Skip to main content
Log in

Finance, Nature and Ontology

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper examines connections between ontology and finance. The ontological debates concerning the role of finance are examined between two opposing schools of thought that can be labelled, very broadly, ‘instrumentalist’ and ‘realist’ (analytic-interpretivist). These two schools of thought have had momentous repercussions in understanding what is a good society. Each school defines Nature in particular ways which can be explored using ontology and philosophical insight. Our theoretical investigation aims to accommodate Nature in community financial deliberations. A positive role for government is advocated to finance environmental infrastructure initiatives. For example, precautionary strategies to address climate change must be funded. New roles for finance and government are proposed to align human relationships with Nature. Environmental precautionary principles must be developed in conjunction with finance theory to maintain decent standards of living for all. Reliance on impersonal market forces will not be enough to save the planet given the power of some over the many in the neoliberal arena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use the term ‘analytic-interpreters’ and ‘environmental realism’ to refer to the ideas of Dreyfus, Gadamer, Nussbaum and Taylor.

  2. Pražák (2018) summaries the CAPM as assuming a particular form of utility functions (in which only first and second moments matter, that is risk is measured by variance which is the distribution around the mean). CAPM shows that the cost of equity capital is determined only by beta. In a quadratic utility asset returns whose probability distributions are completely described by the first two moments. For example, the normal distribution and zero transaction costs which is necessary for diversification to eliminate idiosyncratic risk). He states: “[r]isk is often represented by the quantity beta (β) in the financial industry, as well as the expected return of the market and the expected return of a theoretical risk-free asset.”

  3. The language of time preference reflects utilitarian ad hominem frameworks which involve the maximisation of people’s happiness. On the other hand, apodeictic forms of liberalism assume that a decision-structure can be developed and applied to social and ecological problems as they arise.

  4. This section develops work on Prigogine and Stengers (1984) from Lehman (2015). The aim is to explore how thermeodynamics is characterised by non-equilibrium whereas finance works with equilibria. This gap between dissipative structures and financial equilibria is critical to our understanding how to tackle climate change (non-equilibria) in a world of half-understood structural domination.

  5. Norton (2014) is sufficiently post-modernist to argue that ‘truth, as well as value, will be measured against a dynamic criterion of adaptability, rather than against a timeless, realist criterion of objective truth’.

References

  • Abbey R (2001) Charles Taylor. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker M, Schaltegger S (2015) Pragmatism and new directions in social and environmental accountability research. Account Audit Accoun 28:263–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell F, Lehman G (1999) Recent trends in environmental accounting: how green are your accounts? Acc Forum 23(2):175–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1993) The field of cultural production. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (2017) Habitus. Habitus: a sense of place. Routledge, London, pp 59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J (2017) On the need for broadening out and opening up accounting. Positional analysis for sustainable development. Routledge, London, pp 57–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno O, Colyvan M (2011) An inferential conception of the application of mathematics. Noûs 45:345–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun C, LiPuma E, Postone M (1993) Bourdieu: critical perspectives. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB (1982) Humes is/ought dichotomy and the relation of ecology to Leopold’s land ethic. Environ Ethics 4:163–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB (1989) In Defence of the land ethic: essays in environmental philosophy. State University of New York, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB (2017a) Notes on self-realization: an ecological approach to being in the world. Worldviews 21:235–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB (2017b) Japanese environmental philosophy, with James McRae. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh WT (2008) Being consumed: economics and christian desire. Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE (1976) Steady-state economics. Francisco, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE (1992) Allocation, distribution, and scale: towards an economics that is efficient, just and sustainable. Ecol Econ 6:185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin B (2013) Epistemic integrity in accounting: accountants as justifiers in joint epistemic agents”. Bus Prof Ethics J 32:109–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin B (2014a) Epistemically virtuous risk management: financial due diligence and uncovering the madoff fraud. In: Luetge C, Jauernig J (eds) Business ethics and risk management. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 27–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin B (2014b) Ethics management in banking and finance. In: Morris N, Vines D (eds) Capital failure: rebuilding trust in financial services. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 255–276

