Skip to main content
Log in

Fostering professional communication skills of future physicians and teachers: effects of e-learning with video cases and role-play

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of three different versions of a training programme on physician–patient and teacher–parent conversations for medical students and student teachers. The research questions concerned the differential effects of e-learning featuring contrastive video cases, role-play including video feedback and their combination. The training effects were tested to determine whether they were similar across both professional domains. In a randomised controlled trial (N = 168), three training conditions were prepared using a wait-list control group. The assessment of communication competence was based on videotaped communications between the participants and simulated patients/parents (i.e., trained actors). The results of planned contrast analyses corroborated the study expectations: first, a strong overall treatment effect was observed. Second, the combined condition was more effective than e-learning and role-play alone when controlling for prior knowledge and cognitive ability. Third, e-learning proved more effective than role-play. Exploring interaction effects indicated that student teachers benefited more from the training than medical students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Of course, not every parent–teacher/physician–patient conversation is problem-focused. However, such situations were in the focus of our training programme.

  2. The design could also be framed as being 2 × 2 × 2 factorial, which implies an identical set of experimental conditions. Because our research questions concerned focused comparisons, the analytic differences between 4 × 2 and 2 × 2 × 2 designs are of no consequence for this study. Therefore, the preferred framing was the simpler 4 × 2 design.

  3. This is following the German school grade logic, which is assumed to assist the raters.

  4. Though a pre-test was not required for securing the internal validity of the treatment effects because of the randomised assignment (Shadish et al. 2002), it would have been advantageous for the domain comparison. However, because the ASP/P assessment takes about 2 h (including waiting times) and the participants already had long training days, a pre-test with the ASP/P would have been impractical. Additionally, a pre-test might have induced testing effects; to control these would have required doubling the experimental conditions (Shadish et al. 2002). Doing so was beyond the scope of the present study.

References

  • Abelson, R. P. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspergren, K. (1999). BEME guide no. 2: Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine: A review with quality grading of articles. Medical Teacher, 21(6), 563–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baile, W. F. (2000). SPIKES—A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: Application to the patient with cancer. The Oncologist, 5(4), 302–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, R., & Daughtridge, R. (2002). Physician–patient communication in the primary care office: A systematic review. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 15(1), 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkhof, M., van Rijssen, J., Schellart, A., Anema, J., & van der Beek, A. (2011). Effective training strategies for teaching communication skills to physicians: An overview of systematic reviews. Patient Education and Counseling, 84(2), 152–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg, G., Renkl, A., Sherin, M. G., Borko, H., & Seidel, T. (2013). Five research-based heuristics for using video in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Educational Research Online, 5(1), 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., & Seago, N. (2011). Using video representations of teaching in practice-based professional development programs. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(1), 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannick, M. T., Erol-Korkmaz, H. T., & Prewett, M. (2011). A systematic review of the reliability of objective structured clinical examination scores. Medical Education, 45(12), 1181–1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromme, R., Nueckles, M., & Rambow, R. (1999). Adaptivity and anticipation in expert–laypeople communication. In S. E. Brennan, A. Giboin, & A. Traum (Eds.), Psychological models of communication in collaborative systems (pp. 17–24). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckman, R. (1992). How to break bad news. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1999). Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science and Medicine, 49(5), 651–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christianson, J. B. (2012). Physician communication with patients: Research findings and challenges. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 453–494). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35, 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualisations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotger, B. H. (2010). ‘I had no idea’: Developing dispositional awareness and sensitivity through a cross-professional pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 805–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotger, S., Dotger, B. H., & Tillotson, J. (2010). Examining how preservice science teachers navigate simulated parent–teacher conversations on evolution and intelligent design. Science Education, 94, 552–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotger, B. H., & Smith, M. (2009). ‘Where’s the Line?’ Negotiating simulated experiences to define teacher identity. The New Educator, 5(2), 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallowfield, L., & Jenkins, V. (1999). Effective communication skills are the key to good cancer care. European Journal of Cancer, 35(11), 1592–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fertleman, C., Gibbs, J., & Eisen, S. (2005). Video improved role play for teaching communication skills. Medical Education, 39, 1155–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. P. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukkink, R., Trienekens, N., & Kramer, L. C. (2011). Video feedback in education and training: Putting learning in the picture. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furr, R. M., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Evaluating theories efficiently: The nuts and bolts of contrast analysis. Understanding Statistics, 2, 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganzeboom, H. B. G. (2010, May). A new International Socio-Economic Index [ISEI] of Occupational Status for the International Standard Classification of Occupation 2008 [ISCO-08] Constructed with Data from the ISSP 2002–2007. In paper presented at annual conference of international social survey programme, Lisbon, Portugal. Retrieved September 9, 2014, from http://www.harryganzeboom.nl/pdf/2010-Ganzeboom-ISEI08-ISSP-Lisbon-%28paper%29.pdf.

  • Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Fischer, M. R., Karsten, G., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Modellierung und Assessment professioneller Gesprächsführungskompetenz von Lehrpersonen im Lehrer-Elterngespräch [Modeling and assessment of teachers' professional competence for parent-teacher conversations]. In: O. Zlatikin-Troitschanskaia (Ed.), Stationen Empirischer Bildungsforschung. Traditionslinien und Perspektiven (S. 412–426). Wiesbaden: VS.

  • Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Noll, A., & Prenzel, M. (2012). Welchen Problemen begegnen Lehrkräfte beim Führen von Elterngesprächen? Und welche Schlussfolgerungen ergeben sich daraus für die Vermittlung von Gesprächsführungskompetenz [What are Typical Problems that Teachers Face in Parent Interviews? And which Conclusions Can Be Drawn for Teaching Communication Skills?]? Die Deutsche Schule, 104, 374–382.

  • Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 393–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D., Knezek, G., Redmond, P., & Bradley, E. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of games and simulations in teacher education. Waynesville, MO: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günther, U., & Sperber, W. (2008). Handbuch für Kommunikations- und Verhaltenstrainer [Handbook for communication and behavioural trainings]. München: Reinhardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gysels, M., Richardson, A., & Higginson, I. J. (2005). Communication training for health professionals who care for patients with cancer: A systematic review of training methods. Support Cancer Care, 13(6), 356–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanafin, J., & Lynch, A. (2002). Peripheral Voices: Parental involvement, social class, and educational disadvantage. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henninger, M., & Barth, C. (2009). Kommunikation und Führung [Communication and leadership]. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 103, 211–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henninger, M., & Hörmann, C. (2007). The role of self explanations in fostering reflection. Multimedia communication training for preservice teachers. In V. Uskov (Ed.), Computers and advanced technology in education (pp. 272–275). Anaheim, CA: ACTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, W. S., & Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition, 59(1), 91–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kano, Y. (2001). Structural equation modeling for experimental data. In R. Cudeck, S. DuToit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 381–402). Lincolnwood, IL: SSI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, M., & Schneider, J. (2013). What do teachers think and how do they feel when they analyze videos of themselves teaching and of other teachers teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruijver, I. P. M., Kerkstra, A., Francke, A. L., Bensing, J. M., & Wiel, H. (2000). Evaluation of communication training programs in nursing care: A review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 39(1), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, C., & Rollnick, S. (2007). The use of simulated patients and role-play in communication skills training: A review of the literature to August 2005. Patient Education and Counseling, 67(1), 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, I., & Schulz von Thun, F. (2007). Messung komplexer Merkmale in Psychologie und Pädagogik [Measuring complex attributes in psychology and education]. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (2004). The essential communication: What parents and teachers can learn from each other. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loh, A., Simon, D., Kriston, L., & Härter, M. (2007). Patientenbeteiligung bei medizinischen Entscheidungen [Patient participation in medical decisions]. Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 104(21), A1483–A1488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, G. P., Clarke, D., & Jolley, B. (1977). An experimental comparison of three courses in history-taking skills for medical students. Medical Education, 11(3), 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. M. (Ed.). (2012). Handbook of distance education (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998–2013). Mplus version 7.11. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Nestel, D., & Tierney, T. (2007). Role-play for medical students learning about communication: Guidelines for maximising benefits. BMC Medical Education, 7(3), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, K., & Ng, C. (2001). Inductive and deductive teaching of compliments and compliment responses. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 145–170). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanson-Fisher, R., & Poole, A. (1980). Simulated patients and the assessment of medical students’ interpersonal skills. Medical Education, 14(4), 249–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. Cambridge, MA: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid Mast, M., Kindlimann, A., & Langewitz, W. (2005). Recipients’ perspective on breaking bad news: How you put it really makes a difference. Patient Education and Counseling, 58(3), 244–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuwirth, L. W. T., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2011). Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Medical Teacher, 33(6), 478–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeier, P., & Renkewitz, F. (2008). Forschungsmethoden und Statistik in der Psychologie [Research methods and statistics in Psychology]. München: Pearson Studium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, T. (2003). Technischer Bericht zur Videostudie ‘Lehr-Lern-Prozesse im Physikunterricht’ [Technical report on the video study ‘Teaching and learning processes in physics classes’]. Kiel: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, T., Blomberg, G., & Renkl, A. (2013). Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Assessing student learning responsibly: From history to an audacious proposal. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(1), 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2008). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S., Hanson, J. L., Tewksbury, L. R., Christy, C., Talib, N. J., Harris, M. A., et al. (2007). Teaching patient communication skills to medical students: A review of randomized controlled trials. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 30(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2005). The redundancy principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 159–167). Cambridge: University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Unterbrink, T., Zimmermann, L., Pfeifer, R., Wirsching, M., Brähler, E., & Bauer, J. (2008). Parameters influencing health variables in a sample of 949 German teachers. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 82(1), 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. M. T., & Dotger, B. H. (2012). Because wisdom can’t be told: Using comparison of simulated parent–teacher conferences to assess teacher candidates’ readiness for family–school partnership. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 62–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, G. P., McKinley, D. W., Boulet, J. R., Macrae, J., & Kamholz, S. (2001). Validation of the doctor–patient communication component of the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates Clinical Skills Assessment. Medical Education, 35(8), 757–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winefield, H. R., & Chur-Hansen, A. (2000). Evaluating the outcome of communication skill teaching for entry-level medical students: Does knowledge of empathy increase? Medical Education, 34(2), 90–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This programme was developed in the context of Project ProfKom - Professionalization of future physicians and teachers in the area of communication competence, funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Code 01PH08015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Gartmeier.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 24 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Fischer, M.R. et al. Fostering professional communication skills of future physicians and teachers: effects of e-learning with video cases and role-play. Instr Sci 43, 443–462 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9341-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9341-6

Keywords

Navigation