Skip to main content
Log in

CD44 expression in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is an invariable consequence of transplantation. The tubuloepithelial expression of CD44 is markedly enhanced in autoimmune renal injuries. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the effect of IRI on the expression of CD44 in rat kidney. Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats were used. The rats were divided into three groups. The rats in group 1 (n = 10) underwent laparotomy and left nephrectomy (Sham surgery). The rats in group 2 (n = 10) underwent laparotomy, 1 h renal ischemia, followed by 1 h of reperfusion and then left nephrectomy was performed. The rats in group 3 (n = 10) underwent laparotomy, 1 h renal ischemia, followed by 24 h of reperfusion and then left nephrectomy was performed. Histopathological findings and the immunohistochemical expression of CD44 in ischemic and reperfused rat kidneys were investigated. In histopathologic evaluation, non-specific changes were observed in group 2 and early phase of IRI were present in group 3. CD44 was expressed in both group 2 and 3 but not in group 1. The mean immunohistochemical staining percentages of rat kidneys in group 1, 2, and 3 were 0.00 ± 0.00, 39.90 ± 5.53, and 26.20 ± 8.38, respectively. The immunohistochemical staining pattern was more dense in group 2 than in group 3 (P < 0.001). In conclusion, the expression of CD44 in renal tubuloepithelial cells was significantly increased after IRI. The increase in CD44 expression was more prominent during the early phase of IRI and started to decline after 24 h of reperfusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kinsey GR, Li L, Okusa MD (2008) Inflammation in acute kidney injury. Nephron Exp Nephrol 109:e102–e107. doi:10.1159/000142934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kennedy SE, Erlich JH (2008) Murine renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Nephrology 13:390–396. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1797.2008.00979.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rouschop KMA, Leemans JC (2008) Ischemia-reperfusion treatment: opportunities point to modulation of the inflammatory response. Kidney Int 73:1333–1335. doi:10.1038/ki.2008.156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Heel K, Blennerhassett L, Kong SE, McCauley R, Hall J (1998) Influence of ischemia-reperfusion injury on CD44 expression in rat small intestine. Br J Surg 85:1086–1089. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00826.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Decleves AM, Caron N, Nonclercq D, Legrand A et al (2006) Dynamics of hyaluronan, CD44, and inflammatory cells in the rat kidney after ischemia-reperfusion injury. Int J Mol Med 18:83–94

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rouschop KMA, Roelofs JJTH, Claessen N, Martins PC et al (2005) Protection against renal ischemia reperfusion injury by CD44 disruption. J Am Soc Nephrol 16:2034–2043. doi:10.1681/ASN.2005010054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Poulsom R (2007) CD44 and hyaluronan help mesenchymal stem cells move to a neighborhood in need of regeneration. Kidney Int 72:389–390. doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5002398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moon C, Jeong CW, Kim H, Ahn M et al (2006) Expression of CD44 adhesion molecule in rat testis with ischemia reperfusion injury. J Vet Med Sci 68:761–764. doi:10.1292/jvms.68.761

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Screaton GR, Bell MV, Jackson DG, Cornelis FB et al (1992) Genomic structure of DNA encoding the lymphocyte homing receptor CD44 reveals at least 12 alternatively spliced exons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:12160–12164. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.24.12160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tolg C, Hofmann M, Herrlich P, Ponta H (1993) Splicing choice from ten variant exons establishes CD44 variability. Nucleic Acids Res 21:1225–1229. doi:10.1093/nar/21.5.1225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Siegelman MH, DeGrendele HC, Estess P (1999) Activation and interaction of CD44 and hyaluronan in immunological systems. J Leukoc Biol 66:315–321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weber GF, Ashkar S, Glimcher MJ, Cantor H (1996) Receptor ligand interaction between CD44 and osteopontin (Eta-1). Science 271:509–512. doi:10.1126/science.271.5248.509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roy-Chaudhury P, Khong TF, Williams JH, Haites NE et al (1996) CD44 in glomerulonephritis: expression in human renal biopsies, the Thy 1.1 model, and by cultured mesangial cells. Kidney Int 50:272–281. doi:10.1038/ki.1996.312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lewington AJ, Padanilam BJ, Martin DR, Hammerman MR (2000) Expression of CD44 in kidney after acute ischemic injury in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 278:R247–R254

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sheikh H, Isacke CM (1996) A di-hydrophobic Leu-Val motif regulates the basolateral localization of CD44 in polarized Madin Darby canine kidney epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 271:185–190. doi:10.1074/jbc.271.49.31172

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burak Kocak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kocak, B., Orug, T., Turhan, N. et al. CD44 expression in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. Int Urol Nephrol 41, 791–794 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-009-9542-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-009-9542-0

Keywords

Navigation