Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of ensiled brewers spent grain (BSG) when used as replacement to cotton seed cake in the concentrate diet of lactating crossbred dairy cows. Eight early lactating F1 Boran X Friesian cows were used in a short term feeding trial to identify optimum level of ensiled BSG substitution of cotton seed cake (0, 33, 66, and 100%) in iso-nitrogenous diets. A 4 × 4 double Latin square design was used to analyze the data set generated from the feeding and digestibility trials. The results showed that as the level of ensiled BSG replacement to cotton seed cake increased, daily intakes on the natural pasture hay: 8.1 (T1) vs 7.6 (T2), 6.0 (T3), and 5.1 (T4); total feed dry matter: 14.6 (T1) vs 14.0 (T2), 12.9 (T3), and 12.2 (T4); crude protein (CP): 2.0 (T1) vs 1.9 (T2), 1.8 (T3), and 1.7 (T4); neutral detergent fiber (NDF): 8.4 (T1) vs 8.2 (T2), 7.4 (T3), and 6.8 (T4); and acid detergent fiber (ADF): 4.8 (T1) vs 4.5 (T2), 3.8 (T3), and 3.3 (T4) decreased (P < 0.05). However, estimated metabolizable energy (EME) intakes (129 vs 126) and body weight of the animals (465 vs 467) on the control diet and dietary T2 (33% BSG replacement for cottonseed cake) were comparable (P > 0.05). Thereafter, differences in daily EME intakes and body weight changes decreased with an increase in the level of ensiled BSG in the concentrate diet (P < 0.05) compared with both the control and animals on T2. Ensiled BSG, on the other hand, substantially improved (P < 0.05) total ration’s apparent digestibility of dry matter (DM): 629 (T1) vs 659 (T3), 686 (T4); CP: 676(T1) vs 690(T3), 738(T4); NDF: 524 (T1) vs 544 (T3), 581 (T4); and ADF: 341 (T1) vs 350 (T2), 392 (T3), 440(T4) and daily milk yield: 14.5 (T1) vs 15.4 (T4) and milk production efficiency: 0.98 (T1) vs 1.11 (T3) and 1.26 (T4). So, ensiled BSG can be recommended to fully replace cotton seed cake from the concentrate diet of lactating dairy cows under local conditions. Additional research is needed to minimize and/or avoid body weight loss, milk fat, and total solids.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adugna, T, 2008. Feed resources and feeding management: a manual for feedlot operators and development workers. Ethiopia Sanitary and Phyto-sanitary Standards and Livestock and Meat Marketing Program (SPS-LMM), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 48p.
AOAC, 1990. Association of analytical chemists. Official methods of analysis. 15th Edition. AOAC Inc, Arlington, Virginia, USA. 957p.
ARC, 1990. Agricultural Research Council. The nutrient requirement of ruminant livestock. Common Wealth Agricultural Bureaux. Slough, England. pp:65-71
Nguyen Xuan Ba, Nguyen Huu Van, Le Duc Ngoan, Clare, M. L., Peter, T. D., 2008. Effects of amount of concentrate supplement on forage intake, diet digestibility and live weight gain in Yellow Cattle in Vietnam. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 21(12): 1736 – 1744.
Belibasakis, N. G. and Tsirgogianni, A. D., 1996. Effects of wet BSG on milk yield, milk composition and blood components of dairy cows in hot weather. Anim. Feed Sci.Technol., 57: 175-181.
Boessinger, M., Hug, H., Wyss U., 2005. Les drêches de brasserie, un aliment protéique intéressant. Revue UFA, 4/05, 8401 Winterthur.
Davis, C. L., Grenawalt, D. A., McCoy, G. C., 1983. Feeding values of pressed BSG for lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 66:73-79.
Dhiman, T. R., Bingham, H. R., Radloff, H. D., 2003. Production response of lactating cows fed dried versus wet BSG in diets with similar dry matter content. J. Dairy Sci., 86:2914–2921.
Doreau, M., Michalet-Doreau, B., Grimaud, P., Atti N., Nozière, P., 2003. Consequences of underfeeding on digestion and absorption in sheep. Small Rum. Res. 49:289-301.
Faccenda, A., Maximiliane, A. Z., Deise, D. C., André, S. A., Tatiane, F., Everline, I., Eckstein, F. A., Anschau, C., Regina, S., 2017. Use of dried BSG instead of Soybean meal to feed lactating cows. Braz. J. Anim. Sci., 46(1):39-46.
FAO, 2018. Ethiopia: report on feed inventory and feed balance. Rome. 160p.
Fekede, F., Getu, K., Getnet , A., 2015. Nutritional qualities of agro-industrial by-products and local supplementary feeds for dairy cattle feeding. Eth. J. Agri. Sci. 26(1): 13-26
Geron, L. J., Zeoula, L. M., Erkel, J. A., do Prado, I. N., Bublitz, E., do Prado, O. P. P., 2010. Nutrient intake and digestibility and milk yield of cows fed with fermented brewer's grain. J. Anim. Sci., 32(1): 69-76.
Getu, K., Birhan, T., Getnet, A., Getachew, A., 2018. Production, preservation, and utilization patterns of brewers spent grain in Ethiopia. Ethiopian. J. Agric. Sci. 28(3) 1-17.
