Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A model to predict the frequency of integration of fitness-related QTLs from cultivated to wild soybean

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Transgenic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the proliferation of genetically modified (GM) products and the almost exponential growth of land use for GM crops, there is a growing need to develop quantitative approaches to estimating the risk of escape of transgenes into wild populations of crop relatives by natural hybridization. We assessed the risk of transgene escape by constructing a population genetic model based on information on fitness-related QTLs obtained from an F 2 population of wild soybean G. soja × cultivated soybean Glycine max. Simulation started with ten F 1 and 990 wild soybeans reproducing by selfing or outcrossing. Seed production was determined from the genetic effects of two QTLs for number of seeds (SN). Each seed survived winter according to the maternal genotype at three QTLs for winter survival (WS). We assumed that one neutral transgene was inserted at various sites and calculated its extinction rate. The presence of G. max alleles at SN and WS QTLs significantly decreased the probability of introgression of the neutral transgene at all insertion sites equally. The presence of G. max alleles at WS QTLs lowered the risk more than their presence at SN QTLs. Although most model studies have concentrated only on genotypic effects of transgenes, we show that the presence of fitness-related domestication genes has a large effect on the risk of transgene escape. Our model offers the advantage of considering the effects of both domestication genes and a transgene, and they can be widely applied to other wild × crop relative complexes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe J, Hasegawa A, Fukushi H (1999) Introgression between wild and cultivated soybeans of Japan revealed by RFLP analysis for chloroplast DNAs. Econ Bot 53:285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broich SL, Palmer RG (1980) A cluster analysis of wild and domesticated soybean phenotypes. Euphytica 29:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC (2003) Dangerous Liaisons? When cultivated plants mate with their wild relatives. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita R, Ohara M, Okazaki K, Shimamoto Y (1997) The extent of natural cross-pollination in wild soybean (Glycine soja). J Hered 88:124–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Hails RS, Morley K (2005) Genes invading new populations: a risk assessment perspective. Trends Ecol Evol 20:245–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Han OK, Kaga A, Isemura T, Wang XW, Tomooka N, Vaughan DA (2005) A genetic linkage map for azuki bean. [Vigna angularis (Willd.) Ohwi & Ohashi]. Theor Appl Genet 111:1278–1287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haygood R, Ives AR, Andow DA (2003) Consequences of recurrent gene flow from crops to wild relatives. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:1879–1886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymowitz T, Singh RJ (1987) Taxonomy and speciation. In: Hymowitz T, Singh RJ (eds) Soybeans improvement, production, and uses. American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 23–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenczewski E, Ronfort J, Chevre AM (2003) Crop-to-wild gene flow, introgression and possible fitness effects of transgenes. Environ Biosafety Res 2:9–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaga A et al (2005) Exploration and collection for hybrid derivatives between wild and cultivated soybean: preliminary survey in Akita and Hiroshima Prefectures, Japan. Ann Rep Exploit Intro Plant Genet Res 21:59–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim P, Diers BW, Shoemaker RC (1990) Genetic analysis of soybean hard seededness with molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 79:465–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly CK, Bowler MG, Breden F, Fenner M, Poppy GM (2005) An analytical model assessing the potential threat to natural habitats from insect resistance transgenes. Proc Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:1759–1767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollipara KP, Singh RJ, Hymowitz T (1997) Phylogenetic and genomic relationships in the genus Glycine Willd. based on sequences from the ITS region of nuclear rDNA. Genome 40:57–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kosambi DD (1944) The estimation of map distance from recombination values. Ann Eugen 12:172–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda Y, Kaga A, Apa A, Duncan AV, Tomooka N, Yano H, Matsuoka N (2005) Exploration, collection and monitoring of wild soybean and hybrid derivatives between wild soybean and cultivated soybean: based on field surveys at Akita, Ibaraki, Aichi, Hiroshima and Saga Prefectures. Ann Rep Exploit Intro Plant Genet Res 21:73–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda Y, Kaga A, Tomooka N, Vaughan DA (2006) Population genetic structure of Japanese wild soybean (Glycine soja) based on microsatellite variation. Mol Ecol 15:959–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Fujita T, Yan ZH, Sakamoto S, Xu D, Abe J (2007) QTL mapping of domestication-related traits in soybean (Glycine max). Ann Bot 100:1027–1038

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu CM, Kato M, Kakihara F (2002) Destiny of a transgene escape from Brassica napus into Brassica rapa. Theor Appl Genet 105:78–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mather K, Jinks JL (1971) Biometrical Genetics. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2000) Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology, No. 15: Consensus Document on the Biology of Glycine max (L.) Merr. (Soybean). http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2000doc.nsf/LinkTo/env-jm-mono(2000)9. Accessed 18 August 2010

  • Peng J, Ronin Y, Fahima T, Roder M, Li Y, Nevo E, Korol A (2003) Domestication quantitative trait loci in Triticum dicoccoides, the progenitor of wheat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2489–2494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song QJ, Marek LF, Shoemaker RC, Lark KG, Concibido VC, Delannay X, Specht JE, Cregan PB (2004) A new integrated genetic linkage map of the soybean. Theor Appl Genet 109:122–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart CN, Halfhill MD, Warwick SI (2003) Transgene introgression from genetically modified crops to their wild relatives. Nat Genet 4:806–817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ooijen JW, Voorrips RE (2001) JoinMap 3.0 software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps. Plant Research International, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S, Tajuddin T, Yamanaka N, Hayashi M, Harada K (2004) Analysis of QTLs for reproductive development and seed quality traits in soybean using recombinant inbred lines. Breed Sci 54:399–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weis AE, Hochberg ME (2000) The diverse effects of intraspecific competition on the selective advantage to resistance: a model and its predictions. Am Nat 156:276–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to give special thanks to Dr. H. Yano and Mr. N. Matsuoka of the Agricultural Research Center for the Western Region for their support in the field. This study was supported by the Research Fund for “Assurance of Safe Use of Genetically Modified Organisms” from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan and the Global Environment Research Fund of the Ministry of the Environment of Japan (FY2003–2005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Ohsawa.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Paul Christou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kitamoto, N., Kaga, A., Kuroda, Y. et al. A model to predict the frequency of integration of fitness-related QTLs from cultivated to wild soybean. Transgenic Res 21, 131–138 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-011-9516-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-011-9516-8

Keywords

Navigation