Skip to main content
Log in

Citizen science reveals widespread supplementary feeding of African woolly-necked storks in suburban areas of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

African woolly-necked storks (Ciconia microscelis) depend on wetland habitats for foraging and nesting in natural environments. Recently, they have started colonising urban environments in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, and are now a common sight in suburban areas in particular. There have been some anecdotal reports on supplementary feeding of this species by households in some urban areas where they are common. However, these reports have never been confirmed and therefore the extent of feeding and lack thereof is unknown. Using a questionnaire survey, we therefore investigated the extent (if any) to which householders in urban and suburban areas of KwaZulu-Natal provide supplementary food to African woolly-necked storks. We also determined the feeders’ provisioning habits, and identified the motivation behind and attitudes toward feeding. We found that a significant number of householders fed African woolly-necked storks on a daily basis throughout the year. The majority of respondents provided meat while others provided inappropriate food such as bread. Respondents were most often motivated to feed for personal pleasure. Our results showed that this species is successfully utilising and exploiting anthropogenic food – a novel behaviour. The observations and narratives from respondents strongly suggest that the African woolly-necked stork is present throughout the year, contrary to the perception that this species is migratory during winter. Based on the results obtained in this study, supplementary feeding of African woolly-necked stork by householders is relatively common, widespread and established in suburban areas of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. However, reported inappropriate feeding may create concerns regarding the health status of African woolly-necked storks in urban population. Therefore, to prevent further detrimental effects and potential human-wildlife conflicts we recommend that suitable feeding guidelines be formulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan DG (2012) The waterbirds of Durban Bay: current and historical population trends. Novitates 35:1–78

    Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International (2017) Ciconia episcopus, in: IUCN 2017. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017. Version 2017.2 www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 03 August 2017

  • Bonnington C, Gaston KJ, Evans KL (2015) Ecological traps and behavioural adjustments of urban songbirds to fine-scale spatial variation in predator activity. Anim Conserv 16:529–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clancey PA (1964) The birds of Natal and Zululand. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox DTC, Gaston KJ (2016) Urban bird feeding: connecting people with nature. PLoS One 11:e0158717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cyrus D, Robson N (1980) Bird Atlas of Natal. University of Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg

    Google Scholar 

  • del Hoyo J, Collar N, Garcia EFJ (2017) African woolly-neck (Ciconia microscelis). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, de Juana E (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. https://www.hbw.com/species/african-woollyneck-ciconia-microscelis. Accessed 03 August 2017

  • Djerdali S, Guerrero-Casado J, Tortosa FS (2016) Food from dumps increases the reproductive value of last laid eggs in the white stork Ciconia ciconia. Bird Study 63:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewen JG, Walker L, Canessa S, Groombridge JJ (2015) Improving supplementary feeding in species conservation. Conserv Biol 29:341–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith JA, Beggs JR, Jones DN, McNaughton EJ, Krull CR, Stanley MC (2014) Risks and drivers of wild bird feeding in urban areas of New Zealand. Biol Conserv 180:64–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith JA, Beggs JR, Jones D, Stanely MC (2015) Supplementary feeding restructures urban bird communities. PNAS 112:2648–2657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Fuller RA, Loram A, MacDonald C, Power S, Dempsey N (2007) Urban domestic gardens (XI): variation in urban wildlife gardening in the United Kingdom. Biodivers Conserv 16:3227–3238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert NI, Correia RA, Silva JP, Pacheco C, Catry I, Atkinson PW, Gill JA, Franco AM (2016) Are white storks addicted to junk food? Impacts of landfill use on the movement and behaviour of resident white storks (Ciconia ciconia) from a partially migratory population. Mov Ecol 4:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillanders R, Awasthy M, Jones DN (2017) Extreme dietary switching: widespread consumption of meat by rainbow lorikeets at garden bird feeders in Australia. Corella 41:32–36

