Abstract
Development of a transgenic porcine biomedical research model requires effective delivery of DNA into the donor cell followed by selection of genetically modified somatic cell lines to be used for nuclear transfer. The objective of the current study was 2-fold: (1) to compare the effectiveness of a single 1 ms pulse of different voltages (V; 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350) and multiple 1 ms pulses (1, 2, 3, 4 or 5) at 300 V for delivery and expression of super-coiled GFP vector in surviving cells of three fetal fibroblast cell lines, and (2) to determine the ability of these electroporation parameters to produce stably transfected fibroblast colonies following G418 selection. Cell line (P < 0.001) and voltage (P < 0.001) affected DNA delivery into the cell as assessed by GFP expression while survival at 24 h was affected by voltage (P < 0.001) and not by cell line (P = 0.797). Using a single pulse while increasing voltage resulted in the percentage of GFP expressing cells increasing from 3.2 ± 0.8% to 43.0 ± 3.4% while survival decreased from 90.5 ± 8.0% to 44.8 ± 2.0%. The number of pulses at 300 V significantly affected survival (P < 0.001) and GFP expression (P < 0.001). Survival steadily decreased following 1–5 pulses from 63.2 ± 6.3% to 3.0 ± 0.3% with GFP expression of surviving cells increasing from 35.6 ± 2.67% to 71.4 ± 6.1%. Electroporation of a selectable marker at a 1:1 copy number ratio to a co-electroporated transgene resulted in 83% of G418 resistant colonies also being PCR positive for the secondary transgene. These electroporation conditions, specifically, three 1 ms pulses of 300 V to 200 μL of 1 × 106 cells/mL in the presence of 12.5 μg DNA/mL effectively introduced DNA into somatic cells. The utilization of these conditions produced numerous transgenic fibroblast colonies following G418 selection that when used for somatic cell nuclear transfer resulted in the production of live offspring.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beebe L, McIlfatrick S, Grupen C, Boquest A, Harrison S, Faast R, Ashman R, Wengle J, Hamilton H, Nottle M (2007) A comparison of two in vitro maturation media for use with adult porcine oocytes for adult somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cloning Stem Cells 9(4):564–570
Brunetti D, Perota A, Lagutina I, Colleoni S, Duchi R, Calabrese F, Seveso M, Cozzi E, Lazzari G, Lucchini F, Galli C (2008) Transgene expression of green fluorescent protein and germ line transmission in cloned pigs derived from in vitro transfected adult fibroblasts. Cloning Stem Cells 10(4):409–419
Dai Y, Vaught TD, Boone J, Chen SH, Phelps CJ, Ball S, Monahan JA, Jobst PM, McCreath KJ, Lamborn AE, Cowell-Lucero JL, Wells KD, Colman A, Polejaeva IA, Ayares DL (2002) Targeted disruption of the alpha1, 3-galactosyltransferase gene in cloned pigs. Nat Biotechnol 20(3):251–255
Dellaire G, Chartrand P (1998) Direct evidence that transgene integration is random in murine cells, implying that naturally occurring double-strand breaks may be distributed similarly within the genome. Radiat Res 149(4):325–329
Hornen N, Kues WA, Carnwath JW, Lucas-Hahn A, Petersen B, Hassel P, Niemann H (2007) Production of viable pigs from fetal somatic stem cells. Cloning Stem Cells 9(3):364–373
Hyun S, Lee G, Kim D, Kim H, Lee S, Nam D, Jeong Y, Kim S, Yeom S, Kang S, Han J, Lee B, Hwang W (2003) Production of nuclear transfer-derived piglets using porcine fetal fibroblasts transfected with the enhanced green fluorescent protein. Biol Reprod 69(3):1060–1068
Kurome M, Tomii R, Ueno S, Hiruma K, Matsumoto S, Okumura K, Nakamura K, Matsumoto M, Kaji Y, Endo F, Nagashima H (2008) Production of cloned pigs from salivary gland-derived progenitor cells. Cloning Stem Cells 10(2):277–286
Lai L, Prather RS (2003) Production of cloned pigs by using somatic cells as donors. Cloning Stem Cells 5(4):233–241
