Skip to main content
Log in

Productivity of different cow genetic groups in dual-purpose cattle production systems in south-eastern Mexico

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate the effect of cow genetic group, nutritional level and their interaction on some economically important traits of dual-purpose herds managed under field conditions. Nine herds were monitored during a production cycle in Yucatan, Mexico. Herds were grouped into four nutritional levels (NL) based on the metabolizable energy (ME) apparently available on pasture, nutritional management, and milk production. Cows were classified into three genetic groups (GG): low (≤25%), middle (25–75%) and high (≥75%) graded for Bos taurus inheritance. Total milk sold (TMS), days in milk (DIM), TMS adjusted to DIM within each NL (TMSA), body condition score (BCS) at calving, changes of BCS during lactation (CBCS), calf weaning weight (WW), age at weaning (AW), kg of calf weaned per cow (KWC) and calf mortality were studied. The statistical model included the fixed effects of NL, GG, month of calving (MC), parity number (PN) and BCS at calving and GG × NL interaction. The effects of NL, GG, MC, PN and GG × NL were significant (p < 0.05) for TMS, KWC. As expected, TMS increased with NL from 562.4 ± 106 kg for NL1 to 2366.3 ± 100.1 kg for NL4. KWC was greatest for NL2 (138.6 kg) followed by NL1 (135 kg); the lowest KWC corresponded to NL4 (96.0 kg) (p < 0.05). TMS values for the middle (1727 ± 94.7 kg) and the high graded GG (1603.5 ± 83.5 kg) were twice those for the low graded GG cows (828.5 ± 95 kg) (p < 0.05). KWC was also higher for the middle graded group (152.8 kg) than for the low or (104 kg) or the high graded GG (118 kg) (p < 0.05). With better nutrition cows of all GG improved their milk performance but not the calf traits. CBCS was negative for all GG. The highest BCS lost was for cows in NL1 and NL2 and for cows in the high graded GG (p < 0.05).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AW:

age at weaning

BCS:

body condition score

CBCS:

changes of body condition score

DIM:

days in milk

GG:

genetic group

KWC:

kg of calf weaned per cow calved

ME:

metabolizable energy

NL:

nutritional level

TMS:

total milk sold

TMSA:

total milk sold adjusted within each NL

WW:

weaning weight

References

  • Anderson, S. and Wadsworth, J. (eds), 1995. Dual Purpose Cattle Reseach, Proccedings of an International Workshop, IFS-UADY, Mérida, Yucatán, México, March, 1992

  • Ayala, A., Honhold, N., Delgado, R. and Magaña J., 1995. A visual condition scoring scheme for Bos indicus and crossbred cattle. In: S. Anderson and J. Wadsworth (eds.), Dual Purpose Cattle Reseach, Proccedings of an International Workshop, IFS-UADY, Mérida, Yucatán, México, March, 1992, 119–128

  • Duch, G.J., 1988. La conformación territorial del estado de Yucatán; los componentes del medio físico, (Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Centro Regional de la Península de Yucatán, México), 427p

  • Garnsworthy, P.C., 1988. The effect of energy reserves at calving on performance of dairy cows. In: P.C. Garnsworthy (ed), Feeding and Management of the Dairy Cow, (Butterworths, London), 157–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnsworthy, P.C. and Topps, J.H., 1982. The effect of body condition at calving on their food intake and performance when given complete diets. Animal Production, 35, 113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, P., 1991. Producción de vacas mestizas en Panamá. Turrialba, Costa Rica, 81–99

  • Holmann, F., Blake, R.W., Hahn, M.V., Baker, R., Milligan, R.A., Ontenacu, P.A and Stanton, T.L., 1990. Comparative profitability of purebred and crossbred Holstein herds. Journal of Dairy Science, 73, 2195–2205

    Google Scholar 

  • IFPRI, 1995. Global Food Projections to 2020. Implication for Investment, (Food, Agriculture, Environment Discussion Paper 5; International Food Policy Research Institute. Washington, DC)

  • Madalena, F.E., Teodoro, R.L., Lemos, A.M., Monteiro, J.B.N. and Barbosa, T.R., 1990. Evaluation of strategies for crossbreeding of dairy cattle in Brazil. Journal of Dairy Science, 73, 1887–1901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, K.L., Lean, I.J. and Westwood, T.C., 1996. The effects of lactation on the fertility of dairy cows. Australian Veterinary Journal, 73, 141–147

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, R.E., 1985. Crossbreeding in tropical areas with emphasis on milk, health fitness. Journal of Dairy Science, 68, 2418–2435

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGlothen, M.E., Farouk, E.A., Wilcox, C.J. and Davis, R.H., 1995. Effects on milk yield of crossbreeding zebu and European breeds in The Sudan. Braziliam Journal of Genetics, 18, 221–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, T.R. and Lucía Vaccaro, 1989. Dual cattle production systems. In: C.J.C. Phillips (ed.), New Techniques in Cattle Production, Proceedings of the Second International Symposium of New Techniques, held at the University of Wales, Bangor, UK September 1988, (Butterworths, London), 20–32

  • Reaves, C.W., Wilcox, C.J., Salazar, J.M. and Adkinson, R.W., 1985. Factors affecting productive and reproductive performance of dairy cows in El Salvador. Journal of Dairy Science, 68, 3104–3109

    Google Scholar 

  • Seré, C. and Vaccaro, L., 1985. Milk production from dual purpose systems in tropical Latin America. In: A.J. Smith (ed.), Milk Production in Developing Countries, (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, Scotland), 459–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale, C.R., 1997. Supplements improve the production of dairy cows grazing either white clover or paspalum-dominant pastures in late lactation. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 37, 295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewolde, A. and Van Dijk, J., 1993. Conservation and preservation of animal genetic resources in dairy and beef cattle of Latin America. CATIE, 74–85

  • Vaccaro, Lucía and López, Delia, 1995. Genetic improvement of dual purpose cattle in Latin America, (Animal Genetic Resources Information No. 16; UNEP, FAO, Rome), 15–32

  • Vaccaro, L., Quijandría, B. and Li Pun, 1988. The role of animal-breeding studies in farming system research, (Manuscript Report 208e; IDERC-CRDI-CIID, Canada)

  • Vaccaro, L., Pérez, L., Mejias, H., Khalil, R. and Vaccaro, R., 1997. Cuantificación de las interacciones genotipo-:ambiente en sistemas de producción con bovinos de doble propósito. In: C. Lascano and F. Holmann (eds), Metodologías para la Investigación en Fincas con Sistemas de Producción Animal de Doble Propósito, (CIAT, Cali, Colombia), 72–81

  • Wildman, E.E., Jones, G.M., Wagner, P.E., Bonan, R.L., Troutt, H.F. Jr. and Lesch, T.N., 1982. A dairy cow body condition system and its relationship to selected characteristics. Journal of Dairy Science, 65, 495–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazman, J.A., McDowell, R.E., Cestero, F., Arroyo, J.D., Rivera-Anaya, M., Soldevilla, M. and Roman, F., 1981. Efficiency of utilization of tropical grass pasture by lactating cows with and without supplement. Journal of Agricultural University of Puerto Rico, 66, 200–208

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. G. Magana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magana, J.G., Tewolde, A., Anderson, S. et al. Productivity of different cow genetic groups in dual-purpose cattle production systems in south-eastern Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod 38, 583–591 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-006-4247-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-006-4247-1

Keywords

Navigation