Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental stewardship footprint research: linking human agency and ecosystem health in the Puget Sound region

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urbanization processes challenge ecosystem health in many metropolitan areas. New policy and program approaches are needed to restore and sustain natural systems as public agencies and organizations face greater demands and declining budgets. Environmental stewardship is an often overlooked intervention strategy, and the full potential of civic engagement by citizens on behalf of ecosystem health is little understood. Using a coupled systems approach, integrated analysis of social and ecological footprints can lead to greater theoretical understanding and more effective programs at the landscape scale. Here we outline two pilot studies as part of an emergent research program that is investigating the extent and impact of environmental stewardship. Qualitative interviews of stewardship managers revealed multiple dimensions of motivations and purposes for stewardship, ranging from the practical to the conceptual. A regional organization census yielded a surprisingly large number of organizations that conduct stewardship, with social and ecological values being of comparable emphasis. The initial research is based in the Puget Sound area of Washington State, U.S., but results have relevance to other urban areas. Pilot study findings now guide additional research effort about motivations, organizational networks, and theory of integrated socio-ecological systems to be derived from comprehensive footprint analysis of stewardship activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler RP, Goggin J (2005) What do we mean by “civic engagement”? J Transformative Educ 3(3):236–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti M (2008) Advances in urban ecology: integrating human and ecological processes in urban ecosystems. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti M, Marzluff J, Shulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, Zumbrunnen C (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for urban ecology. Bioscience 53(12):1169–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson K, Ostrom E (2008) Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Policy Sci 41(1):71–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson E, Barthel S, Ahrné K (2007) Measuring social-ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecol Appl 17(5):1267–1278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarri D, Diani M (2007) The integrative power of civic networks. Am J Sociol 113(3):735–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum F, MacDougall C, Smith D (2006) Participatory action research. J Epidemiol Community Health 60:854–857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berke PR (2008) The evolution of green planning, scholarship, and practice. J Am Plann Assoc 74(4):393–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkley W, Wolf KL, Blahna DJ (2010) Stewardship footprints and potential ecosystem recovery: preliminary data for Seattle and Puget Sound. In: Laband D (ed) Proceedings of emerging issues along urban/rural interfaces III: Linking science and society, Atlanta GA

  • Brunckhorst D (2002) Institutions to sustain ecological and social systems. Ecol Manage Restor 3(2):108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruyere B, Rappe S (2007) Identifying the motivations of environmental volunteers. J Environ Plan Manag 50(4):503–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 56:81–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell L, Wiesen A (2009) Restorative commons: creating health and well-being through urban landscapes. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-39. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr AJL (2002) Grass roots and green tape: principles and practices of environmental stewardship. Federation Press, Annandale Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Seattle (2007) Urban Forest Management Plan, City of Seattle, Urban Forest Coalition

  • Clary EG, Snyder M, Ridge RD, Copeland J, Stukas AA, Haugen J, Miene P (1998) Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 74(6):1516–1530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn JP (2008) Citizen science: can volunteers do real research? Bioscience 58(3):192–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins JP, Kinzig A, Grimm NB, Fagan WF, Hope D, Wu J, Borer ET (2000) A new urban ecology. Am Sci 88:416–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville A (2002) Democracy in America. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Mansfield HC, Winthrop D (trans ed) Published originally as De la democratie en Amerique, 1835

