (1994) Prognostic factors for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 152:1397–1398

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhattacharya NK, Chatterjee U, Sarkar S et al (2008) A study of proliferative activity, angiogenesis and nuclear grading in renal cell carcinoma. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 51:17–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang JC, Hawarth L, Sherry RM et al (2003) A randomized trial of bevacizumab, an antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody for metastatic renal cancer. N Engl J Med 349:427–434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Kumar Dinda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, S.G., Aggarwal, N., Gupta, S.D. et al. Angiogenesis in renal cell carcinoma: correlation of microvessel density and microvessel area with other prognostic factors. Int Urol Nephrol 43, 125–129 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-010-9779-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-010-9779-7

Keywords

Navigation