Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Use of ecological information in urban planning: Experiences from the Helsinki metropolitan area, Finland

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the use of ecological research information in urban planning focusing on Finland. Research questions addressed the importance and challenges of incorporating ecological information into the planning process, and ways to promote the use of ecological information. Fifteen key professionals from three representative development approval processes in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area were interviewed. The interviewed planners and ecologists considered ecological information important for identifying and preserving valuable urban nature and biodiversity, diminishing negative environmental impacts of construction and for enabling nature-related experiences and services for urban residents. The identified challenges for the use of the information included insufficiency, fragmented nature and lack of adequacy of information, as well as problems with the interpretation and presentation of information. In order to provide more comprehensive ecological information from urbanizing areas in Finland; there should be more coordinated efforts to produce research information that planners really need, ecologists should be more active in the process in providing ecological insights for plans, a proper and simple biodiversity valuation method should be developed, more research on the function on ecological corridors should be conducted, and biodiversity monitoring of implemented planning projects should be developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberti M, Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, Zumbrunnen C (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. BioScience 53:1169–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti M, Marzluff JM (2004) Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosystems 7:241–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg BL (2001) Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Fourth edition. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz AR, Nilon CH, Hollweg KS (eds) (2003) Understanding urban ecosystems: A new frontier for science and education. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics 29:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broberg L (2003) Conserving ecosystems locally: A role for ecologists in land-use planning. BioScience 53:670–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen NL, Bartuska AM, Brown JH, Carpenter S, D'Antonio C, Francis R, Franklin JF, MacMahon JA, Noss RF, Parsons DJ, Peterson CH, Turner MG, Woodmansee RG (1996) The report of the ecological society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 6:665–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City of Helsinki (2002) Viikki: a university district and science park for the 2000s. City Planning Department, Town Planning Division, Helsinki, Finland

  • Dale VH, Brown S, Haeuber RA, Hobbs NT, Huntly N, Naiman RJ, Riebsame WE, Turner MG, Valone TJ (2000) Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land. Ecological Applications 10:639–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR (2002) Human natures, nature conservation, and environmental ethics. BioScience 52:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Impact Assessment Act (1994), (in Finnish), January 05, http://www.finlex.fi/lains/index.html

  • Flick U (1998) An introduction to qualitative research. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores A, Pickett STA, Zipperer WC, Pouyat RV, Pirani R (1998) Adopting a modern ecological view of the metropolitan landscape: the case of a greenspace system for the New York City region. Landscape and Urban Planning 39:295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goode D (1998) Integration of nature in urban development. In: Breuste J, Feldman H, Uhlmann O (eds) Urban Ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 589–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Grahn P, Stigsdotter UA (2003) Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. BioScience 50:571–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyllin M (1999) Integrating biodiversity in urban planning. Communication in urban planning—Göteborg Conference Papers, January 05, http://www.arbeer.demon.co.uk/MAPweb/Goteb/got-mats.htm

  • Haila Y (1995) Kestävän kehityksen luontoperusta: Mitä päättäjien tulee tietää ekologiasta? Suomen Kuntaliitto, Helsinki, Finland, (in Finnish)

  • Helsingin kaupunkisuunnittelu (2004) Kaavoituskatsaus 2004. Acta Print, Helsinki, Finland, (in Finnish and Swedish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsingin kaupunki, Suomalainen insinööritoimisto Oy and Enviro Oy (2001) Broändan purolaakso: I Maisemaselvitys ja kehittämisperiaatteet, II Luontoselvitys, III Maankäytön ympäristövaikutukset. Helsingin kaupungin kaupunkisuunnitteluviraston julkaisuja 2001:8. Helsinki, Finland, (in Finnish)

  • Hess GR, Fischer RA (2001) Communicating clearly about conservation corridors. Landscape and Urban Planning 55:195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill K, White D, Maupin M, Ryder B, Karr JR, Freemark K, Taylor R, Schauman S (2002) In expectation of relationships: Centering theories around ecological understanding. In: Johnson BR, Hill K (eds) Ecology and design—Frameworks for learning. Island Press, Washington DC, pp. 271–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsjärvi S, Hurme H (2000) Tutkimushaastattelu—Teemahaastattelun teoria ja käytäntö. Helsinki University Press, Helsinki, Finland, (in Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Insinööritoimisto Paavo Ristola Oy (1990) Viikki-Latokartano osayleiskaava: Ympäristövaikutusselvitys. Helsingin kaupungin yleiskaavaosaston selvityksiä Y 1990:15, (in Finnish)

  • Johnson BR, Hill K eds. (2002) Ecology and design—Frameworks for learning. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimäki J, Clergeau P, Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M-L (2002) Winter bird communities in urban habitats: A comparative study between central and northern Europe. Journal of Biogeography 29:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RHG, Pungetti G (eds.) (2004) Ecological networks and greenways —concept, design and implementation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansanen PH (2004) The role of scientific environmental knowledge in decision-making in the City of Helsinki, Finland. Boreal Environment Research 9:543–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendle T, Forbes S (1997) Biogeography and conservation planning in the urban countryside. In: Kendle T, Forbes S (eds) Urban nature conservation. E & FN Spon, London, pp. 150–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpela KM, Hartig T, Kaiser F, Fuhrer U (2001) Restorative experience and self-regulation in favorite places. Environmental Behaviour 33:572–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtto A, Helynranta L (1998) Helsingin kasvit. Helsingin kaupungin ympäristökeskus. Yliopistopaino, Helsinki, Finland, (in Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale S (1996) Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage, Thousand Oaks, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Land Use and Building Act (1999), (in Finnish), January 05. http://www.finlex.fi/linkit/smur/19990132

  • Lankinen M, Sairinen R (2000) Helsinkiläisten ympäristöasenteet vuonna 2000. City of Helsinki Urban Facts, Research Series, 2000:6, (in Finnish)

