Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Promoting attitude change and expressed willingness to take action toward climate change in college students

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the relationship among cognitive and motivational variables impacting college students’ willingness to take mitigative action to reduce the impacts of human-induced climate change. One hundred and forty college students were asked to read a persuasive text about human-induced climate change and were pre and post tested on their attitudes about climate change and their willingness to take action to mitigate its effects. Students showed statistically significant changes in their attitudes about climate change and their willingness to commit to take action. A path model demonstrated that openness to change and a willingness to think deeply about issues predicted both change in attitudes and expressed willingness to take action. This research demonstrates that a persuasive text has the potential to promote change around complex socio-scientific issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, P. A., Fives, H., Buehl, M. M., & Mulhern, J. (2002). Teaching as persuasion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 795–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., Buehl, M. M., & Sperl, C. T. (1997). The influence of prior knowledge, beliefs, and interest in learning from persuasive text. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Reading Conference.

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. (2000). Research design and issues of validity. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 3–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, S. H., Sinatra, G. M., & Nussbaum, E. M. (2011). “Pluto has been a planet my whole life!” Emotions, attitudes, and conceptual change in elementary students learning about Pluto’s reclassification. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J., & Jarvis, W. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, M. J. (1995). Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 778–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, M. J. (2001). Analyzing science textbook materials to determine how “persuasive”: They are. Theory into Practice, 40(4), 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, M. J., & Garner, R. (1996). Do adults change their minds after reading persuasive text? Written Communication, 13(3), 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Common sense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 161–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 345–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBacker, T. K., & Crowson, H. M. (2006). Influences on cognitive engagement: Epistemological beliefs and need for closure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 535–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBacker, T. K., & Crowson, H. M. (2008). Measuring need for closure in classroom learners. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 711–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodick, J., & Orion, N. (2003). Measuring student understanding of geological time. Science Education, 87(5), 708–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortner, R. W., Lee, J., Corney, J. R., Romanello, S., Bonnell, J., Luthy, B., et al. (2000). Public understanding of climate change: Certainty and willingness to act. Environmental Education Research, 6(2), 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, R. L., & Sakamoto, Y. (2003). The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 414–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional fit criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynd, C. (2003). Conceptual change in response to persuasive messages. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 291–316). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2008). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jörkeskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006a). LISREL 8.80. Chicago: Scientific Software International, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jörkeskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006b). PRELIS 2 user’s reference guide: A program for multivariate data screening and data summarization; A preprocessor for LISREL. Chicago: Scientific Software International, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovchelovitch, S. (2006). Knowledge in context: Representations community, and culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardash, C. M., & Scholes, R. (1995). Effects of preexisting beliefs and repeated readings on belief change, comprehension, and recall of persuasive text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 201–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardash, C. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1996). Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 260–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, T. Z. (1993). Causal influences on school learning. In H. J. Walberg (Ed.), Analytic methods for educational productivity (pp. 21–47). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Lay epistemic theory in social-cognitive psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 1(3), 181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: ‘Seizing’ and ‘freezing’. Psychological Review, 103(2), 263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, D., & Sinatra, G. M. (2010). College students’ perceptions about the plausibility of human-induced climate change. Research in Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11165-010-9196-z.

  • Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., & Scirica, F. (2006). Prediction of students’ argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding. Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 492–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messaris, P. (1997). Visual persuasion: The role of images in advertising. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. K. (2001). Teaching as persuasion: A new metaphor for a new decade. Theory into Practice, 40(4), 224–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, E. M., & Bendixen, L. D. (2003). Approaching and avoiding arguments: The role of epistemological beliefs, need for cognition, and extraverted personality traits. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 573–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 8, 16–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., & Chinn, C. A. (2011). Thinking and reasoning in science: Promoting epistemic conceptual change. In K. Harris, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Educational psychology: Contributions to education (Vol. 3, pp. xxx–xxx). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Sinatra, G. M., & Kardash, C. A. (2004). Teacher candidates’ epistemological beliefs, dispositions, and views on teaching as persuasion. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., & Mason, L. (2008). Beyond knowledge: Learner characteristics influencing conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 560–582). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., & Southerland, S. A. (2010). A little knowledge is a dangerous thing: Using beliefs and dispositions to make judgments about the validity of scientific theories. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 510–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mawah, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (1995). EPATH. In Statistica 5.0. Tulsa, LI: StatSoft.

  • Stevens, W. K. (2007). On the global climate beat, doubt gives way to certainty. New York Times.

  • Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widaman, K. F., & Thompson, J. S. (2003). On specifying the null model for incremental fit indices in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 8, 16–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gale M. Sinatra.