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin B (2015) Ethics and the global financial crisis. Why incompetence is worse than greed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin B (2016) Pledging Integrity: oaths as forms of business management. J Bus Ethics 136:23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin B (2017) Information as a condition of justice in financial markets: the regulation of credit-rating Agencies. Herzog. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198755661.003.0011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin B (2018) Moral responsibility for large-scale events: the difference between climate change and economic crises. Midwest Stud Philos 42:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicks H (2016) The philosophy of biomimicry. Philos Tech 29:223–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicks H (2018) From Anthropomimetic to biomimetic cities: the Place of humans in ‘cities like forests’. Archit Philos 3:91–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus H, Taylor C (2015) Retrieving realism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Egom PA (2007) Economic mind of god. The Equal Opportunity Publishers, Lagos

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF, French KR (2004) The capital asset pricing model: theory and evidence. J Econ Perspect 18:25–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler B (1997) Pierre Bourdieu and cultural theory. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goede MD (2005) Virtue, fortune, and faith: a genealogy of finance. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild P (2004) Debt, epistemology and ecotheology. Ecotheology 9:151–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild P (2005) Capital and kingdom: an eschatological ontology. In: Davies C, Milbank J, Zižek S (eds) Theology and the political: the new debate. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenfell M, Hardy C (2007) Art rules. Berg, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1992) Further reflections on the public sphere. In: Calhoun C (ed) Habermas and the Public Sphere. The MIT Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1995) Reconciliation through the public use of reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s political liberalism J Philos XCII:109–131

  • Hegel GWF (1967) Philosophy of right. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier J, Rooksby E (eds) (2005) Habitus: a sense of place. Gower Publishing Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchman LP (1994) Aldo Leopold’s hermeneutic of Nature. Rev Polit 57:225–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch F (1976) Social limits to growth. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ippoliti E, Chen P (2017) Methods and finance. A unifying view on finance, mathematics and philosophy. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippoliti E (2017a) Method and finance. A view from inside. In: Chen P, Ippoliti E (eds) Methods and finance. A Unifying view on Finance, Mathematics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, pp 121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippoliti E (2017b) Method and Finance. A view from outside. In: Chen P, Ippoliti E. (eds) Methods and Finance. A Unifying view on Finance, Mathematics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippoliti E (2017c) Dark Data: some methodological issues in Finance. In: Chen P, Ippoliti E. (eds) Methods and Finance. A Unifying view on Finance, Mathematics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, pp 179–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R (1993) Pierre Bourdieu on art, literature and culture. In: Bourdieu P (ed) The field of cultural production: essay in art and literature. Columbia University Press, Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1949) Groundwork on the metaphysics of morals (Originally The moral law). Hutchinson, London

