Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urbanization promotes non-native woody species and diverse plant assemblages in the New York metropolitan region

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid urbanization of the world has significant ecological consequences that shape global biodiversity patterns. The plant communities now common in urban centers may represent new habitats with unique dynamics and the potential for highly modified ecological services. This study, joining extensive spatial and floristic data sets, examined current distribution patterns of non-native and native woody plant species in the New York metropolitan region, USA. We joined the New York Metropolitan Flora (NYMF) database of woody species with GIS data of urban land cover for 297 5 km by 5 km landscape blocks. We tested the relationship between urbanization and native and non-native species richness patterns, the extent of non-native species presence in the urban area, and the change in beta diversity across a gradient of urban land cover. We found that across the urban–rural gradient, native plant species richness decreased and non-native species richness increased with increasing urban land cover. Total richness does not change across the urban–rural gradient. Our analyses show that these patterns are highly correlated with urbanization, but vary across the New Jersey landscape. We also found an increase in beta diversity with urbanization; urban areas are not homogenized in plant species composition compared to rural areas. Here we show a species-rich flora dominated by non-native species which are differentiating the urban flora. These results can help guide appropriate conservation decisions for the maintenance of plant biodiversity in cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronson MFJ, La Sorte FA, Nilon CH, Katti M, Goddard MA, Lepczyk CA, Warren PS, Williams NSG, Cilliers S, Clarkson B, Dobbs C, Dolan R, Hedblom M, Klotz S, Louwe Kooijmans J, Kühn I, MacGregor-Fors I, McDonnell M, Mörtberg U, Pyšek P, Siebert S, Sushinsky J, Werner P, Winter M (2014) A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc R Soc B 281:20133330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgewater PB (1990) The role of synthetic vegetation in present and future landscapes of Australia. Proc Ecol Soc Aust 16:129–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton ML, Samuelson LJ, Pan S (2005) Riparian woody plant diversity and forest structure along an urban–rural gradient. Urban Ecosyst 8:93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chocholoušková Z, Pyšek P (2003) Changes in composition and structure of urban flora over 120 years: a case study of the city of Plzeň. Flora 198:366–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemants SE, Moore G (2003) Patterns of species diversity in eight Northeastern United States cities. Urban Habitats 1:4–16, Available at http://www.urbanhabitats.org/v01n01/speciesdiversity_full.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutschewitz K, Lausch A, Kühn I, Klotz S (2003) Native and alien plant species richness in relation to spatial heterogeneity on a regional scale in Germany. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:299–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin M-J, James PMA, MacKenzie A, Melles SJ, Rayfield B (2012) Spatial statistics, spatial regression, and graph theory in ecology. Spat Stat 1:100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert OL (1989) The ecology of urban habitats. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CR, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hahs AK, McDonnell MJ, McCarthy MA, Vesk PA, Corlett RT, Norton BA, Clemants SE, Duncan RP, Thompson K, Schwartz MW, Williams NSG (2009) A global synthesis of plant extinction rates in urban areas. Ecol Lett 12:1165–1173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Handel SN (2013) Ecological restoration foundations to designing habitats in urban areas. In: Beardsley J (ed) Designing wildlife habitats. Garden and Landscape Studies, Dumbarton Oaks Research Library, Washington, D.C., pp 169–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (2004) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs F, Stoops N (2002) Demographic trends in the 20th Century. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Special Reports, Series CENSR-4, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

  • Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JJ, Klink CA, Lugo AE, Norton D, Ojima D, Richardson DM, Sandersonj EW, Valladares F, Vilà M, Samora R, Sobel M (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp S, Kühn I, Stolle J, Klotz S (2010) Changes in the functional composition of a Central European urban flora over three centuries. Perspect Plant Ecol 12:235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I (1995) On the role of alien species in urban flora and vegetation. In: Pyšek J, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, pp 85–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I, von der Lippe M, Cierjacks A (2013) Prevalence of alien versus native species of woody plants in Berlin differs between habitats and at different scales. Preslia 85:113–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühn I, Klotz S (2006) Urbanization and homogenization – comparing the floras of urban and rural areas in Germany. Biol Conserv 127:292–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühn I, Brandl R, Klotz S (2004) The flora of German cities is naturally species rich. Evol Ecol Res 6:749–764

    Google Scholar 

  • La Sorte FA, McKinney ML, Pyšek P (2007) Compositional similarity among urban floras within and across continents: biogeographical consequences of human-mediated biotic interchange. Glob Chang Biol 13:913–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Sorte FA, McKinney ML, Pyšek P, Klotz S, Rapson GL, Celesti-Grapow L, Thompson K (2008) Distance decay of similarity among European urban floras: the impact of anthropogenic activities on β diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:363–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop R (2004) Measuring land use change in New Jersey: land use update to year 2000. CRSSA Publication #17-2004-1. Center for Remote Sensing & Spatial Analysis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichstein JW, Simons TR, Shriner SA, Franzreb KE (2002) Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecol Monogr 72:445–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, McKinney ML (2001) Biotic homogenization: the loss of diversity through invasion and extinction. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martine G (2007) State of the world population: unleashing the potential of urban growth. United Nations Population Fund. Available at http://www.unfpa.org/swp/swpmain.htm

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Medford MJ (1999) PC-ORD for windows: multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 4.10. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon

  • McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK (2008) The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions. Landsc Ecol 23:1143–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA, Groffman P, Bohlen P, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Parmelee RW, Carreiro MM, Medley K (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban–rural gradient. Urban Ecosyst 1:21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2002a) Do human activities raise species richness? Contrasting patterns in United States plants and fishes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 11:343–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2002b) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2004a) Measuring floristic homogenization by non-native plants in North America. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 13:47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2004b) Citizens as propagules for exotic plants: measurement and management implications. Weed Technol 18:1480–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14:450–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melles SJ (2005) Urban bird diversity as an indicator of human social diversity and economic inequality in Vancouver, British Columbia. Urban Habitats 3:25–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Evol 20:430–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore G, Steward A, Clemants S, Glenn S, Ma J (2003) An overview of the New York Metropolitan Flora project. Urban Habitats 1:17–24, Available at: http://www.urbanhabitats.org/v01n01/nymf_full.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers JH, Bazely DR (2003) Ecology and control of introduced plants. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olden JP, Poff NL, McKinney ML (2006) Forecasting faunal and floral homogenization associated with human population geography in North America. Biol Conserv 127:261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat RV, McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (1997) Litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in oak stands along an urban–rural land use gradient. Urban Ecosyst 1:117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat RV, Russell-Anelli J, Yesilonis ID, Groffman PM (2002) Soil carbon in urban forest ecosystems. In: Kimble KM, Heath LS, Birdsey RA, Lal R (eds) The potential of U.S. forest soils to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 347–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P (1998) Alien and native species in Central European urban floras: a quantitative comparison. J Biogeogr 25:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Bacher S, Chytrý M, Jarošík V, Wild J, Celesti-Grapow J, Gassó N, Kenis M, Lambdon PW, Nentwig W, Pergl J, Roques A, Sádlo J, Solarz J, Vilà M, Hulme PE (2010) Contrasting patterns in the invasions of European terrestrial and freshwater habitats by alien plants, insects and vertebrates. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:317–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian H, Guo Q (2010) Linking biotic homogenization to habitat type, invasiveness and growth form of naturalized alien plants in North America. Divers Distrib 16:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangel TF, Diniz-Filho AF, Bini LM (2010) SAM: a comprehensive application for spatial analysis in macroecology. Ecography 33:46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard SH, Hamilton CW (1997) Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv Biol 11:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C, Godefroid S, Rocchini D (2010) Patterns of native and exotic species richness in the urban flora of Brussels: rejecting the ‘rich get richer’ model. Biol Invasions 12:233–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GR, Yurlina ME, Handel SN (1994) A century of change in the Staten Island flora: patterns of species loss and additions. B Torrey Bot Clb 121:119–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney TP, Wiegmann SM, Rogers DA, Waller DM (2004) Biotic impoverishment and homogenization in unfragmented forest understory communities. Conserv Biol 18:787–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy DB, Hill MO, Rothery P (1999) Effects of urban land cover on the local species pool in Britain. Ecography 22:507–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra LR (2012) Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. PNAS 109:16083–16088

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp H, Wurzel A (2003) The effects of climate change on the vegetation of central European cities. Urban Habitats 1:66–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner WR, Nakamura T, Dinetti M (2004) Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. Bioscience 54:585–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme, Urban Environment Unit (2007) Report of the cities and biodiversity: achieving the 2010 diversity target. UNEP/CBD/Cities/1/3. Available at: http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/biodiv/mayors-01/official/mayors-01-03-en.doc

  • USDA, NRCS (2010) The PLANTS database. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge. Available at: http://plants.usda.gov

  • Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of the earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wania A, Kühn I, Klotz S (2006) Plant richness patterns in agricultural and urban landscapes in Central Germany—spatial gradients of species richness. Landsc Urban Plan 75:97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams NSG, Schwartz MW, Vesk PA, McCarthy MA, Hahs AK, Clemants SE, Corlett RT, Duncan RP, Norton BA, Thompson K, McDonnell MJ (2009) A conceptual framework for predicting the effects of urban environments on floras. J Ecol 97:4–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson MH (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter M, Schweiger O, Klotz S, Nentwig W, Andriopoulos P, Arianoutsou M, Basnou C, Delipetrou P, Didžiulis V, Hejda M, Hulme PM, Lambdon PW, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Roy DB, Kühn I (2009) Plant extinctions and introductions lead to phylogenetic and taxonomic homogenization of the European flora. PNAS 106:21721–21725

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wittig R (2004) The origin and development of the urban flora of Central Europe. Urban Ecosyst 7:323–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Brooklyn Botanic Garden for the use of the New York Metropolitan Flora data set and the Grant F. Walton Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis at Rutgers University for use of land use data sets. We thank P. Smouse, P.J. Morin, J. Gurevitch, and two anonymous reviewers for manuscript comments. We also thank Thomas Young for graphical expertise. This paper is dedicated to our colleague and friend, Steven Clemants, whose warmth, dedication, and significant contribution to the science and conservation of urban floras is greatly missed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myla F. J. Aronson.

Additional information

S.E. Clemants is deceased.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Fig. S1

(JPEG 21 kb)

Fig. S2

(JPEG 53 kb)

Table S1

(DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aronson, M.F.J., Handel, S.N., La Puma, I.P. et al. Urbanization promotes non-native woody species and diverse plant assemblages in the New York metropolitan region. Urban Ecosyst 18, 31–45 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0382-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0382-z

Keywords

Navigation