Abstract
Three experiments with students from 7th and 8th grade were performed to investigate the effects of decorative pictures in learning as compared to instructional pictures. Pictures were considered as instructional, when they were primarily informative, and as decorative, when they were primarily aesthetically appealing. The experiments investigated, whether and to what extent decorative pictures affect the learner’s distribution of attention, whether they have an effect on the affective and motivational state and whether they affect the learning outcomes. The first experiment indicated with eye-tracking methodology that decorative pictures receive only a bit initial attention as part of the learner’s initial orientation and are largely ignored afterwards, which suggests that they have only a minor distracting effect if any. The second experiment showed that despite the small amount of attention they receive, decorative pictures seem to induce better mood, alertness and calmness with learners. The third experiment indicated that decorative pictures did not intensify students’ situational interest, but reduced perceived difficulty of the learning material. Regarding outcomes of learning, decorative pictures were altogether neither harmful nor beneficial for learning. However, they moderated the beneficial effect of instructional pictures––in essence: the multimedia effect. The moderating effect was especially pronounced when learners had lower prior knowledge. The findings are discussed from the perspective of cognitive, affective and motivational psychology. Perspectives of further research are pointed out.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abele, A. (1992). Positive and negative mood influences on creativity: Evidence for asymmetrical effects. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 23, 203–221.
Alesandrini, K. L. (1987). Computer graphics in learning and instruction. In H. A. Houghton & D. M. Willows (Eds.), The psychology of illustration, instructional issues (Vol. 2, pp. 159–188). New York: Springer.
Anderson, R. C., Shirey, L. L., Wilson, P. T., & Fielding, L. G. (1987). Interestingness of children’s reading material. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Cognitive and affective process analyses (Vol. 3, pp. 287–299). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 5–26. doi:10.1023/A:1013176309260.
Chiaverina, C., Scott, C., & Steele, P. (1997). The connections project: Art, physics, and mathematics. Physics Teacher, 35, 292–294.
Comenius, J. A. (1658). Orbis sensualium pictus (The visible world in pictures) (1st ed.). Nuremberg: Breuer Publishing House.
Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183–201. doi:10.1037/h0047707.
Ellis, H. C., & Ashbrook, P. W. (1988). Resource allocation model of the effects of depressed mood states on memory. In K. Fiedler & J. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cognition and social behavior (pp. 25–43). Toronto: Hogrefe & Huber.
Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weighted Kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 613–619. doi:10.1177/001316447303300309.
Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 92–102. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.92.
Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 414–434. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.414.
Hegarty, M., & Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 717–742. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1036.
Hekkert, P. (2006). Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in design. Psychology Science, 48(2), 157–172.
Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1988). Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students’ recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 465–483. doi:10.2307/747644.
Jaeger, O. A., Holling, H., Preckel, F., Schulze, R., Vock, M., Süß, H.-M., et al. (2006). Berliner Intelligenzstrukturtest für Jugendliche: Begabungs- und Hochbegabungsdiagnostik (BIS-HB) (Berlin intelligence structure test for adolencents: Gifted and highly gifted diagnostic). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.
Kulhavy, R. W., Stock, W. A., & Caterino, L. C. (1994). Reference maps as a framework for remembering text. In W. Schnotz & R. W. Kulhavy (Eds.), Comprehension of graphics (pp. 153–162). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S0166-4115(09)60114-X.
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489–508. doi:10.1348/0007126042369811.
Levie, W. H., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustration: A review of research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 30(4), 195–232. doi:10.1007/BF02765184.
Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J., & Carney, R. N. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In D. M. Willows & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration: I. Basic research (pp. 51–85). New York: Springer.
Male, A. (2007). Illustration: a theoretical and contextual perspective. Lausanne: Ava Book.
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1–19.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358–368.
Peeck, J. (1994). Wissenserwerb mit darstellenden Bildern (Knowledge aquisition with depictive pictures). In B. Weidenmann (Ed.), Wissenserwerb mit Bildern. Instruktionale Bilder in Printmedien, film/video und Computerprogrammen (Knowledge acquisition with pictures: Instructional pictures in print media, videos and computer programs) (pp. 59–94). Bern: Hans Huber.
Pozzer, L. L., & Roth, W.-M. (2003). Prevalence, function and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1089–1114. doi:10.1002/tea.10122.
Rayner, K. (1992). Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading. New York: Springer.
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1987). Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 327–362). London: Erlbaum.
Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Burns, B. D. (2001). FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung der aktuellen motivation in lern- und leistungssituationen (QCM: Questionnaire of current motivation in actual learn and performance situations). Diagnostica, 47(2), 57–66. doi:10.1026//0012-1924.47.2.57.
Rubens, P. (Ed.). (2000). Science and technical writing: A manual of style. London: Routledge.
Salomon, G. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 647–658. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.647.
Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J. (2006). An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 344–355.
Schiefele, U., & Krapp, A. (1996). Topic interest and free recall of expository text. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 141–160. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90030-8.
Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 49–69). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 13, 141–156. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8.
Schnotz, W., & Kulhavy, R. W. (Eds.). (1994). Comprehension of graphics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 2001.
Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 23–25. doi:1040-726X/01/0300-0023.
Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information. Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition. Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527–561). New York: The Guilford.
Steyer, R., Schwenkmezger, P., Notz, P., & Eid, M. (1997). Der mehrdimensionale befindlichkeitsfragebogen (MDBF) [The multidimensional mood inventory]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Takahashi, S. (1995). Aesthetic properties of pictorial perception. Psychological Review, 102(4), 671–683. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.671.
Trafimow, D., Sheeran, P., Conner, M., & Krystina, A. F. (2002). Evidence that perceived behavioural control is a multidimensional construct: Perceived control and perceived difficulty. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 101–121. doi:10.1348/014466602165081.
Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire: Graphics Press.
Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2006). Motivational effects on self-regulated learning with different task. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 239–253. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-901.
Wainer, H. (1997). Visual revelations. Graphic tales of fate and deception from Napoleon Bonaparte to Ross Perot. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lenzner, A., Schnotz, W. & Müller, A. The role of decorative pictures in learning. Instr Sci 41, 811–831 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9256-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9256-z