Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Foraging and habitat use of eastern cottontails (Sylvilagus floridanus) in an urban landscape

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban landscapes such as college campuses, arboretums, and backyards provide excellent habitats for education and research into animal behavior. We investigated aspects of the foraging activity of free-ranging Eastern cottontails (Sylvilagus floridanus) on the campuses of the University of Illinois at Chicago and Lawrence University. We used giving-up densities (GUD) to test for habitat selection and patch-use behavior by cottontails inhabiting an urban landscape with a gradient of shrub and tree cover. In addition, we used small garden fences around feeding trays to test their effect as obstacles to the foraging of cottontails. Foraging activity was significantly higher under cover than in the open. GUDs were significantly lower in proximity to cover; in addition, shrubs were preferred over low-laying trees as the source of cover. Camera trap photos revealed solitary foraging, highest in the late afternoon and early morning. We demonstrated that surrounding a food patch with 3 or 4 fences increased the cottontails’ GUDs. Similar to natural habitats, urban landscapes offer heterogeneous environments that force their inhabitants to allocate their foraging activity according to their perceived stresses. Studying effect of habitat complexity on foraging responses provides useful tools to study ecological interactions and can help minimize the damage that cottontails cause within urban environments such as city parks and private gardens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu Baker MA, Brown JS (2009) Patch area, substrate depth, and richness affect giving-up densities: a test with mourning doves and cottontail rabbits. Oikos 118:1721–1731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu Baker MA, Brown JS (2010) Islands of fear: effects of wooded patches on habitat suitability of the striped mouse in a South African grassland. Funct Ecol 24:1313–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu Baker MA, Emerson SE, Brown JS (2015) Studying foraging ecology on school and college campuses: a practical guide to measuring foraging behavior using urban wildlife. Am Biol Teach (in press)

  • Althoff DA, Storm GL, Dewalle DR (1997) Daytime habitat selection by cottontails in central Pennsylvania. J Wildl Manag 61:450–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedoya-Perez MA, Carthey AJR, Mella VSA, McArthur C, Banks PB (2013) A practical guide to avoid giving up on giving-up densities. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1541–1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertolino S, Perrone A, Gola L, Viterbi R (2011) Population density and habitat use of the introduced eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) compared to the native European hare (Lepus europaeus). Zool Stud 50:315–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock CE, Jones ZF, Bock JH (2006) Abundance of cottontails (Sylvilagus) in an exurbanizing southwestern savanna. Southwest Nat 51:352–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond BT, Leopold BD, Burger LW Jr, Godwin KD (2001) Movements and home range dynamics of cottontail rabbits in Mississippi. J Wildl Manag 65:1004–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers MA, Breland B (1996) Foraging of gray squirrels on an urban–rural gradient: use of the GUD to assess anthropogenic impact. Ecol Appl 6:1135–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers MA, Jefferson JL, Kuebler MG (1993) Variation in giving-up densities of foraging chipmunks (Tamias striatus) and squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis). Oikos 66:229–236

  • Brown JS (1988) Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Kotler BP (2004) Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecol Lett 7:999–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman JA, Hockman JG, Ojeda MM (1980) Sylvilagus floridanus. Mamm Species 36:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover MR (2010) Resolving human-wildlife conflicts: the science of wildlife damage management. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox EW, Garrott RA, Cary JR (1997) Effect of supplemental cover on survival of snowshoe hares and cottontail rabbits in patchy habitat. Can J Zool 75:1357–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craven SR (1994) Cottontail rabbits. In: Hygnstrom SE, Timm RM, Larson GE (eds) Prevention and control of wildlife damage. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, pp D75–D80

  • Ditchkoff SS, Saalfeld ST, Gibson CJ (2006) Animal behavior in urban ecosystems: modifications due to human-induced stress. Urban Ecosyst 9:5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson SE, Brown JS, Linden JD (2011) Identifying Sykes’ monkeys’, Cercopithecus albogularis erythrarchus, axes of fear through patch use. Anim Behav 81:455–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman RS, Smith AT (2005) Order Lagomorpha. In: Wilson DE, Reeder DM (eds) Mammal species of the world, 3rd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, p 209–210

  • Hughes JJ, Ward D (1993) Predation risk and distance to cover affect foraging behavior in Namib Desert gerbils. Anim Behav 46:1243–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt VM, Magle SB, Vargas C, Brown AW, Lonsdorf EV, Sacerdote AB, Sorley EJ, Santymire RM (2014) Survival, abundance, and capture rate of eastern cottontail rabbits in an urban park. Urban Ecosyst 17:547–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton JL, Graham CH (2010) Using behavioral landscape ecology to predict species’ responses to land-use and climate change. Biol Conserv 143:1342–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1998) Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive and ecological perspectives. Adv Study Behav 27:215–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Valone TJ, Caraco T (1985) Foraging-effeciency-predation-risk trade-off in the grey squirrel. Anim Behav 33:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi L, Fernández N, Moreno S (2007) Habitat use and spatial behaviour in the European rabbit in three Mediterranean environments. Basic Appl Ecol 8:453–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messmer TA (2009) Human–wildlife conflicts: emerging challenges and opportunities. Hum Wildl Confl 3:10–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey PS, Gese EM, Gehrt S (2007) Spatial and temporal variation in the diet of coyotes in the Chicago metropolitan area. Am Midl Nat 158:147–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris DW, Davidson DL (2000) Optimally foraging mice match patch use with habitat differences in fitness. Ecology 81:2061–2066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris DW, Kotler BP, Brown JS, Sundararaj V, Ale S (2009) Behavioural indicators for conserving mammal diversity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1162:334–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (2003) Win-win ecology: how the earth’s species can survive in the midst of human enterprise. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shochat E, Lerman SB, Katti M, Lewis DB (2004) Linking optimal foraging behavior to bird community structure in an urban-desert landscape: field experiments with artificial food patches. Am Nat 164:232–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DF, Litvaitis JA (1999) Differences in eye size and predator-detection distances of New England and eastern cottontails. Northeast Wildl 54:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DF, Litvaitis JA (2000) Foraging strategies of sympatric lagomorphs: implications for differential success in fragmented landscapes. Can J Zool 78:2134–2141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GC, Prickett AJ, Cowan DP (2007) Costs and benefits of rabbit control options at the local level. Int J Pest Manag 53:317–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Brown JS, Ydenberg RC (2007) Foraging: behaviour and ecology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swihart RK, Yahner RH (1982) Habitat features influencing use of farmstead shelterbelts by eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus). Am Midl Nat 107:411–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorson JM, Morgan RA, Brown JS, Norman JE (1998) Direct and indirect cues of predatory risk and patch use by fox squirrels and thirteen-lined ground squirrels. Behav Ecol 9:151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trent TT, Rongstad OS (1974) Home range and survival of cottontail rabbits in southwestern Wisconsin. J Wildl Manag 38:459–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidus Rosin A, Meriggi A, Serrano Perez S (2010) Density and habitat requirements of introduced Eastern cottontail Sylvilagus floridanus in northern Italy. Acta Theriol 55:139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler HC, Hik DS (2014) Giving-up densities and foraging behaviour indicate possible effects of shrub encroachment on arctic ground squirrels. Anim Behav 95:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams CK, Davey CC, Moore RJ, Hinds LA, Silvers LE, Kerr PJ, French N, Hood GM, Pech RP, Krebs CJ (2007) Population responses to sterility imposed on female European rabbits. J Appl Ecol 44:291–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staff of the greenhouse at UIC for providing access to the study site. Many thanks to all members of J. S. Brown’s lab and the LU Biology Department, who provided helpful suggestions and assistance during the fieldwork. We also thank Emily Hjalmarson, Emily Schmidt, Kwaku Sarpong, and Nathan Ryan for their assistance with field work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar

    Mohammad A. Abu Baker

  2. Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institute for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boker, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, 84990, Israel

    Sara E. Emerson

  3. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA

    Joel S. Brown

Authors
  1. Mohammad A. Abu Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sara E. Emerson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joel S. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad A. Abu Baker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abu Baker, M.A., Emerson, S.E. & Brown, J.S. Foraging and habitat use of eastern cottontails (Sylvilagus floridanus) in an urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst 18, 977–987 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0463-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0463-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation