Abstract
Objectives
To analyse a group of patients with clinically and radiologically detected renal neoplasms who were conservatively treated for various reasons. The patients were followed-up radiologically and intervened only if symptomatic. The natural progression of these masses and also a brief review of the literature is done.
Methods
The series was collected retrospectively from the case-notes of patients coded for renal neoplasms. Of the 13 patients followed up conservatively, eight were deferred surgery in view of their age (mean age—83.25 years), one patient had a single kidney, two were unwilling for surgery and two had severe co-morbidities which made them unfit for surgery.
Results
The mean age at diagnosis was 80.4 years (median—82; range 66–88). Seven females and six males were followed up for a mean and median follow-up of 38.38 and 34 months respectively (range—19 to 105 months). Six patients died during follow-up (mean-41.57 months). The average longest dimension at diagnosis and when last reviewed were 5.01 cm and 5.57 cm. However, only one of these died due to metastasis which developed during follow-up and two had to be angio-embolised for hematuria. The average rate of growth along the longitudinal dimension was 0.17 cm/year while the average change in volume was 11.97 cc/year.
Conclusions
Malignant renal neoplasms grow at a relatively slow rate. Without tumour growth the risk of metastasis appears limited. Thus expectant management can be considered as an alternative for a selected group of patients who are either unwilling or unfit or high risk for surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Office for National Statistics (2004) Cancer statistics registrations: registrations of cancer diagnosed in 2001, England. Series MB1 no.32. National Statistics, London
Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA (1999) Cancer statistics: 1999. CA Cancer J Clin 49:8–31
Katz DL, Zheng T, Holford TR, Flannery J (1994) Time trends in the incidence of renal carcinoma: analysis of Connecticut Tumor Registry data, 1935–1989. Int J Cancer 58(1):57–63
Chow WH, Devesa SS, Warren JL, Fraumeni JF Jr (1999) Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA 281:1628–1631
Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W (1969) The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 101(3):297–301
Lee CT, Katz J, Shi W, Thaler HT, Reuter VE, Russo P (2000) Surgical management of renal tumors 4 cm. or less in a contemporary cohort. J Urol 163(3):730–736
Hellsten S, Johnsen J, Berge T et al (1990) Clinically unrecognised renal cell carcinoma. Diagnostic and pathological aspects. Eur Urol suppl 18:2–3
Bosniak MA (1995) Observation of small incidentally detected renal masses. Semin Urol Oncol 13:267
Bosniak MA, Birnbaum BA, Krinsky GA, Waisman J (1995) Small renal parenchymal neoplasms: further observations on growth. Radiology 197(3):589–597
Rendon RA, Stanietzky N, Panzarella T, Robinette M, Klotz LH, Thurston W, Jewett MA (2000) The natural history of small renal masses. J Urol 164(4):1143–1147
Oda T, Miyao N, Takahashi A, Yanase M, Masumori N, Itoh N, Tamakawa M, Tsukamoto T (2001) Growth rates of primary and metastatic lesions of renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 8(9):473–477
Dekernion JB, Ramming KP, Smith RB (1978) The natural history of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a computer analysis. J Urol 120(2):148–152
Tosaka A, Ohya K, Yamada K, Ohashi H, Kitahara S, Sekine H, Takehara Y, Oka K (1990) Incidence and properties of renal masses and asymptomatic renal cell carcinoma detected by abdominal ultrasonography. J Urol 144(5):1097–1099
Griffiths DF, Verghese A, Golash A, Kynaston HG, Matthews PN, Hart AJ, Court JB (2002) Contribution of grade, vascular invasion and age to outcome in clinically localized renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 90(1):26–31
Wehle MJ, Thiel DD, Petrou SP, Young PR, Frank I, Karsteadt N (2004) Conservative management of incidental contrast-enhancing renal masses as safe alternative to invasive therapy. Urology 64(1):49–52
Kassouf W, Aprikian AG, Laplante M, Tanguay S (2004) Natural history of renal masses followed expectantly. J Urol 171(1):111–113
Lamb GW, Bromwich EJ, Vasey P, Aitchison M (2004) Management of renal masses in patients medically unsuitable for nephrectomy—natural history, complications, and outcome. Urology 64(5):909–913
Volpe A, Panzarella T, Rendon RA, Haider MA, Kondylis FI, Jewett MA (2004) The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses. Cancer 100(4):738–745
Sowery RD, Siemens DR (2004) Growth characteristics of renal cortical tumors in patients managed by watchful waiting. Can J Urol 11(5):2407–2410
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernando, H.S., Duvuru, S. & Hawkyard, S.J. Conservative management of renal masses in the elderly: our experience. Int Urol Nephrol 39, 203–207 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9119-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9119-0