Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Teacher question and student response with regard to cognition and language use

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the current study, we focus on teacher-student discourse in Pre-K science activities, with particular attention to teacher questioning. Videotaped classroom observations and teacher interviews served as the corpus of data. Overall, teachers asked mostly closed-ended questions, but used more open-ended questions when experiments were being conducted. During experiments, teachers’ questions were aimed at prediction and reasoning. In contrast, teachers used primarily closed-ended questions when science skills were being practiced and during science book readings, when their questions were oriented toward recognition and recall of factual information. The effects of the teachers’ questions can be seen in the students’ responses. When questions were open-ended, students employed a more varied vocabulary and more complex sentence structures. When teachers’ questions were oriented toward prediction and reasoning, students practiced these higher level cognitive skills in responding. Based on these findings, we provide recommendations for teaching practice in early childhood science education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (2004). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

  • Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Completed ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, 2, 89–195.

  • Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1998). Scaffolding emergent writing in the zone of proximal development. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Carin, A. A., Bass, J. E., & Contant, T. L. (2005). Teaching science as inquiry (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conezio, K., & French, L. (2002). Science in the preschool classroom. Young Children, 57(5), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rivera, C., Girolametto, L., Greenberg, J., & Weitzman, E. (2005). Children’s responses to educators’ questions in day care play groups. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14(1), 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J. T. (1982). Cognitive correspondence between question/statement and response. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 540–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrar, M. T. (1986). Teacher questions: The complexity of the cognitively simple. Instructional Science, 15(1), 89–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

  • Gall, M. D. (1984). Synthesis of research on teachers. Educational Leadership, 42(3), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, M., Hargreaves, L., Wall, D., & Comber, C. (1999). Inside the primary classroom: 20 years on (2nd ed.). Boston: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Girolametto, L., Hoaken, L., Weitzman, E., & Lieshout, R. (2000a). Patterns of adult-child linguistic interaction in integrated day care groups. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31(2), 155–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girolametto, L., Weitzman, E., Lieshout, R., & Duff, D. (2000b). Directiveness in teachers’ language input to toddlers and preschoolers in day care. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 43(5), 1101–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccillo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education & Development, 20(2), 238–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (1984). Teachers’ questions: Open, closed and half-open. Educational Research, 26(1), 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, J. D., & Rivkin, M. S. (2004). Science experiences for the early childhood years (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (1999). Effective teaching of science: A review of research. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W., & Qualter, A. (2004). The teaching of science in primary schools (4th ed.). London: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzie, M. B., Robert, C., Pianta, R. C., Kilday, C., McGuire, P., & Pinkham, A. M. (2009, March). Development of curricula, teacher supports and assessments for pre-kindergarten mathematics and science. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE), Washington, DC.

  • Kontos, S., & Keyes, L. (1999). An ecobehavioral analysis of early childhood classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 14(1), 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koufetta-Menicou, C., & Scaife, J. (2000). Teachers’ questions—types and significance in science education. School Science Review, 81(296), 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. M., & Hand, B. (2009). Factors affecting the implementation of argument in the elementary science classroom. A longitudinal case study. Research in Science Education, 39(1), 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, S. L., Pence, K. L., Justice, L. M., & Bowles, R. P. (2008). Educators’ use of cognitively challenging questions in economically disadvantaged preschool classroom contexts. Early Education and Development, 19(2), 340–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

  • Mills, S. R., Rice, C. T., Berliner, D. C., & Rosseau, E. W. (1980). The correspondence between teacher questions and student answers in classroom discourse. The Journal of Experimental Educational, 48,194–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, M., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (2000). Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M., & Bi, X. (1995). Language learning in context. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15(2), 148–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogu, U., & Schmidt, S. R. (2009). Investigating rocks and sand. Young Children, 64(1), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Jesso, B., & McCabe, A. (1999). Encouraging narratives in preschoolers: An intervention study. Journal of Child Language, 26(01), 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, K. P., Anthony, A. B., Justice, L., & Bowles, R. (2009). Preschoolers’ exposure to language stimulation in classrooms serving at-risk children: The contribution of group size and activity context. Early Education and Development, 20(1), 53–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kleeck, A., Gillam, R. B., Hamilton, L., & McGrath, C. (1997). The relationship between middle-class parents’ book-sharing discussion and their preschoolers’ abstract language development. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 40(6), 1261–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. A., & Sattes, B. D. (2005). Quality questioning: Research-based practice to engage every learner. London: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasik, B. A., Bond, M. A., & Hindman, A. (2006). The effects of a language and literacy intervention on head start children and teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. J., Arnold, D. S., Epstein, J. N., Angell, A. L., Smith, M., & Fischel, J. E. (1994). A picture book reading intervention in day care and home for children from low-income families. Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 679–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittmer, D. S., & Honig, A. S. (1991). Convergent or divergent? Teacher questions to three-year-old children in day care. Early Child Development and Care, 68(1), 141–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wragg, E. C., & Brown, G. (2001). Questioning in the primary school. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, T. A., Justice, L. M., Piasta, S. B., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2010). Preschool teachers’ literal and inferential questions and children’s responses during whole-class shared reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The work reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305A07068 to the University of Virginia. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the positions or represent the view of the U.S. Department of Education. This paper was presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO, 2010.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youngju Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, Y., Kinzie, M.B. Teacher question and student response with regard to cognition and language use. Instr Sci 40, 857–874 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9193-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9193-2

Keywords

Navigation