Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conservative management of renal masses in the elderly: our experience

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To analyse a group of patients with clinically and radiologically detected renal neoplasms who were conservatively treated for various reasons. The patients were followed-up radiologically and intervened only if symptomatic. The natural progression of these masses and also a brief review of the literature is done.

Methods

The series was collected retrospectively from the case-notes of patients coded for renal neoplasms. Of the 13 patients followed up conservatively, eight were deferred surgery in view of their age (mean age—83.25 years), one patient had a single kidney, two were unwilling for surgery and two had severe co-morbidities which made them unfit for surgery.

Results

The mean age at diagnosis was 80.4 years (median—82; range 66–88). Seven females and six males were followed up for a mean and median follow-up of 38.38 and 34 months respectively (range—19 to 105 months). Six patients died during follow-up (mean-41.57 months). The average longest dimension at diagnosis and when last reviewed were 5.01 cm and 5.57 cm. However, only one of these died due to metastasis which developed during follow-up and two had to be angio-embolised for hematuria. The average rate of growth along the longitudinal dimension was 0.17 cm/year while the average change in volume was 11.97 cc/year.

Conclusions

Malignant renal neoplasms grow at a relatively slow rate. Without tumour growth the risk of metastasis appears limited. Thus expectant management can be considered as an alternative for a selected group of patients who are either unwilling or unfit or high risk for surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Office for National Statistics (2004) Cancer statistics registrations: registrations of cancer diagnosed in 2001, England. Series MB1 no.32. National Statistics, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA (1999) Cancer statistics: 1999. CA Cancer J Clin 49:8–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Katz DL, Zheng T, Holford TR, Flannery J (1994) Time trends in the incidence of renal carcinoma: analysis of Connecticut Tumor Registry data, 1935–1989. Int J Cancer 58(1):57–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chow WH, Devesa SS, Warren JL, Fraumeni JF Jr (1999) Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA 281:1628–1631

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W (1969) The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 101(3):297–301

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee CT, Katz J, Shi W, Thaler HT, Reuter VE, Russo P (2000) Surgical management of renal tumors 4 cm. or less in a contemporary cohort. J Urol 163(3):730–736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hellsten S, Johnsen J, Berge T et al (1990) Clinically unrecognised renal cell carcinoma. Diagnostic and pathological aspects. Eur Urol suppl 18:2–3

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bosniak MA (1995) Observation of small incidentally detected renal masses. Semin Urol Oncol 13:267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bosniak MA, Birnbaum BA, Krinsky GA, Waisman J (1995) Small renal parenchymal neoplasms: further observations on growth. Radiology 197(3):589–597

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rendon RA, Stanietzky N, Panzarella T, Robinette M, Klotz LH, Thurston W, Jewett MA (2000) The natural history of small renal masses. J Urol 164(4):1143–1147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oda T, Miyao N, Takahashi A, Yanase M, Masumori N, Itoh N, Tamakawa M, Tsukamoto T (2001) Growth rates of primary and metastatic lesions of renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 8(9):473–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dekernion JB, Ramming KP, Smith RB (1978) The natural history of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a computer analysis. J Urol 120(2):148–152

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tosaka A, Ohya K, Yamada K, Ohashi H, Kitahara S, Sekine H, Takehara Y, Oka K (1990) Incidence and properties of renal masses and asymptomatic renal cell carcinoma detected by abdominal ultrasonography. J Urol 144(5):1097–1099

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Griffiths DF, Verghese A, Golash A, Kynaston HG, Matthews PN, Hart AJ, Court JB (2002) Contribution of grade, vascular invasion and age to outcome in clinically localized renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 90(1):26–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wehle MJ, Thiel DD, Petrou SP, Young PR, Frank I, Karsteadt N (2004) Conservative management of incidental contrast-enhancing renal masses as safe alternative to invasive therapy. Urology 64(1):49–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kassouf W, Aprikian AG, Laplante M, Tanguay S (2004) Natural history of renal masses followed expectantly. J Urol 171(1):111–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lamb GW, Bromwich EJ, Vasey P, Aitchison M (2004) Management of renal masses in patients medically unsuitable for nephrectomy—natural history, complications, and outcome. Urology 64(5):909–913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Volpe A, Panzarella T, Rendon RA, Haider MA, Kondylis FI, Jewett MA (2004) The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses. Cancer 100(4):738–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sowery RD, Siemens DR (2004) Growth characteristics of renal cortical tumors in patients managed by watchful waiting. Can J Urol 11(5):2407–2410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herman S. Fernando.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernando, H.S., Duvuru, S. & Hawkyard, S.J. Conservative management of renal masses in the elderly: our experience. Int Urol Nephrol 39, 203–207 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9119-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9119-0

Keywords

Navigation