Skip to main content
Log in

Renal transplant recipients over aged 60 have diminished immune activity and a low risk of rejection

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Strict consideration of the renal transplant candidate’s chronologic age is generally supplanted by more subjective reflection on his (her) physiologic state. In the US, patients over 64 years old represented 9.0% of renal transplant recipients in the year 2000, yet little prior experience is available with which to guide the management of geriatric patients. Two hundred and forty six consecutive recipients of primary kidney transplants at the Yale–New Haven Organ Transplant Center between 1990 and 1995 were included in an outcome analysis. Age at transplantation ranged from 2 to 68 years; the study group consisted of the 16 (6.5%) over age 60. The immunosuppressive protocol was uniform for all patients. There was a disproportionately high use of cadaveric organs by older patients; only 1/16 (6.3%) received a living donor kidney. The overall rate of rejection within the first 90 days was 6.7% of cadaveric recipients over 60 versus 37.6% of younger recipients, P=0.001. Actual patient survival rates at 6 years were 100% of patients younger than 11 years versus 69% (11/16) of those older than 60 years. Death censored 5 year graft survival was 100% in older patients versus 85% among the younger patients. The older and younger patients received quantitatively equivalent immunosuppression, but acute rejection was uncommon in the former (6%) versus the younger cohort (34%). It seems logical to consider whether older renal transplant recipients may benefit from a less aggressive immunosuppression strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • RJ Wood MJ Jurkiewica (1994) Plastic and reconstructive surgery Si Schwartz GT Shires FC Spencer (Eds) Principles of Surgery EditionNumber6 McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • CB Mendoza SuffixJr RW Postlethwait WD Johnson (1970) ArticleTitleIncidence of wound disruption following operation. Arch Surg 101 396–398

    Google Scholar 

  • F Yao S Visovatti CS Johnson et al. (2001) ArticleTitleAge and growth factors in porcine full-thickness wound healing Wound Repair Reg 9 IssueID5 371

    Google Scholar 

  • DR Thomas (2001) ArticleTitleAge-related changes in wound healing Drugs Aging 18 IssueID8 607

    Google Scholar 

  • MJ Bia (1999) ArticleTitleGeriatric issues in renal transplantation. Geriatric Neph Urol 9 109–113

    Google Scholar 

  • 2000 Annual report of the U.S. scientific registry of transplant recipients and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network: transplant data 1989–1998.

  • U.S. Renal Data System, USRDS 2001 annual data report: atlas of end-stage renal disease in the United States, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, 2001.

  • CA Vivas DP Hickey ML Jordan et al. (1992) ArticleTitleRenal transplantation in patients 65 years old or older J Urol 147 IssueID4 990

    Google Scholar 

  • BD Kahan SM Stepkowski KL Napoli et al. (2001) The development of Sirolimus: the University of Texas-Houston experience JM Cecka PI Terasaki (Eds) Clinical Transplants 2000 UCLA Immunogenetics Center Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • A Moss JS Najarian DER Sutherland et al. (2001) 5,000 kidney transplants–a single-center experience JM Cecka PI Terasaki (Eds) Clinical transplants 2000 UCLA Immunogenetics Center Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • KJ Rodysill L Hansen JJ O’Leary (1989) ArticleTitleCutaneous-delayed hypersensitivity in nursing home and geriatric clinic patients: implications for the tuberculin test J Am Geriatr Soc 37 435

    Google Scholar 

  • JE McElhaney GS Meneilly BL Beattie et al. (1992) ArticleTitleThe effect of influenza vaccination on IL-1 production in healthy elderly–implications for current vaccination practices J Gerontol 47 M3

    Google Scholar 

  • R Aspinall (2000) ArticleTitleLongevity and the immune response Biogerontology 1 273

    Google Scholar 

  • S Rajagopalan TT Yoshikawa (2000) ArticleTitleTuberculosis in the elderly Z Gerontol Geriatr 33 374

    Google Scholar 

  • RA Wolfe VB Ashby EL Milford et al. (1999) ArticleTitleComparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Eng J Med 341 IssueID23 1725–1730

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy L. Friedman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, A.L., Goker, O., Kalish, M.A. et al. Renal transplant recipients over aged 60 have diminished immune activity and a low risk of rejection. Int Urol Nephrol 36, 451–456 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-004-8685-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-004-8685-2

Keywords

Navigation