    Google Scholar 

  • González LM, Margalida A, Sánchez R, Oria J (2006) Supplementary feeding as an effective tool for improving breeding success in the Spanish imperial eagle (Aquila adalberti). Biol Conserv 129:477–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanmer HJ, Thomas RL, Fellowes MDE (2016) Provision of supplementary food for wild birds may increase the risk of local nest predation. Ibis 159:158–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilgartner R, Stahl D, Zinner D (2014) Impact of supplementary feeding on reproductive success of white storks. PLoS One 9:e104276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Howard P, Jones DN (2004) A quantitative study of wildlife feeding in south-East Queensland. In: Burger SK, Lunney D (eds) Urban Wildlife: More than meets the eye. R. Zool. Soc. New South Wales, Mosman, pp 55–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ishigame G, Baxter GS (2007) Practice and attitudes of suburban and rural dwellers to feeding wild birds in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Ornithol Sci 6:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DN (2011) An appetite for connection: why we need to understand the effect and value of feeding wild birds. Emu 111:i–vii

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DN, Reynolds SJ (2008) Feeding birds in our towns and cities: a global research opportunity. J Avian Biol 39:265–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J, French K, Major R (2010) Population and breeding trends of an urban coloniser: the Australian white ibis. Wildl Res 37:230–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, McGowan KJ, Donnelly R, Knight RL (2001) Causes and consequences of expanding American crow populations. In Marzluff J, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Springer, Boston, pp 331–363

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson SC, Brown M, Downs CT (2016a) Diet of the crowned eagle (Stephanoaetus coronatus) in an urban landscape: potential for human-wildlife conflict? Urban Ecosyst 19:383–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson SC, Brown M, Downs CT (2016b) Crowned eagle nest sites in an urban landscape: requirements of a large eagle in the Durban metropolitan open space system. Landsc Urban Plan 146:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murgui E, Hedblom M (2017) Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary R, Jones DN (2006) The use of supplementary foods by Australian magpies Gymnorhina tibicen: implications for wildlife feeding in suburban environments. Austral Ecol 31:208–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orros ME, Fellowes MDE (2014) Supplementary feeding of the reintroduced red kite Milvus milvus in UK gardens. Bird Study 61:260–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orros ME, Fellowes MD (2015) Widespread supplementary feeding in domestic gardens explains the return of reintroduced red kites Milvus milvus to an urban area. Ibis 157:230–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer KE, Siriwardena GM, Conway GJ, Risely K, Toms MP (2015) Is supplementary feeding in gardens a driver of evolutionary change in a migratory bird species? Glob Chang Biol 21:4353–4363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy D, Kibuule M (2017) Increasingly urban marabou storks start breeding four months early in Kampala, Uganda. Ostrich 88:261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds SJ, Galbraith JA, Smith JA, Jones DN (2017) Garden bird feeding: insights and prospects from a north-south comparison of this global urban phenomenon. Front Ecol Evol 5:24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollinson DJ, O'Leary R, Jones DN (2003) The practice of wildlife feeding in suburban Brisbane. Corella 27:52–58

    Google Scholar 

  • SABAP2 (2018) Ciconia episcopus. Version 2018.2 www.sabap2.adu.org.za. Accessed 12 March 2018

  • Singh P, Downs CT (2016) Hadedas in the hood: hadeda ibis activity in suburban neighbourhoods of Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Urban Ecosyst 19:1283–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics South Africa (2007). Community survey 2007 (revised version). Statistical Release P0301 Downloaded on 24 October 2017

  • Van den Bossche W, Berthold P, Kaatz M, Nowak E, Querner U (2002) Eastern European white stork populations: migration studies and elaboration of conservation measures. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn

  • Weatherhead PJ (1979) Behavioral implications of the defense of a shoveler brood by common eiders. Conder 81:427–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcoxen TE, Horn DJ, Hogan BM, Hubble CN, Huber SJ, Flamm J, Knott M, Lundstrom L, Salik F, Wassenhove SJ, Wrobel ER (2015) Effects of bird-feeding activities on the health of wild birds. Conserv Physiol 3:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to numerous members of the public who kindly replied to our sighting request and those who completed our questionnaire. Special thanks to MM Zungu and MB Khambule for their valuable input on the manuscript. We thank the University of KwaZulu-Natal, the National Research Foundation (ZA) and the Rufford Foundation (GB) for funding. We also thank Idea Wild (US) for donating binoculars and a laptop. We thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that greatly improved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colleen T. Downs.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thabethe, V., Downs, C.T. Citizen science reveals widespread supplementary feeding of African woolly-necked storks in suburban areas of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Urban Ecosyst 21, 965–973 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0774-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0774-6

Keywords

Navigation