Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Functions of riparian forest in urban catchments: a case study from sub-tropical Brisbane, Australia

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Riparian forests are vital for maintaining healthy stream ecosystems; acting as buffers against nutrient and contaminant inputs, contributing energy subsidies and providing favorable instream habitat conditions. In urban catchments riparian forests are often degraded or cleared, removing the ecosystem functions the forest provides. Intact riparian forest along urban waterways, may mitigate some aspects of degradation associated with an urbanized catchment. In Bulimba Creek, an urbanized catchment in southeast Queensland, Australia, we investigated some ecosystem functions provided by riparian forest. We found that during baseflow periods a forested riparian corridor provided energy subsidies to the stream through litterfall and had a controlling influence on instream production through shading. Denitrification potential of benthic sediments increased with increasing levels of woody debris and organic matter, deposited from riparian vegetation. Denitrification was nitrate limited, indicating some potential to reduce nitrate loads in the stream. Riparian soils also showed moderate denitrification potential; which, through management strategies, could be utilized to reduce excess nitrate loads. These results suggest that riparian forests provide important functions for urban streams; highlighting the importance of conserving forest remnants in urban landscapes and the usefulness of replanting degraded riparian forest to enhance stream health and habitat condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambus P, Lowrance R (1991) Comparison of denitrification in two riparian soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:994–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balderston W, Sherr B, Payne W (1976) Blockage by acetylene of nitrous oxide reduction in Pseudomonas perfectomarinus. Appl Environ Microbiol 31:504–508

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birk EM (1979) Overstorey and understorey litter fall in a eucalypt forest: spatial and temporal variability. Aust J Bot 27:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn SE, Davies PM, Mosisch TD (1999) Ecosystem measures of river health and their responses to riparian and catchment degradation. Freshw Biol 41:333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catterall CP, Piper SD, Bunn SE, Arthur JM (2001) Flora and fauna assemblages vary with local topography in a subtropical eucalypt forest. Austral Ecol 26:56–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Chessman BC (1985) Artificial-substratum periphyton and water quality in the lower La Trobe River, Victoria. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 36:855–871

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chessman BC, Hutton PE, Burch JM (1992) Limiting nutrients for periphyton growth in sub-alpine, forest, agricultural and urban streams. Freshw Biol 28:349–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costelloe J (2005) Protocols for geomorphic and riparian zone indicators of river health. Quantifying the Health of Ephemeral Rivers (QHER) project. Final Report to Land and Water Australia, Canberra

  • Dugas WA, Heuer ML, Mayeux HS (1999) Carbon dioxide fluxes over bermudagrass, native prairie, and sorghum. Agric For Meteorol 93:121–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay S, Sinsabaugh RL (1999) Unravelling the sources and bioavailability of dissolved organic matter in lotic aquatic ecosystems. Mar Freshw Res 50:781–790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frank AB, Dugas WA (2001) Carbon dioxide fluxes over a northern, semiarid, mixed-grass prairie. Agric For Meteorol 108:317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory SV, Swanson FJ, McKee WA, Cummins KW (1991) An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. Bioscience 41:540–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groffman PM, Bulware NJ, Zipperer WC, Pouyat RV, Band LE, Colosima MF (2002) Soil nitrogen cycle processes in urban riparian zones. Environ Sci Technol 36:4547–4552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Groffman PM, Dorsey AM, Mayer PM (2005) N processing within geomorphic structures in urban streams. J North Am Benthol Soc 24:613–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill AR (1996) Nitrate removal in stream riparian zones. J Environ Qual 25:743–755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosomi M, Sudo R (1986) Simultaneous determination of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in freshwater samples using persulphate digestion. Int J Environ Stud 27:267–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inwood SE, Tank JL, Bernot MJ (2005) Patterns of denitrification associated with land use in 9 midwestern headwater streams. J North Am Benthol Soc 24:227–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inwood SE, Tank JL, Bernot MJ (2007) Factors controlling sediment denitrification in Midwestern streams of varying land use. Microb Ecol 53:247–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen A, Robertson A, Thompson L, Wilson A (2004) Development and application of a method for the rapid appraisal of riparian condition, River Management Technical Guideline No. 4. Land and Water Australia, Canberra.