Heuzé, V., Thiollet, H., Tran, G., Edouard, N., Lessire, M., Lebas, F., 2016. Brewer’s yeast. Feedipedia, a program by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ, and FAO. http://www.feedipedia.org/node/72).
Heuzé, V., Tran, G., Sauvant, D., Lebas, F., 2017. Brewer’s grains. Feedipedia, a programe by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/74.
Hoffman, P. C., Armentano, L. E., 1988. Comparison of brewers wet and dried grains and soybean meal as supplements for dairy cattle. J. Nutr. Reports International, 38: 655-663.
Imaizumi, H., Batiste, F., Souza, J., Santos, F. A. P., 2015. Replacing soybean meal for wet brewer’s grains or urea on the performance of lactating dairy cows. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 47: 877-882.
Jenkins, T. C., McGuire, M. A., 2006. Major advances in nutrition: impact on milk composition. J. Dairy Sci., Savoy, 89(4): 1302-1310.
Khan, A. M., Mahr, U. N., Sarwar, M., 2003. Techniques measuring digestibility for the nutritional evaluation of feeds. International J. Agri. & Bio. 05(1): 91–94. Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Mahnken, C. L., 2010. Utilization of wet breweries grains as a replacement for corn silage in lactating dairy cow diets. An MSc Thesis submitted to the Department of Animal Science and Industry. Kansas State University. 59p.
McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A., Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Morgan, C. A., 2002. Animal nutrition. 6th ed. Longman Scientific and Technical, Prentice Hall. 544p.
Milk Lacto scan Analyzer, 2016. Operational manual. 4, Narodni Buditeli str. 8900, Nova Zagora, Bulgaria. 79p.
Miyazawa, K., Sultana, H., Hirata, T., Kanda, S., Itabashi, H., 2007. Effect of BSG on rumen fermentation, milk production and milk composition in lactating dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci., 78: 519-526.
Mussato, S.I., Dragone, G., Roberto, I.C., 2006. Brewers spent grain: generation, characteristics and potential applications. J. Cereal Sci. 43: 1–14.
NRC, 1989. National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 6th Ed. National Academic Press; Washington, DC, USA. 750p
NRC, 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th Revised Edition. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 406p.
Ranjhan, S. K., 2001. Animal nutrition in the tropics. 5th Revised Edition, Vikas Publishing House P. Ltd. New Delhi, India, pp: 159-167.
Santos, M. B., Nader, G. A., Robinson, P. H., Kiran, D., Krishnamoorthy, U., Gomes, M.J., 2010. Impact of simulated field drying on in-vitro gas production and voluntary dry matter intake of rice straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 159: 96–104.
SAS, 2014. Statistical Analysis System. SAS user’s guide: Statistics, Version 9.3. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
Senthil, M. S., Sakkariya, I., Seethalakshimi, M., Ramanathan, A., Raja, T. V., Joseph, M., 2015. Influence of feeding wet brewer’s grains on dry matter intake and milk quality and quantity in lactating cows. Ind. J. Nat. Sci. 5(29): 8.
Senthilkumar, S., 2009. Effect of brewers waste on nutrient digestibility of paddy straw based diet in lactating cows. Ph.D. Thesis, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Thrissur (KAU). 242p.
Seyoum, B., Zinash, S., Dereje, F., 2007. Composition and nutritive value of Ethiopian feedstuff, Research Report No.73. Institute of Agricultural Research (IAR), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp. 9-19.
Souza, L. C., de Zambom, M. A., Alcalde, C. R., Fernandes, T., Castagnara, D. D., Radis, A. C., Santos, S. M., Almeida, de Possamai, A. P., Pasqualotto, M., 2016. Feed intake, nutrient digestibility, milk production and composition in dairy cows fed silage of wet brewers spent grain. Semina Ciências Agrárias Londrina, 37 (2): 1069-1080.
Tesfaye, F., Getnet, A., Mengistu, U., 2015. Effect of supplementation with different proportions of breweries dried grain and maize bran mixtures on the performance of crossbred dairy cows. International Journal Technology Enhancements and Emerging Engineering Research, 3(10): 1-7.
Tilley, J. M. A., Terry, R. A., 1963. A two-stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. British Grassland Society, 18: 104.
Tyasi, L. T., Gxasheka, M., Tlabela, P. C., 2015. Assessing the effect of nutrition on milk composition of dairy cows: a review. Int. J. Curr. Sci., 17: 56-63.
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., 1985. Analysis of forage and fibrous foods. A laboratory manual for animal science 613 Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. 202p.
Gabriella A. Varga, Virginia A. Ishler, 2010. Managing nutrition for optimal milk components.https://articles.extension.org:443/pages/11300/managingnutrition
West, J. W., Ely, L. O., Martin, S. A., 1994. Wet brewers grains for lactating dairy cows during hot, humid weather. J. Dairy Sci., 77 (1): 196-204
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the team of the Laboratory of Dairy Nutrition and Microbiology for assistance in sample analysis.
Funding
The authors received funding from project AGP-II (Agricultural Growth Program) and Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Getu, K., Getachew, A., Berhan, T. et al. Supplementary value of ensiled brewers spent grain used as replacement to cotton seed cake in the concentrate diet of lactating crossbred dairy cows. Trop Anim Health Prod 52, 3675–3683 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02404-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02404-5