  • Delaney DG, Sperling CD, Adams CS, Leung B (2008) Marine invasive species: validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biol Invasions 10(1):117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson J, Zuckerberg B, Bonter DN (2010) Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:149–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin H (2003) Healthy places: exploring the evidence. Am J Public Health 93(9):1451–1454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (2000) Social capital and civil society. IMF Work. Pap WP-00-74. International Monetary Fund, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile JH, Harwell MA, Cropper W, Harwell CC, DeAngelis D, Davis S, Ogden JC, Lirman D (2001) Ecological conceptual models: a framework and case study on ecosystem management for South Florida sustainability. Sci Total Environ 274(1–3):231–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gragson TL, Grove M (2006) Social science in the context of the long term ecological research program. Soc Nat Resour 19(2):93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91(3):481–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grese RE, Kaplan R, Ryan RL, Buxton J (2000) The psychological benefits of volunteering in stewardship programs. In: Gobster PH, Hull RB (eds) Restoring nature: perspectives from social science and the humanities. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 265–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm N, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50:571–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove JM, Karen EH, Northrop RJ (1999) A Social ecology approach to understanding urban ecosystems and landscapes. In: Berkowitz AR, Nilon CH, Hollweg KS (eds) Understanding urban ecosystems: a new frontier for science and education. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2009) Measuring the benefits of environmental stewardship in rural landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 93(2):93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawken P (2007) Blessed unrest: how the largest movement in the world came into being and why no one saw it coming. Viking, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Head L, Muir P (2006) Edges of connection: reconceptualising the human role in urban biogeography. Aust Geogr 37(1):87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester RT (2006) Design for ecological democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4(5):390–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ (2004) Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 33(7):14–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R, Kaplan S, Ryan RL (1998) With people in mind: design and management of everyday nature. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney AR, Bradley G (1998) Human dimensions of forest management: an empirical study of stakeholder perspectives. Urban Ecosyst 2(1):5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney AR, Kaplan S (1997) Toward a methodology for the measurement of knowledge structures of ordinary people: the conceptual content cognitive map (3CM). Environ Behav 29(5):579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keough H, Blahna DJ (2006) Achieving integrative, collaborative ecosystem management. Conserv Biol 20(5):1373–1382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzig A, Cranez P (2005) Nature in the metropolis. Science 27 308 5726:1225–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Koontz TM, Steelman TA, Carmin J, Korfmacher KS, Moseley C, Thomas CW (2004) Collaborative environmental management: what roles for government? Resources for the Future, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer DB (2007) Determinants and efficacy of social capital in lake associations. Environ Conserv 34(3):186–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo FE (2003) The role of arboriculture in a healthy social ecology. J Arboric 29:148–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1949) A Sand County almanac. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leshem S, Trafford V (2007) Overlooking the conceptual framework. Innov Educ Teach Int 44:93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev E (1998) A regional restoration grants program to promote preservation and enhancement of urban natural areas. Urban Ecosyst 2:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litle K, Wainstein M, Dalton P, Meehan D (2009) Harnessing citizen science to protect and restore Puget Sound. Washington Sea Grant and Washington State University Extension, Olympia

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter S, Folke C, Alberti M, Redman C, Schneider S, Ostrom E, Pell A, Lubchenco J, Taylor W, Ouyang Z, Deadman P, Kratz T, Provencher W (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317(5844):1513–1516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lotze HK, Lenihan HS, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke RG, Kay MC, Kidwell SM, Kirby MX, Peterson CH, Jackson JB (2006) Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 312(5781):1806–1809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandarano LA (2009) Social network analysis of social capital in collaborative planning. Soc Nat Resour 22(3):245–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, JM, Ewing K (2008) Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds: a general framework and specific recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Urban Ecology 739–755.

  • Marzluff J, Shulenberger E, Endlicher W, Alberti M, Bradley G, Ryan C, ZumBrunnen C, Simon U (2008) (eds) Urban ecology: an international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis MD (1999) Polycentric governance and development: readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson EG (1993) Monitoring urban forest health. Environ Monit Assess 26:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkler M, Blackwell AG, Thompson M, Tamir H (2003) Community-based participatory research: implications for public health funding. Am J Public Health 93:1210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moskell C, Broussard Allred S, Gerenz G (2010) Examining volunteer motivations and recruitment strategies for engagement in urban forestry. Cities and the Environment 3 1: article 9

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325(5939):419–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2008) Streams in the urban landscape. Urban Ecology 207–231

  • Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2001:127–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prell C, Hubacek K, Reed M (2009) Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 22(6):501–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J, Ward H (2001) Social capital and the environment. World Dev 29(2):209–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan KG, Milward HB (2001) Do networks really work? a framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Adm Rev 61(4):414–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puget Sound Partnership (2008) Puget Sound Action Agenda: protecting and restoring the Puget Sound ecosystem by 2020. Puget Sound Partnership, Olympia, p 204

    Google Scholar 

  • Romolini M, Brinkley W, Wolf KL (in review) What is environmental stewardship? working toward a practitioner-derived definition in Seattle. Research Note PNW-xxx. Portland OR: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland OR.