  • Lake PS (1995) Of floods and droughts: river and stream ecosystems of Australia. In: Cushing CE, Cummins KW, Minshall GW (eds) Ecosystems of the world 22: river and stream ecosystems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 659–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen CJ (1967) Determination of chlorophyll and pheo-pigments: spectrophotometric equations. Limnol Oceanogr 12:343–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McClain ME, Boyer EW, Dent CL, Gergel SE, Grimm NB, Groffman PM, Hart SC, Harvey JW, Johnston CA, Mayorga E, McDowell WH, Pinnay G (2003) Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Ecosystem 6:301–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JL, Paul MJ, Taulbee WK (2005) Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscapes. J North Am Benthol Soc 24:602–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosisch TD, Bunn SE, Davies PM (2001) The relative importance of shading and nutrients on algal production in subtropical streams. Freshw Biol 46:1269–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock J, Roelke D, Gelwick F (2004) Interactions between flow, periphyton and nutrients in a heavily impacted urban stream: implications for stream restoration effectiveness. Ecol Eng 22:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Décamps H (1997) The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:621–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:333–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterjohn WT, Correll DL (1984) Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observation on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65:1466–1475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rassam DW, Fellows CS, DeHayr R, Hunter H, Bloesch P (2006) The hydrology of riparian buffer zones; two case studies in an ephemeral and a perennial stream. J Hydrobiol 235:308–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy AH, Faust CL, Freeman MC, Meyer JL (2005) Reach-scale effects of riparian forest cover on urban stream ecosystems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:2312–2329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherfurd ID, Marsh NA, Davies PM, Bunn SE (2004) Effects of patchy shade on stream water temperature: how quickly do small streams heat and cool? Mar Freshw Res 55:737–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabater S, Butturini A, Clement J, Burt T, Dowrick D, Hefting M, Matre V, Pinay G, Postolache C, Rzepecki M, Sabater F (2003) Nitrogen removal by riparian buffers along a European climatic gradient: patterns and factors of variation. Ecosyst 6:20–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schade JD, Welter JR, Marti E, Grimm NB (2005) Hydrologic exchange and N uptake by riparian vegetation in an arid-land stream. J North Am Benthol Soc 24:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SL, Roberts SC, Walsh CJ, Hatt BE (2004) Catchment urbanization and increased benthic algal biomass in streams: linking mechanisms to management. Freshw Biol 49:835–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Steege H (1994) HEMIPHOT: a programme to analyse vegetation indices, light and light quality from hemispherical photographs. Tropenbos Documents 3. Tropenbos Foundation, Wageningen

  • Walsh CJ, Sharpe AK, Breen PF, Sonneman JA (2001) Effects of urbanization on streams of the Melbourne region, Victoria. Australia. I. Benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Freshw Biol 46:535–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW, Cottingham PD, Groffman PM, Morgan RP (2005) The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J North Am Benthol Soc 24:706–723

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was undertaken as part of an Honours project in the Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Australia, under the supervision of the late Dr Christy Fellows. We dedicate this paper to her memory and her enthusiasm for riparian zones and nutrient processes. We also thank many people for their field assistance, in particular Amanda Carter, and Pat Laceby for map making expertise. Funding for the project came from a Griffith University Research Grant (GURG) to Sheldon, Fellows and Jones. We thank an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Newham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newham, M.J., Fellows, C.S. & Sheldon, F. Functions of riparian forest in urban catchments: a case study from sub-tropical Brisbane, Australia. Urban Ecosyst 14, 165–180 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-010-0151-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-010-0151-6

Keywords

Navigation