Skip to main content
Log in

Supercritical CO2-Brine Relative Permeability Experiments in Reservoir Rocks—Literature Review and Recommendations

  • Published:
Transport in Porous Media Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative permeability of carbon dioxide (CO2) to brine influences the injectivity and plume migration when CO2 is injected in a reservoir for CO2 storage or enhanced oil recovery (EOR) purposes. It is common practice to determine the relative permeability of a fluid by means of laboratory measurements. Two principal approaches are used to obtain a relative permeability data: steady state and unsteady state. Although CO2 has been employed in enhanced oil recovery, not much data can be found in the open literature. The few studies available report wide ranges for CO2 relative permeability in typical sedimentary rocks such as Berea sandstone, dolomite, and others. The experimental setups vary for each study, employing steady and unsteady state approaches, different experimental parameters such as temperature, pressure, rock type, etc. and various interpretation methods. Hence, it is inherently difficult to compare the data and determine the origin of differences. It is evident that more experiments are needed to close this knowledge gap on relative permeability. This article concludes that standards for lab measurements need to be defined a. to establish a reliable CO2-brine relative permeability measurement method that can be repeated under the same conditions in any lab and b. to enable comparison of the data to accurately predict the well injection and fluid migration behavior in the reservoir.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abaci S., Edwards J.S., Whittaker B.N.: Relative permeability measurements for two phase flow in unconsolidated sands. Mine Water Environ. 11, 16 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson W.G.: Literature survey. Part 2: wettability measurement. J. Pet. Technol. 38, 1246–1262 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear J.: Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. Dover Pubilications Inc., New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennion, B., Bachu, S.: The Impact of Interfacial Tension and Pore Size Distribution/Capillary Pressure Character on CO2 Relative Permeability at Reservoir Conditions in CO2-Brine Systems, SPE 99325, Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery SPE/DOE Tulsa, Oklahoma, April 22–26, (2006)

  • Bennion B.D., Bachu S.: Drainage and imbibition relative permeability relationships for supercritical CO2/brine and H2S/brine systems in intergranular sandstone, carbonate, shale, and anhydrite rocks. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 11, 487–496 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks R.H., Corey A.T.: Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media, Hydrogeology Papers, pp. 27. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdine N.T.: Relative permeability calculations from pore-size distribution data. Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Eng. Inc. (AIME) 198, 71–78 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch A., Alles S., Gensterblum Y., Prinz D., Dewhurst D.N., Raven M.D., Stanjek H., Krooss B.M.: Carbon dioxide storage potential of shales. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2, 297–308 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalbaud, C., Lombard, J.-M., Martin, F., Robin, M., Bertin, H., Egermann, P.: Two Phase Flow Properties of Brine-CO2 Systems in a Carbonate Core: Influence of Wettability on P c and k r, SPE 111420, Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference SPE/EAGE Abu Dhabi, UAE, October 28–31, (2007)

  • Chiquet P., Daridon J.-L., Broseta D., Thibeau S.: CO2/water interfacial tensions under pressure and temperature conditions of CO2 geological storage. Energy Convers. Manag. 48, 736–744 (2007a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiquet P., Broseta D., Thibeau S.: Wettability alteration of caprock minerals by carbon dioxide. Geofluids 7, 112–122 (2007b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie M.A.: Flow in porous media-scale up of multiphase flow. Curr. Opin. Colloid. Interface Sci. 6, 236–241 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun B.S., Wilkinson G.T.: Interfacial tension in high-pressure carbon dioxide mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 34, 4371–4377 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corey A.T.: The interrelation between gas and oil relative permeabilities. Prod. Mon. 19, 38–41 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dake L.P.: Fundamentals of reservoir engineering. Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co., Amsterdam, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandekar A.Y.: Petroleum Reservoir Rock and Fluid Properties, pp. 488. CRC Press, Boca Raton/FL (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, E.C., Kendall, R.F., Pavelka, E.A., Crocker, M.E.: Equipment and procedures for fluid flow and wettability tests of geological materials, Report, Department of Energy, Bartlesville Energy Technology Center Bartlesville, OK (USA) (1980)

  • Dria D.E., Pope G.A., Sepehrnoori K.: Three-phase gas/oil/brine relative permeabilities measured under CO2 flooding conditions. SPE Reserv. Eng. 20184, 143–150 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dullien F.A.L.: Porous Media: Fluid Transport and Pore Structure. Academic Press Inc., New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Egermann, P., Chalbaud, C., Duquerroix, J.P., Le Gallo, Y.: An Integrated Approach to Parameterize Reservoir Models for CO2 Injection in Aquifers. SPE 102308, San Antonio, TX (2006)

  • Grigg, R.B., Svec, R.K.: Co-injected CO2-Brine Interactions with Indiana Limestone, International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, SCA2003-19, Pau, France (2003)

  • Hadley, G.F., Handy, L.L.: A Theoretical and Experimental Study of the Steady State Capillary End Effect. SPE 707, Los Angeles, California (1956)

  • Hebach A., Oberhof A., Dahmen N., Kögel A., Ederer H., Dinjus E.: Interfacial tension at elevated pressuress measurements and correlations in the water + carbon dioxide system. J. Chem. Eng. Data 47, 1540–1546 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC: IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage—Summary for Policymakers, Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Montreal, Canada, 25 pp (2005)

  • Juanes R., Spiteri E.J., Orr F.M. Jr., Blunt M.J.: Impact of relative permeability hysteresis on geological CO2 storage. Water Resour. Res. 42, 1–13 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, J., Zweers, A., Scherpenisse, W., Wit, K.: Relative Permeability Measurements on Heterogeneous Samples: A Pragmatic Approach. SCA-9909, 11 (1999)

  • Manrique E.J., Muci V.E., Gurfinkel M.E.: EOR field experiences in carbonate reservoirs in the United States. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 10, 667–686 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini L.: Geological Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide—Thermodynamics, Kinetics, and Reaction Path Modeling, p. 453. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mualem Y.: A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour. Res. 12, 513–522 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller N., Qi R., Mackie E., Pruess K., Blunt M.J.: CO2 injection impairment due to halite precipitation. Energy Procedia 1, 3507–3514 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oak M.J., Baker L.E., Thomas C.C.: Three-phase relative permeability of Berea sandstone. J. Pet. Technol. 42, 1054–1061 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, J.-C., Krause, M., Benson, S.M.: Relative Permeability Properties of the CO2/Brine System in Saline Aquifers: An Experimental Study, Seventh Annual Conference on Carbon Capture & Sequestration, Pittsbrugh, p. 22 (2008)

  • Perrin J.-C., Krause M., Kuo C.-W., Miljkovic L., Charoba E., Benson S.M.: Core-scale experimental study of relative permeability properties of CO2 and brine in reservoir rocks. Energy Procedia 1, 3512–3522 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruess K.: The TOUGH codes—a family of simulation tools for multiphase flow and transport processes in permeable media. Vadose Zone J. 3, 738–746 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruess K., Muller N.: Formation dry-out from CO2 injection into saline aquifers. 1. Effects of solids precipitation and their mitigation. Water Resour. Res. 45, 11 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider F.N., Owens W.W.: Sandstone and carbonate two- and three-phase permeability characteristics. SPE J. 10, 75–84 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Spycher N., Pruess K., Ennis-King J.: CO2-H2O mixtures in the geological sequestration of CO2. I. Assessment and calculation of mutual solubilities from 12 to 100°C and up to 600 bar. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 3015–3031 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Genuchten M.T.: A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 892–898 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadja Müller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, N. Supercritical CO2-Brine Relative Permeability Experiments in Reservoir Rocks—Literature Review and Recommendations. Transp Porous Med 87, 367–383 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-010-9689-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-010-9689-2

Keywords

Navigation