Abstract
A wide range of phenotypic variation was observed among neopolyploids obtained from the diploid pear cultivar ‘Fertility’ by in vitro colchicine treatment. The variant plantlets had alterations in leaf characteristics. Neopolyploids had significantly different ratios of leaf length to leaf width compared to the diploid control. Shoot regeneration from leaf explants and rooting ability from in vitro shoots of neopolyploids was examined. Regeneration frequencies of shoots from leaf explants of seven of the nine neopolyploids were significantly decreased compared to the diploid control. The organogenic potential of neopolyploids was highly genotype-dependent for both shoots and roots. Tetraploid clone 4x − 4 failed to regenerate shoots from leaf explants and the pentaploid clone 5x − 2 failed to root from in vitro shoots. The results suggest that polyploidization caused the decrease in or loss of in vitro organogenic potential. Regenerated shoots derived from neopolyploids showed different phenotypes, depending on the ploidy of the donor plant.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Qaoud H, Skirvin RM, Below FE (1991) Influence of nitrogen form and NH4 +–N/:NO3 −–N ratios on adventitious shoot formation from pear (Pyrus communis) leaf explants in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 27:315–319
Baster P, Ledwon A, Gliwicka M, Trojanowska A, Gaj MD (2009) Arabidopsis tanmei/emb2757 embryo mutant is defective for in vitro plant morphogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 99:305–312
Bennett MD (2004) Perspectives on polyploidy in plants–ancient and neo. Biol J Linn Soc 82:411–423
Blanc G, Wolfe KH (2004) Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution. Plant Cell 16:1679–1691
Britton DM, Hull JW (1957) Mitotic instability in Rubus. J Hered 48:11–20
Caboni E, Tonelli MG, Lauril P, D’Angelil S, Damiano C (1999) In vitro shoot regeneration from leaves of wild pear. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 59:1–7
Cheng ZM, Korban SS (2011) In vitro ploidy manipulation in the genomics era. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 104:281–282
Colijn-Hooymans CM, Hakkert JC, Jansen J, Custers JBM (1994) Competence for regeneration of cucumber cotyledons is restricted to specific developmental stages. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 39:211–217
Comai L (2005) The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nat Rev Genet 6:836–846. doi:10.1038/nrg1711
Coutos-Thevenot P, Jouanneau JP, Brown S, Petiard V, Guern J (1990) Embryogenic and non-embryogenic cell lines of Daucus carota cloned from meristematic cell clusters: relation with cell ploidy determined by flow cytometry. Plant Cell Rep 8:605–660
Dhooghe E, Laere VK, Eeckhaut T, Leus L, Huylenbroeck VJ (2011) Mitotic chromosome doubling of plant tissues in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 104:359–373
Ewald D, Ulrich K, Naujoks G, Schro¨der MB (2009) Induction of tetraploid poplar and black locust plants using colchicine: chloroplast number as an early marker for selecting polyploids in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 99:353–357
Gao SL, Zhu DN, Cai ZH, Xu DR (1996) Autotetraploid plants from colchicine-treated bud culture of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 47:73–77
Kubalakova M, Dolezel J, Lebeda A (1996) Ploidy instability of embryogenic cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) callus culture. Biologia Plantarum 38(3):475–480
Levin DA (1983) Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. Am Nat 122:1–25
Li GG, Zhang LY, Chen RZ (1992) Phenotypic variation and changes of chromosome number in plantlets regenerated from potato protoplasts. Acta Botanica Sinica 34(9):712–716
Lin H, Carvalho Pd, Kho D, Tai CY, Pierre P, Fink GR, Pellman D (2001) Polyploids require Bik1 for kinetochore-microtubule attachment. J Cell Biol 155:1173–1184
Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS® system for mixed models. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, p 633
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Nitsch JP, Nitsch C (1969) Haploid plants from pollen grains. Science 163:85–87
Osborn TC, Pires JC, Birchler JA, Auger DL, Chen ZJ, Hyeon-Se Lee, Comai L, Madlung A, Doerge RW, Colot V, Martienssen RA (2003) Understanding mechanisms of novel gene expression in polyploids. Trends Genet 19:141–147
Paucã-Comãnescu M, Clevering OA, Hanganu J, Gridin M (1999) Phenotypic differences among ploidy levels of Phragmites australis growing in Romania. Aquat Bot 64:223–234
Pontaroli AC, Camadro EL (2005) Somaclonal variation in Asparagus officinalis plants regenerated by organogenesis from long-term callus cultures. Genet Mol Biol 28:423–430. doi:10.1590/S1415-47572005000300015
Quoirin M, Lepoivre P (1977) Improved media for in vitro culture of Prunus sp. Acta Hort 78:437–442
Ramsey J, Schemske DW (2002) Neopolyploid in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:589–639. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150437
Ramulu KS, Dijkhuis P, Roest S (1983) Phenotypic variation and ploidy level of plants regenerated from protoplasts of tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. ‘Bintje’). Theor Appl Genet 65:329–338
Ranney TG (2006) Polyploidy: from evolution to new plant development. Combined Proceedings International Plant Propagators’ Society 56:137–142
SAS Institute Inc. (1990) SAS® procedures guide, version 6, 3rd edn SAS Institute Inc., Cary, p 705
Saxton AM (1998) A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in proc mixed. In: Proceedings 23rd SAS Users Group Intl, SAS Institute, Cary, 1243–1246
Shao J, Chen C, Deng X (2003) In vitro induction of tetraploid in pomegranate (Punica granatum). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 75:241–246
Stanys V, Staniene G, Siksnianas T (2004) In vitro induction of polyploidy in Ribes. Acta Universitatis Latviensis, Biology 676:235–237
Sun Q, Sun H (1999) Shoot regeneration from in vitro leaf explants of ‘Fertility’ (Pyrus communis L.). Deciduous Fruits 4:9–10
Sun Q, Sun H, Li L, Bell RL (2009a) In vitro colchicine-induced polyploid plantlet production and regeneration from leaf explants of the diploid pear (Pyrus communis L.) cultivar, ‘Fertility’. J Horti Sci Biotechnol 84(5): 548–552
Sun Q, Sun H, Bell RL, Xin L (2009b) Effect of polyvinyl alcohol on in vitro rooting capacity of shoots in pear clones (Pyrus communis L.) of different ploidy. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 99:299–304
Torrey JG (1967) Morphogenesis in relation to chromosomal constitution in long-term plant tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 20(2):265–0275
Tsukaya H (2002) The leaf index: heteroblasty, natural variation, and the genetic control of polar processes of leaf expansion. Plant Cell Physiol 43(4):372–378
Wright KM, Pires JC, Madlung A (2009) Mitotic instability in resynthesized and natural polyploids of the genus Arabidopsis (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 96(9):1656–1664
Wu JH, Mooney P (2002) Autotetraploid tangor plant regeneration from in vitro Citrus somatic embryogenic callus treated with colchicine. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 70:99–104
Yang X, Ye CY, Cheng ZM, Tschaplinski TJ, Wullschleger SD, Yin W, Xia X, Tuskan GA (2011) Genomic aspects of research involving polyploid plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 104:387–397
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Shandong Natural Science Foundation (Y2008D50), Shandong Outstanding Scientist Research Award Project (01DS48) and Shandong Science and Technology Development Plan poject (2008GG2HZ09018).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, Q., Sun, H., Bell, R.L. et al. Variation of phenotype, ploidy level, and organogenic potential of in vitro regenerated polyploids of Pyrus communis . Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 107, 131–140 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-011-9965-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-011-9965-z