Skip to main content
Log in

Deactivating and Non-Deactivating Coking Found on Ni-Based Catalysts during Combined Steam-Dry Reforming of Methane

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Topics in Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Management of coke formation during the dry reforming (DRM) and combined steam reforming (CSDRM) of methane is a crucial key towards the control of catalyst performance of such processes. Hence, this work provided a fundamental understanding of coke and coking to achieve the desire performance for the Ni-based catalysts typically employed in the industrial via the control over the formation of deactivating coke – amorphous (Cβ), carbide (Cγ), and graphitic coke (CC) that associated directly to the catalyst performance. Therefore, it is demonstrated that during DRM and CSDRM, a low reaction temperature would result in a conversion that is too low to be a practical process, while around 600 °C, the Ni carbide (Cγ) would form in high quantity, and operating up to 800 °C will cause the catalyst performance to drop significantly due high amount of graphitic coke. The CSDRM process compared to DRM can reduce the deactivating coke from 25 – 38% to 2.5 – 21.4% on the Ni-based catalysts. This positive effect on coke-resistant is the elimination of Cβ formation, which is the reactant for the graphitic carbon formation, resulting in a decrease in the overall amount of deactivating coke. Hence, we suggested that one select CSDRM over DRM due to the promotional effect of steam associated with the mitigation of the total deactivating coke via the blocking of amorphous coke formation and the appropriate temperature prevent Cγ and CC formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen C, Wang X, Chen X, Liang X, Zou X, Lu X (2019) Combined steam and CO2 reforming of methane over one-pot prepared Ni/La-Si catalysts. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44(10):4780–4793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Siang TJ, Bach LG, Singh S, Truong QD, Ho VTT, Phúc NFH, Alenazey F, VNJIJoHE VD (2019) Methane bi-reforming over boron-doped Ni/SBA-15 catalyst: longevity evaluation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44:20839–20850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ali S, Khader MM, Almarri MJ, Abdelmoneim AG (2020) Ni-based nano-catalysts for the dry reforming of methane. Catal Today 343:26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2019.04.066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mallikarjun G, Sagar TV, Swapna S, Raju N, Chandrashekar P, Lingaiah N (2020) Hydrogen rich syngas production by bi-reforming of methane with CO2 over Ni supported on CeO2-SrO mixed oxide catalysts. Catal Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2020.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stroud T, Smith TJ, Le Saché E, Santos JL, Centeno MA, Arellano-Garcia H, Odriozola JA, Reina TR (2018) Chemical CO2 recycling via dry and bi reforming of methane using Ni-Sn/Al2O3 and Ni-Sn/CeO2-Al2O3 catalysts. Appl Catal B 224:125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun J, Wang S, Guo Y, Li M, Zou H, Wang Z-j (2018) Carbon dioxide reforming of methane over nanostructured Ni/Al2O3 catalysts. Catal Commun 104:53–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2017.10.021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Argyle MD, Bartholomew CH (2015) Heterogeneous catalyst deactivation and regeneration: a review. Catalysts 5(1):145–269. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal5010145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bartholomew CH (1982) Carbon deposition in steam reforming and methanation. Catal Rev 24(1):67–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602458208079650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Menon PG (1990) Coke on catalysts - harmful, harmless, invisible and beneficial types. J Mol Catal 59(2):207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-5102(90)85053-K

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Arora S, Prasad R (2016) An overview on dry reforming of methane: strategies to reduce carbonaceous deactivation of catalysts. Rsc Adv 6(110):108668–108688. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA20450C

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bereketidou OA, Goula MA (2012) Biogas reforming for syngas production over nickel supported on ceria–alumina catalysts. Catal Today 195(1):93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2012.07.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Seo HO (2018) Recent scientific progress on developing supported Ni catalysts for dry (CO2) reforming of methane. Catalysts 8:110. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8030110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jabbour K, Massiani P, Davidson A, Casale S, El Hassan N (2017) Ordered mesoporous “one-pot” synthesized Ni-Mg(Ca)-Al2O3 as effective and remarkably stable catalysts for combined steam and dry reforming of methane (CSDRM). Appl Catal B 201:527–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan X, Hu T, Liu P, Li S, Zhao B, Zhang Q, Jiao W, Chen S, Wang P, Lu J, Fan L, Deng X, Pan Y-X (2019) Highly efficient and stable Ni/CeO2-SiO2 catalyst for dry reforming of methane: effect of interfacial structure of Ni/CeO2 on SiO2. Appl Catal B 246:221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.070

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the Center of Excellence on Catalysis and Catalytic Reaction Engineering (CECC), Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, and the Graduate School of Chulalongkorn University. The author would also like to thank partial funding from (1) the Grant for Development of New Faculty Staff, Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund, Chulalongkorn University, (2) the Grant for Research Development, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, (3) the Seed Project from the Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand and (4) the Second Century Fund (C2F), Chulalongkorn University and (5) the funding from the Malaysia-Thailand Joint Authority (MTJA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Supareak Praserthdam.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buasuk, N., Saelee, T., Rittiruam, M. et al. Deactivating and Non-Deactivating Coking Found on Ni-Based Catalysts during Combined Steam-Dry Reforming of Methane. Top Catal 64, 357–370 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-021-01413-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-021-01413-4

Keywords

Navigation