Lai L, Park KW, Cheong HT, Kuhholzer B, Samuel M, Bonk A, Im GS, Rieke A, Day BN, Murphy CN, Carter DB, Prather RS (2002a) Transgenic pig expressing the enhanced green fluorescent protein produced by nuclear transfer using colchicine-treated fibroblasts as donor cells. Mol Reprod Dev 62(3):300–306
Lai LX, Kolber-Simonds D, Park KW, Cheong HT, Greenstein JL, Im GS, Samuel M, Bonk A, Rieke A, Day BN, Murphy CN, Carter DB, Hawley RJ, Prather RS (2002b) Production of alpha-1, 3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs by nuclear transfer cloning. Science 295(5557):1089–1092
Lee SL, Ock SA, Yoo JG, Kumar BM, Choe SY, Rho GJ (2005) Efficiency of gene transfection into donor cells for nuclear transfer of bovine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 72(2):191–200
Nakayama A, Sato M, Shinohara M, Matsubara S, Yokomine T, Akasaka E, Yoshida M, Takao S (2007) Efficient transfection of primarily cultured porcine embryonic fibroblasts using the Amaxa Nucleofection system. Cloning Stem Cells 9(4):523–534
Park KW, Cheong HT, Lai LX, Im GS, Kuhholzer B, Bonk A, Samuel M, Rieke A, Day BN, Murphy CN, Carter DB, Prather RS (2001) Production of nuclear transfer-derived swine that express the enhanced green fluorescent protein. Anim Biotechnol 12(2):173–181
Ramsoondar JJ, Machaty Z, Costa C, Williams BL, Fodor WL, Bondioli KR (2003) Production of alpha 1, 3-galactosyltransferase-knockout cloned pigs expressing human alpha 1, 2-fucosylosyltransferase. Biol Reprod 69(2):437–445
Rogers CS, Hao Y, Roklina T, Samuel M, Stoltz DA, Li Y, Petroff E, Vermeer DW, Kabel AC, Yan Z, Spate L, Wax D, Murphy CN, Rieke A, Whitworth K, Linville ML, Korte SW, Engelhardt JF, Welsh MJ, Prather RS (2008) Production of CFTR-null and CFTR-deltaF508 heterozygous pigs by adeno-associated virus-mediated gene targeting and somatic cell nuclear transfer. J Clin Invest 118(4):1571–1577
Ross JW, Prather RS, Whyte JJ, Zhao J (2009a) Cloning and transgenics: progress and new approaches in domestic animals. CAB reviews: perspectives in agriculture, veterinary science. Nutr Nat Resour 4(38):13
Ross JW, Zhao J, Walters EM, Samuel M, Narfstrom K, Jeong M, DeMarco MA, McCall MA, Kaplan HJ, Prather RS (2009b) Somatic cell nuclear transfer to create a miniature swine model of retinitis pigmentosa, April 18–22, 2009, New Orleans, LA
Tomii R, Kurome M, Ochiai T, Wako N, Ueda H, Hirakawa K, Kano K, Nagashima H (2005) Production of cloned pigs by nuclear transfer of preadipocytes established from adult mature adipocytes. Cloning Stem Cells 7(4):279–288
van den Hoff MJ, Moorman AF, Lamers WH (1992) Electroporation in ‘intracellular’ buffer increases cell survival. Nucleic Acids Res 20(11):2902
Watanabe S, Iwamoto M, Suzuki S, Fuchimoto D, Honma D, Nagai T, Hashimoto M, Yazaki S, Sato M, Onishi A (2005) A novel method for the production of transgenic cloned pigs: electroporation-mediated gene transfer to non-cultured cells and subsequent selection with puromycin. Biol Reprod 72(2):309–315
Wells KD, Powell AM (2000) Blastomeres from somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos are not allocated randomly in chimeric blastocysts. Cloning 2(1):9–22
Whitworth KM, Li R, Spate LD, Wax DM, Rieke A, Whyte JJ, Manandhar G, Sutovsky M, Green JA, Sutovsky P, Prather RS (2009) Method of oocyte activation affects cloning efficiency in pigs. Mol Reprod Dev 76(5):490–500
Zhao J, Ross JW, Hao Y, Spate LD, Walters EM, Samuel MS, Rieke A, Murphy CN, Prather RS (2009) Significant improvement in cloning efficiency of an inbred miniature pig by histone deacetylase inhibitor treatment after somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod 81(3): 525–530
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health National Center for Research Resources U42 RR018877 and Food for the 21st Century at the University of Missouri.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ross, J.W., Whyte, J.J., Zhao, J. et al. Optimization of square-wave electroporation for transfection of porcine fetal fibroblasts. Transgenic Res 19, 611–620 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-009-9345-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-009-9345-1