Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of stanford pouch and ileal conduit urinary diversions on bone mineral density and metabolism

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After urinary-intestinal diversions metabolic complications may occur in long term follow up. We aimed to evaluate bone metabolism changes in urinary diverted patients. Nineteen patients with urinary diversions (11 Stanford pouch and 8 ileal conduit) performed with diagnosis of locally invasive bladder cancer and 19 age-sex matched healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. Bone mineral density (BMD), arterial blood pH, bicarbonate and base excess as well as bone mineralisation parameters at urine and serum were evaluated for all groups. For statistical evaluation, nonparametric comparisons between groups were used. Comparison of ileal conduit and control groups displayed higher alkaline phosphatase and parathormone levels in the patient group though the difference was not significant. The mean BMD values of ileal conduit group were osteopenic, revealing a significant difference with the control group. Statistically significant differences between alkaline phosphatase, parathormone levels of Stanford pouch and control groups were apparent whereas BMD values were not significantly different. When the two patient groups were compared with each other, no difference in BMD or bone metabolism parameter values could be observed. Patients with urinary diversions are under risk of bone demineralisation and must be followed by BMDs, arterial blood analysis and bone mineral metabolism parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mc Dougal WS (1992). Metabolic complications of urinary intestinal diversion. J Urol 147: 1199–1208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kristjansson A, Davidsson T and Mansson W (1997). Metabolic alterations at different levels of renal function following continent urinary diversion through colonic segments. J Urol 157: 2099–2103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hall MC, Koch MO and Mc Dougal WS (1991). Metabolic consequence of urinary diversion through intestinal segments. Urol Clin North Am 18: 725–735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gerharz EW, Turner WH and Kalble T (2003). Metabolic and functional consequences of urinary reconstruction with bowel. BJU Int 91: 143–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Koch MO and Mc Dougal WS (1985). The pathophysiology of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis after urinary diversion through intestinal segments. Surgery 98: 561–570

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Minervini R, Felipetto R and Cecchi M (1995). Densitometric and biochemical alterations in bony tissue induced by ureterosigmoidostomy. Urol Int 54: 217–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mc Dougal WS and Koch MO (1998). Bony demineralization following urinary intestinal diversion. J Urol 140: 853–855

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kanis AJ. Osteoporosis Oxford Blackwell Science 1--22.

  9. Koch MO and Mc Dougal WS (1998). Bone demineralisation following ureterosigmoid anastomosis: an experimental study in rats. J Urol 140: 856–859

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mills RD and Studer UE (1999). Metabolic consequences of continent urinary diversion. J Urol 161: 1057–1066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McDougal WS (1998). Use of intestinal segments and urinary diversion. In: Walsh, PC, Retik, AB, Vaughan, ED and Wein, AJ (eds) Campbell’s Urology, pp 3121–3161. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  12. Studer UE, Springer J, Casanova GA, Gurtner F, Zingg EJ. Correlation between the length of ileum used for a bladder substitute and metabolic acidosis, functional capacity and urinary continence. J Urol 1991; 145: 138A, abstract 423

    Google Scholar 

  13. Golomb J, Klutke CG and Raz S (1989). Complications of bladder substitution and continent urinary diversion. Urology 34: 329–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Studer UE, Merz VW, Ritter EP, Lüscher D, Turner WH, Garros K, Rösler H. Metabolic adaptation of small bowel when used for an ileal bladder substitute. The 18F-FDG absorption test. J Urol 1994; 151: 500A, abstract 1092

    Google Scholar 

  15. Philipson BM, Kock NG, Höckenström Norlen T LJ, Ahren C and Hansson HA (1986). Ultrastructual and histochemical changes in ileal reservoir mucosa after long-term exposure to urine. A study in patients with continent urostomy (Kock pouch). Scand J Gastroenterol 21: 1235–1237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Giannini S, Nobile M and Sartori L (1997). Bone density and skeletal metabolism in patients with orthotopic ileal neobladder. J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 1553–1559

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Poulsen AL, Overgaard K, Christiansen C, Thode J, Steven K. Bone mineral status following urinary diversion with the ileal Kock reservoir. EAU Xth Congress 1992; Abstracts 411: 335

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kawakita M, Arai Y and Shigeno C (1996). Bone demineralization following urinary intestinal diversion assessed by urinary pyridinium cross-links and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Urol 156: 355–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Davidsson T, Lindergard B, Obrant K and Mansson W (1995). Long-term metabolic effects of urinary diversion on skeletal bone: histomorphometric and mineralogic analysis. Urology 46(3): 328–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Campanello M, Herlitz H and Lindstedt G (1996). Bone mineral and related biochemical variables in patients with Kock ileal reservoir or Bricker conduit for urinary diversion. J Urol 155: 1209–1213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tschopp ABS, Lippuner K, Jaeger P, Merz VW, Danuser H and Studer UE (1996). No evidence of osteopenia 5–8 years after ileal orthotopic bladder substitution. J Urol 155: 71–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nazmi Incel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Incel, N., Incel, N.A., Uygur, M.C. et al. Effect of stanford pouch and ileal conduit urinary diversions on bone mineral density and metabolism. Int Urol Nephrol 38, 447–451 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-005-8435-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-005-8435-0

Keywords

Navigation