  • Leino A, Katajisto P, Keskinen H, Kohtanen R, Kivinen K (eds.) (2001) Vantaan kaupungin viheralueohjelma 2001–2010 (Green area programme of the city of Vantaa 2001–2010). Vantaan kaupunki, Tekninen toimiala, Puisto-osasto. Mestarioffset, Vantaa, Finland, (in Finnish, with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm G (1999) Communication conserning green structure—a discussion on the interpretation of concepts. Communication in urban planning—Göteborg Conference Papers, January 05, http://www.arbeer.demon.co.uk/MAPweb/Goteb/got-guni.htm

  • Löfvenhaft K, Björn C, Ihse M (2002) Biotope patterns in urban areas: a conceptual model integrating biodiversity issues in spatial planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 58:223–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon JR, Miller RW (2003) Identifying high-value greenspace prior to land development. Journal of Arboriculture 29(1):25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Maijala O (2002) Managing urban biodiversity—a challenge for urban planning tools and processes. NSBB seminar paper 18.11.2002 in Hanasaari, Espoo, Finland

  • McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (1990) Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: An unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71:1232–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. BioScience 52:883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill SB (2004) The role of open space in urban planning. Conservation Biology 18:294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell B (2003) Integration of ecosystem management and impact assessment with spatial planning. In Framing land use dynamics: reviewed abstracts of international conference 16–18 April, 2003 Dijst M, Schot P, de Jong K, (eds.), Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands p. 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J (1999) Ecology and urban planning. Biodiversity and Conservation 8:119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J (2000) Biodiversity monitoring for decision-making. Annales Zoologici Fennici 37:307–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J (2001) The utility of movement corridors in forested landscapes. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research Supplementum 3:70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton BG (1998) Improving ecological communication: the role of ecologists in environmental policy information. Ecological Applications 8:350–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in an urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32:333–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekkarinen-Kanerva P, Hakaste H, Mayow N (2000) Towards a sustainable city—The Viikki Eco-Neighbourhood Blocks 2000. The Finnish Association of Architects. Helsinki University Press, Helsinki, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta P, Tanskanen A, Siitonen M (1997) Vascular plants of the City of Vantaa, S Finland —urban ecology, biodiversity and conservation. Lutukka 13:67–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed JM, Strauss EG, Krauss DA, Hitchcock CD, Toffler AM, O'Connor CM, Lord CP (2004) Natural cities: Linking ecological, social, and legal rapid assessments to determine conservation priorities in urban areas. In:18th Annual Meeting of Society for Conservation Biology 30.7. - 2.8.2004, Book of Abstracts, Columbia University, New York

  • Sievänen T (ed.) (2001) Luonnon virkistyskäyttö (2000). Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 802, (in Finnish). pp. 229–230

  • Silverman D (2000) Doing qualitative research: a practical handbook. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Farr JA, Cox J, Mehlman DW (1992) Movement corridors: Conservation bargains or poor investments. Conservation Biology 6:493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp H, Numata M, Huber A eds. (1995) Urban ecology as the basis for urban planning. SPB Academic publishing, the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderman T (2003) Luontoselvitykset ja luontovaikutusten arviointi —kaavoituksessa, YVA-menettelyssä ja Natura-arvioinnissa (Biodiversity impact assessment—in regional planning, environmental impact assessment and Natura 2000 assessment). Ympäristöopas 109, Suomen ympäristökeskus, Edita, Helsinki, Finland, (in Finnish with an abstract in English)

  • Teeriaho J (1998) Ehdotus luonnon monimuotoisuuden indikaattoreiksi kunnille (The indicators of biological diversity for municipalities—proposal). The Finnish Environment 221. Finnish Environment Institute. Edita, Helsinki, (in Finnish, with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjallingii SP (1996) Ecological conditions—strategies and structures in environmental planning. Technische Universiteit Delft, the Netherlands

  • Vandruff LW, Leedy DL, Stearns FW (1995) Urban wildlife and human well-being. In: Sukopp H, Numata M, Huber A (eds) Urban ecology as the basis for urban planning. SPB Academic publishing, The Netherlands, pp. 203–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Vantaan kaupunki (2002) 730700 Rekola 6 Asemakaavaselostus. Maankäyttötoimi, Kaupunkisuunnitteluyksikkö, Vantaa, Finland, (in Finnish)

  • Viikki-Kivikko -projekti (1995) Viikin osayleiskaava: Selostus. Helsingin kaupunkisuunnitteluviraston julkaisuja 1995:13, (in Finnish)

  • Yli-Pelkonen V, Kohl J (2005) The role of local ecological knowledge in sustainable urban planning: perspectives from Finland. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 1(1):3–14. http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol1iss1/0410-007.yli-pelkonen.html. Published online March 17, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Yli-Pelkonen V, Niemelä J (2005) Linking ecological and social systems in cities: Urban planning in Finland as a case. Biodiversity and Conservation 14(8):1947–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ympäristötutkimus Oy Metsätähti (1997) Viikki—luontovaikutusten arviointi. Rakentamisen vaikutukset Viikin pelto- ja metsäalueilla, (in Finnish)

  • Zipperer WC, Wu J, Pouyat RV, Pickett STA (2000) The application of ecological principles to urban and urbanizing landscapes. Ecological Applications 10:685–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, FIN-00014, Finland

    V. Yli-Pelkonen & J. Niemelä

Authors
  1. V. Yli-Pelkonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Niemelä
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Yli-Pelkonen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yli-Pelkonen, V., Niemelä, J. Use of ecological information in urban planning: Experiences from the Helsinki metropolitan area, Finland. Urban Ecosyst 9, 211–226 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-006-8591-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-006-8591-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation