Abstract
The classic urban-rural gradient concept assumes a decline in land use intensity from an intensively developed urban core outward to residential suburbs, culminating in lightly developed rural areas. The concept provides a common framework directing urban socio-ecological research. Given that rural land use includes woodlands and croplands, and croplands appear as ecologically depauperate as urban lands, we investigated land-use patterns along urban-rural gradients for 30 large metropolitan areas in the eastern United States. We predicted a bifurcation at the rural end of the gradient between woodland and cropland land use that does not correspond with human population density (expected to be relatively low in rural areas regardless of land use type). Our data indicated that ‘rural’ was a poor substitute for ‘natural’ as the rural end of the gradients bifurcated at the rural end between woodland and cropland – croplands being demonstratively poor ecological habitats. Indeed, we found that when defined by habitat quality, the habitat known to be biotically homogenized (urban and cropland) remained steady along the urban-rural gradient. Our results do not undermine the utility of the urban-rural gradient framework, but do suggest that the gradient and/or human population density do not necessarily indicate shifts in habitat quality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alpert P, Bone E, Holzapfel C (2000) Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 3:52–66
Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6(2):506–519. https://doi.org/10.2307/2269387
Blair RB (1999) Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity? Ecol Appl 9(1):164–170.
Census (2013) American FactFinder. In: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau. 2013
Conner RC, Hartsell AJ (2002) Forest area and conditions. In: Wear DN, Greis JG (eds) Southern resource assessment. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Asheville, pp 347–401
Cordell HK, Macie EA (2002) Population and demographic trends. In: Macie EA, Hermansen LA (eds) Human influences on forest ecosystems: the southern wildland-urban interface assessment. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Asheville, pp 11–34
Cramer VA, Hobbs RJ, Standish RJ (2008) What’s new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends Ecol Evol 23(2):104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.005
Czech B, Krausman PR, Devers PK (2000) Economic associations among cause of species endangerment in the United States. Bioscience 50(7):593–601.
Dupouey JL, Dambrine E, Laffite JD et al (2002) Irreversible impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity. Ecology 83:2978–2984
Evans KL (2010) Individual species and urbanisation. In: Gaston KJ (ed) Urban ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Francis CA, Hansen TE, Fox AA, Hesje PJ, Nelson HE, Lawseth AE, English A (2012) Farmland conversion to non-agricultural uses in the US and Canada: current impacts and concerns for the future. Int J Agric Sustain 10(1):8–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2012.649588
Gámez-Virués S, Perović DJ, Gossner MM, Börschig C, Blüthgen N, de Jong H, Simons NK, Klein AM, Krauss J, Maier G, Scherber C, Steckel J, Rothenwöhrer C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Weiner CN, Weisser W, Werner M, Tscharntke T, Westphal C (2015) Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization. Nat Commun 6:8568. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9568
Gaston KJ (2010) Urbanization. In: Gaston KJ (ed) Urban ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hendrickx F, Maelfait JP, van Wingerden W et al (2007) How landscape structure, land-use intensity and habitat diversity affect components of total arthropod diversity in agricultural landscapes. J Appl Ecol 44(2):340–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01270.x
Holechek JL (2013) Global trends in population, energy use and climate: implications for policy development, rangeland management and rangeland users. Rangel J 35(2):117–129. https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ12077
Hurlbert SH, Lombardi CM (2009) Final collapse of the Newman-Pearson decision theoretic framework and the rise of the neoFisherian. Ann Zool Fenn 46(5):311–349. https://doi.org/10.5735/086.046.0501
Koerner B, Klopatek J (2010) Carbon fluxes and nitrogen availability along an urba-rural gradient in a desert landscape. Urban Ecosystems 13(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-009-0105-z
Lososová Z, Chytry´ M, Tichy´ L et al (2012) Biotic homogenization of Central European urban floras depends on residence time of alien species and habitat types. Biol Conserv 145(1):179–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.003
Luck GW (2007) A review of the relationships between human population density and biodiversity. Biol Rev 82(4):607–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00028.x
Luck GW, Smallbone LT (2010) Species diversity and urbanisation: patterns, drivers, implications. In: Gaston K (ed) Urban ecology. Cambridge Univesity Press, Cambridge
McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK (2008) The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions. Landsc Ecol 23(10):1143–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9253-4
McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (1990) Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71(4):1232–1237. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938259
McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127(3):247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005
McKinney M (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems 11(2):161–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4
Paini DR, Sheppard AW, Cook DC, de Barro PJ, Worner SP, Thomas MB (2016) Global threat to agriculture from invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(27):7575–7579. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602205113
R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Raciti SM, Hutyra LR, Finzi AC (2012) Inconsistent definitions of ‘urban’ result in different conclusions about the size of urban carbon and nitrogen stocks. Ecol Appl 22(3):1015–1035. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1250.1
Ramalho CE, Hobbs RJ (2012) Time for a change: dynamic urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 27(3):179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.10.008
Ramankutty N, Foley JA (1999) Estimating historical changes in global land cover: croplands from 1700 to 1992. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 13(4):997–1027. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GB900046
Seto KC, Guneralp B, Hutyra LR (2012) Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:16083–16088
Theobald DM (2001) Land-use dynamics beyond the American urban fringe. Geogr Rev 91(3):544–564. https://doi.org/10.2307/3594740
U.S. Forest Service (2016) i-Tree. v5.x edn. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
United Nations (2014) Department of economic and social affairs, population division. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352)
Vellend M, Verheyen K, Flinn KM et al (2007) Homogenization of forest plant communities and weakening of species–environment relationships via agricultural land use. J Ecol 95:565–573
Wandl DIA, Nadin V, Zonneveld W et al (2014) Beyond urban–rural classifications: Characterising and mapping territories-in-between across Europe. Landsc Urban Plan 130:50–63
Wear DN (2002) Land use. In: Wear DN and Greis JG (eds) Southern forest resource assessment. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Asheville, pp. 153–173
Whittaker RH (1956) Vegetation of the great Smoky Mountains. Ecol Monogr 26(1):1–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943577
Whittaker RH (1978) Direct gradient analysis. In: Whittaker RH (ed) Ordination of plant communities. Junk, The Hague
Zonum Solutions (2016) Google earth to shapefile. Zonum Solutions
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Rhudwan Nihlawi for assistance with data collection and Charlie Nilon and an anonymous reviewer for helpful suggestions for the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 20 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Warren, R.J., Reed, K., Olejnizcak, M. et al. Rural land use bifurcation in the urban-rural gradient. Urban Ecosyst 21, 577–583 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0734-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0734-1