  • Ryan RL (2006) The role of place attachment in sustaining urban parks. In: Platt RH (ed) The humane metropolis: people and nature in the 21st century city. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RL, Grese RE (2005) Urban volunteers and the environment: forest and prairie restoration. In: Barlett P (ed) Urban place. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider M, Scholz J, Lubell M, Mindruta D, Edwardsen M (2003) Building consensual institutions: networks and the National Estuary Program. Am J Polit Sci 47(1):143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott JP (2006) Social network analysis: a handbook. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Sendzimir J, Magnuszewski P, Flachner Z, Balogh P, Molnar G, Sarvari A, Nagy Z (2008) Assessing the resilience of a river management regime: informal learning in a shadow network in the Tisza River Basin. Ecol Soc 13(1):11

    Google Scholar 

  • Shandas V, Messer WB (2008) Fostering green communities through civic engagement: community-based environmental stewardship in the Portland area. J Am Plann Assoc 74(4):408–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen ES (2009) Cultivating resilience: urban stewardship as a means to improve health and well-being. In: Campbell L, Wiesen A (ed) Restorative commons: creating health and well-being through urban landscapes. U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-P-39, pp. 58–87.

  • Svendsen ES, Campbell LK (2008) Urban ecological stewardship: understanding the structure, function and network of community-based urban land management. Cities Environ 1(1):5

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidball KG, Krasny ME (2007) From risk to resilience: what role for community greening and civic ecology in cities. In: Wals AEJ (ed) Social learning towards a more sustainable world. Wageningen Academic, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Rees W (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner CL, Fernandez-Gimenez ME (2008) Does community-based collaborative resource management increase social capital? Soc Nat Resour 21(4):324–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals AEJ, van der Leij T (2007) Social learning. In: Wals AEJ (ed) Social learning: towards a sustainable world. Wageningen Academic, Netherlands, pp 17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington State Office of Financial Management (2007) Growth Management Act (GMA) population projections. Washington State Growth Management Act (RCW 43.62.035)

  • Webb EJ, Campbell DT et al (1966) Unobtrusive measures: nonreactive research in the social sciences. Rand McNally, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber EP (2000) A new vanguard for the environment: grass-roots ecosystem management as a new environmental movement. Soc Nat Resour 13(3):237–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal LM (2003) Urban greening and social benefits: a study of empowerment outcomes. Journal of Arboriculture 29 3:137

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf KL (2008) Metro nature services: functions, benefits and values. In: Wachter SM, Birch EL (eds) Growing greener cities: urban sustainability in the twenty-first century. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp 294–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf KL, Kruger LE (2010) Urban forestry research needs: a participatory assessment process. J For 108(1): 39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL (2000) Making collaboration work. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wordle. http://www.wordle.net/. Accessed 10/5/2009

  • Yang J, Jinxing Z (2007) The failure and success of greenbelt program in Beijing. Urban Forest Urban Greening 6(4):287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 400 N. 34th St., Suite 201, Seattle, WA, 98103, USA

    Kathleen L. Wolf

  2. Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Seattle, WA, USA

    Dale J. Blahna

  3. Cascade Land Conservancy, Seattle, WA, USA

    Weston Brinkley

  4. Rubenstein School for Environment & Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA

    Michele Romolini

Authors
  1. Kathleen L. Wolf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dale J. Blahna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weston Brinkley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michele Romolini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen L. Wolf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolf, K.L., Blahna, D.J., Brinkley, W. et al. Environmental stewardship footprint research: linking human agency and ecosystem health in the Puget Sound region. Urban Ecosyst 16, 13–32 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0175-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0175-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation