Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of Various Pressure Transient Techniques on Permeability Measurement of Unconventional Gas Reservoirs

  • Published:
Transport in Porous Media Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An evaluation of fluid flow behavior in porous media is necessary considering its widespread applications in geo-engineering projects, such as reservoir productivity and hydraulic fracturing. In order to improve the understanding of gas flow characteristics in porous media, particularly permeability estimation of unconventional gas reservoirs, various pressure transient measurement techniques were numerically evaluated in this study based on the established mathematical models, closely representing each experimental design of these transient techniques. Given that both compressive storage and sorption capacity of unconventional reservoirs vary at different pressures, the practicability of the conventional pulse decay method (PDM), initially adopted by Brace et al. (J Geophys Res 73(6):2225–2236, 1968), was examined. The results showed that compressive storage and sorption effect are the limiting factors in the application of the conventional PDM for permeability measurement of sorptive rocks. Meanwhile, the degree to which these factors affect the accuracy of pressure response and permeability were investigated quantitatively. It was found that pulse size, rock porosity, gas compressibility and reservoir volumes are the main parameters influencing compressive storage and sorption effect, and thus the application of the conventional PDM. A comprehensive numerical investigation was also conducted on Metwally and Sondergeld’s technique, a modified PDM, initially proposed for measuring low permeabilities of gas sands and shales. Considering limitations in the derived permeabilities of sorptive rocks when using the conventional PDM techniques and Metwally and Sondergeld’s technique, an optimized PDM was then proposed by creating dual-pressure pulses to avoid the pressure disturbance due to compressive storage, and ad-/de- sorption during the course of measurement. To verify the feasibility of the optimized PDM, a suite of numerical investigation was carried out for various PDM techniques, and the pressure responses were also compared with calculated data obtained from the mathematical model and experimental results. Both numerically calculated and experimental results exhibit the practicality of the optimized PDM, providing a fast, accurate and reliable approach for permeability measurement of sorptive rocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brace, W.F., Walsh, J., Frangos, W.: Permeability of granite under high pressure. J. Geophys. Res. 73(6), 2225–2236 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, X., Bustin, A., Bustin, R.M.: Measurements of gas permeability and diffusivity of tight reservoir rocks: different approaches and their applications. Geofluids 9(3), 208–223 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicker, A., Smits, R.: A practical approach for determining permeability from laboratory pressure-pulse decay measurements. In: International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering 1988. Society of Petroleum Engineers

  • Feng, R., Harpalani, S., Liu, J.: Optimized pressure pulse-decay method for laboratory estimation of gas permeability of sorptive reservoirs: Part 2—Experimental study. Fuel 191, 565–573 (2017a). doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, R., Harpalani, S., Pandey, R.: Evaluation of various pulse-decay laboratory permeability measurement techniques for highly stressed coals. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 50, 297–308 (2016a). doi:10.1007/s00603-016-1109-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, R., Harpalani, S., Pandey, R.: Laboratory measurement of stress-dependent coal permeability using pulse-decay technique and flow modeling with gas depletion. Fuel 177, 76–86 (2016b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, R., Liu, J., Harpalani, S.: Optimized pressure pulse-decay method for laboratory estimation of gas permeability of sorptive reservoirs: Part 1 - Background and numerical analysis. Fuel 191, 555–564 (2017b). doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, M.J.: Alternative approaches for transient-flow laboratory-scale permeametry. Transp. Porous Med. (2016). doi:10.1007/s11242-016-0741-8

  • Harpalani, S., Prusty, B.K., Dutta, P.: Methane/CO\(_2\) sorption modeling for coalbed methane production and CO\(_2\) sequestration. Energy Fuel 20(4), 1591–1599 (2006). doi:10.1021/Ef0504341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, P., Tracy, J., Neuzil, C., Bredehoeft, J., Silliman, S.: A transient laboratory method for determining the hydraulic properties of ‘tight’ rocks–I. Theory. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abst 3, 245–252 (1981)

  • Jones, S.: A technique for faster pulse-decay permeability measurements in tight rocks. SPE Form. Eval. 12(01), 19–26 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamath, J., Boyer, R., Nakagawa, F.: Characterization of core scale heterogeneities using laboratory pressure transients. SPE Form. Eval. 7(03), 219–227 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W.: Compressibility Fluid Flow Through Rocks of Variable Permeability. University of California, California (1977)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W.: Parametric analyses of the transient method of measuring permeability. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth (1978–2012) 87(B2), 1055–1060 (1982)

  • Liu, S., Harpalani, S.: Compressibility of sorptive porous media: Part 2. Experimental study on coal. Aapg Bull. 98(9), 1773–1788 (2014). doi:10.1306/03241413134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metwally, Y.M., Sondergeld, C.H.: Measuring low permeabilities of gas-sands and shales using a pressure transmission technique. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. 48(7), 1135–1144 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, A., Harpalani, S., Liu, S.: Laboratory measurement and modeling of coal permeability with continued methane production: Part 1-Laboratory results. Fuel 94(1), 110–116 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2011.10.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, I., Mansoori, J.: How permeability depends on stress and pore pressure in coalbeds: a new model. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denvor, Colorado, USA 1996. Society of Petroleum Engineers

  • Pan, Z., Connell, L., Camilleri, M.: Laboratory characterisation of coal reservoir permeability for primary and enhanced coalbed methane recovery. Int. J. Coal Geol. 82(3), 252–261 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, H., Cave, S.: Argon gas permeability of New Mexico rock salt under hydrostatic compression. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abst. 5, 281–288 (1980)

  • Walder, J., Nur, A.: Permeability measurement by the pulse-decay method: Effects of poroelastic phenomena and non-linear pore pressure diffusion. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abst. 3, 225–232 (1986)

  • Wang, Y., Liu, S., Elsworth, D.: Laboratory investigations of gas flow behaviors in tight anthracite and evaluation of different pulse-decay methods on permeability estimation. Int. J. Coal Geol. 149, 118–128 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Takahashi, M., Morin, R., Esaki, T.: Evaluation and application of the transient-pulse technique for determining the hydraulic properties of low-permeability rocks—Part 2: experimental application. Geotech. Test. J. 23(1), 91–99 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruimin Feng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, R., Pandey, R. Investigation of Various Pressure Transient Techniques on Permeability Measurement of Unconventional Gas Reservoirs. Transp Porous Med 120, 495–514 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-017-0936-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-017-0936-7

Keywords

Navigation