Appendices

Appendix A

Rate the degree to which you agree with the following statements:

1. Scientific evidence points to a warming trend in global climate.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Unsure

Agree

Strongly agree

1

2

3

4

5

2. Human activity has been the driving force behind the warming trend over the last 50 years.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Unsure

Agree

Strongly agree

1

2

3

4

5

3. The release of CO2 (carbon dioxide) from human activity (such as smoke stacks and car emissions) has played a central role in raising the average surface temperature of the earth.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Unsure

Agree

Strongly agree

1

2

3

4

5

4. The surface temperature of the earth has risen by more than 1 degree Fahrenheit since 1900.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Unsure

Agree

Strongly agree

1

2

3

4

5

5. The Greenland ice cap is melting faster than had previously been thought.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Unsure

Agree

Strongly agree

1

2

3

4

5

6. Human activity is responsible for the continuing rise in average global temperature.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Unsure

Agree

Strongly agree

1

2

3

4

5

7. The speed with which the melting ice caps may raise sea levels is uncertain.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Unsure

Agree

Strongly agree

1

2

3

4

5

8. The likelihood that emissions are the main cause of the observed warming trend of the last 50 years is between 90 and 99%.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Unsure

Agree

Strongly agree

1

2

3

4

5

9. Former Vice President Al Gore’s documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth,” about global climate change is just propaganda.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Unsure

Agree

Strongly agree

1

2

3

4

5

10. Natural phenomena such as solar variations combined with volcanic activity are the real cause of the warming effect.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Unsure

Agree

Strongly agree

1

2

3

4

5

11. Humans have very little effect on climate temperature.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Unsure

Agree

Strongly agree

1

2

3

4

5

12. An increase in CO2 (carbon dioxide) is directly related to an increase in global temperature.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Unsure

Agree

Strongly agree

1

2

3

4

5

13. It is arrogant to assume that humans can influence climate temperature.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Unsure

Agree

Strongly agree

1

2

3

4

5

Appendix B

In order to reduce the effects of global warming, we may need to make some sacrifices. Listed below are several examples of action that could help to reduce global warming. Please use the rating scale below to indicate how willing you would be to take action to reduce global warming.

1. I’m willing to use stop using plastic grocery bags and use recycled bags instead.

Not willing at all

Somewhat willing

Totally willing

Willing enough to convince others

1

2

3

4

2. I’m willing to stop buying bottled water because the manufacturing process for plastic water bottles is carbon intensive.

Not willing at all

Somewhat willing

Totally willing

Willing enough to convince others

1

2

3

4

3. I’d be willing to trade in my SUV for a smaller car.

Not willing at all

Somewhat willing

Totally willing

Willing enough to convince others

1

2

3

4

4. I’d be willing to car pool.

Not willing at all

Somewhat willing

Totally willing

Willing enough to convince others

1

2

3

4

5. I’m willing to pay more money to buy a hybrid car.

Not willing at all

Somewhat willing

Totally willing

Willing enough to convince others

1

2

3

4

6. I’m willing to replace all the light bulbs in my house with energy efficient fluorescent bulbs.

Not willing at all

Somewhat willing

Totally willing

Willing enough to convince others

1

2

3

4

7. I’m willing to pay a .50 cents surcharge per gallon of gas to go toward greenhouse gas reduction.

Not willing at all

Somewhat willing

Totally willing

Willing enough to convince others

1

2

3

4

8. I’m willing to keep my home air conditioning system set no lower than 75 degrees in the summer.

Not willing at all

Somewhat willing

Totally willing

Willing enough to convince others

1

2

3

4

9. I would vote in favor of requiring car manufacturers to raise the number of miles per gallon their cars get, even if it meant all cars would cost more.

Not willing at all

Somewhat willing

Totally willing

Willing enough to convince others

1

2

3

4

10. I’m willing to reduce the numbers of hours a week I use electronic devices (computer, cell phone, TV, etc.).

Not willing at all

Somewhat willing

Totally willing

Willing enough to convince others

1

2

3

4

11. I would support legislation reducing the legal speed limit to 55 miles per hour.

Not willing at all

Somewhat willing

Totally willing

Willing enough to convince others

1

2

3

4

12. Regardless of the posted speed limit, I’m willing to drive no faster than 55 miles per hour in order to reduce energy consumption.

Not willing at all

Somewhat willing

Totally willing

Willing enough to convince others

1

2

3

4

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sinatra, G.M., Kardash, C.M., Taasoobshirazi, G. et al. Promoting attitude change and expressed willingness to take action toward climate change in college students. Instr Sci 40, 1–17 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9166-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9166-5

Keywords

Navigation