  • Keynes JM (1953) The general theory of employment, interest, and money. Harcourt Bruce Jovanovich Publishers, Orlando Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Koumpis A (2014) Mistakes as shadow capital in human ventures. Int J Adv Corp Learn 7:38–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühn GK (2017) Metaphysics and mathematics: perspectives on reality. Theor Stud 73:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman G (2004a) Social and environmental accounting: trends and thoughts for the future. Account Forum 28:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman G (2004b) Globalisation and the authentic self: cosmopolitanism and Charles Taylor’s communitarianism. Glob Soc 16:419–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman G (2006) Perspectives on Charles Taylor’s reconciled society: community, difference and nature. Philos Soc Crit 32:347–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman G (2014) Moral will, accounting and the phronemos. Crit Perspect Accoun 25:210–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman G (2015) Charles Taylor’s ecological conversations: politics, commonalities and the natural environment. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman G (2017) The language of environmental and social accounting research: the expression of beauty and truth. Crit Perspect Accoun 44:30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1970) A sand country almanac. Sierra Club/Ballantine, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind RC (1982) A Primer on the major issues relating to the discount rate for evaluating energy options. In: Lind RC et al (eds) Discounting for time and risk in energy policy. Resources for the Future, Washington DC, pp 21–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning R (1981) Environmental ethics and John Rawls’ Theory of justice. Environ Ethics 3:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez ML (2007) Habitus: a sense of place—by Jean Hillier and Emma Rooksby. Int J Urban Reg Res 31:495–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishan EJ (1976) Public goods and natural liberty: a comment. In: Wilson T, Skinner AS (eds) The market and the state: essays in honour of Adam Smith. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 289–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen J, Frigg R (2018) Mathematics is not the only language in the book of Nature. Synthese 1:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1526-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton BG (1991) Toward unity among environmentalists. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton BG (1992) Epistemology and environmental values. Monist 75:208–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton BG (1989) Intergenerational equity and environmental decisions: a model using Rawls’ veil of ignorance. Ecol Econ 1:138–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton BG (2014) The preservation of species, vol 430. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson M (1996) Big bills left on the sidewalk: why some nations are rich, and others poor. J Econ Perspect 10:3–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otavio B, Colyvan M (2011) An inferential conception of the application of mathematics. Nous 45:345–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pražák T (2018) The effect of economic factors on performance of the stock market in the Czech Republic. Acta Univ Agric Silvic Mendelianae Brun 66:1613–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preda, A (2017) The Sciences of Finance, Their Boundaries, Their Values. In: Chen P, Ippoliti E. (eds) Methods and Finance. A Unifying view on Finance, Mathematics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, pp 151–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine I (1997) The end of certainty. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine I, Stengers I (1984) Order out of chaos. Fontana Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin P (2016) Journey to earthland. The great transition to planetary civilization. In: Great transition initiative. Tellus Institute, Boston

  • Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1980) Kantian constructivism in moral theory. J Philos LXXVII:515–72

  • Rawls J (1982) The basic liberties and their priority. The tanner lectures on human values. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp 3–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1985) Justice as fairness: political not metaphysical. Roy I Ph S 14:223–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1988) The priority of right and ideas of the good. Roy I Ph S 17:251–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1989) The Domain of the political and overlapping consensus. N Y U Law Rev 64:233–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1970) Collective social choice and social welfare. Oliver and Boyd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1992) Minimal liberty. Economica 59:139–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon J (1994) More people, greater wealth, more resources, healthier environment. Policy 10:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Speck C (2015) Rupert bunny in Paris: playing the field. Aust N Z J Art 15:75–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers I (2010) Cosmopolitics I. University of Minnesota and Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers I (2011) Cosmopolitics II. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoknesa PE, Rockströmbgreen J (2018) Growth within planetary boundaries. Energy Res Soc Sci 44:41–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stretton H (1976) Capitalism, socialism and the environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C (1978) Politics of the steady state. U Q Cult Educ S 32:157–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C (1989a) Sources of the self. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C (1989b) Cross-purposes: the liberal-communitarian debate. In: Rosenblum N (ed) Liberalism and the moral life. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, pp 159–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C (1994) Response to my critics. Philos Phenomen Res 54:203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C (2004) Modern social imaginaries. Duke, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tegmark M (2008) The mathematical universe. Found Phys 38:101–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J (1990) A refutation of environmental ethics. Environ Ethics 12:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wariboko N (2014) The ontology of moral hazard in finance. Economics in spirit and truth. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 57–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watson MC (2014) Derrida, Stengers, Latour, and subalternist cosmopolitics. Theor Cult Soc 31:75–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams PF (1987) The legitimate concern with fairness. Acc Organ Soc 12(2):169–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wissenburg M (2013) Green liberalism: the free and the green society. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zižek S (2012) Less than nothing: hegel and the shadow of dialectical materialism. Verso Books, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No Funding arrangements were made.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glen Lehman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflict of interests.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lehman, G., Mortensen, C. Finance, Nature and Ontology. Topoi 40, 715–724 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-019-09654-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-019-09654-5

Keywords

Navigation