Skip to main content
Log in

Propagation of mulberry variety – S54 by synseeds of axillary bud

  • Research note
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Synseeds were produced from aseptic axillary buds of mulberry variety – S54 (Morus indica L.) to investigate their in vitro and ex vitro conversion potential. The synseeds when cultured on Linsmaier and Skoog's basal medium supplemented with 6-benzyl amino purine (8.88 μM) and 2,3,5-tri iodo benzoic acid (2 μM), produced shoots after 21 days exhibiting 48.2±0.60 in vitro conversion response. The synseeds ex␣vitro conversion response was found to be 45.5±0.76 on soilrite mix containing half strength LS nutrients after 21 days of sowing. Further, synseeds stored at 4 °C for 1–4 months resulted in maximum conversion response under both in vitro and ex vitro conditions, followed by development into complete plantlets without any significant loss of conversion potential. Plants regenerated from the synseeds of axillary bud were hardened, acclimatized and established in soil with varying survival frequency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BAP:

6-benzyl amino purine

LSBM:

Linsmaier and Skoog's basal medium

Synseed (s):

synthetic seed (s)

TIBA:

2,3,5-tri iodo benzoic acid

References

  • Bapat VA, Rao PS, (1990) In vivo growth of encapsulated axillary buds of mulberry (Morus indica L.)Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 20:69–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii JA, Slade D, Redenbaugh K, Walker KA, (1987) Artificial seeds for plant propagation Trend. Biotechnol. 5: 335–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii JA, Slade D, Redenbaugh K, (1993) Planting of artificial seeds and somatic embryos. In: Redenbaugh K, (ed.) Synseeds: Application of Synthetic Seeds to Crop Improvement, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 183–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavyashree R, Gayatri MC, Revanasiddaih HM, (2004) Regeneration of encapsulated apical buds of mulberry variety – S54 (Morus indica L.) Sericologia 44(1):83–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur J, Ahuja PS, Lal N, Mathur AK, (1989) Propagation of Valleriana wallichii DC. using encapsulated apical and axial shoot buds Plant Sci. 60:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohyama K & Oka S (1987) Mulberry. In: Bonga JM & Durjan DJ (eds) Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry, Vol 3 (pp 272–284). Martinus-Nijhoff Publ., The Netherlands

  • Pattnaik S, Chand PK, (2000) Morphogenic response of the alginate-encapsulated axillary buds from in vitro shoot cultures of six mulberries Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult. 60: 177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redenbaugh K, Paasch BD, Nichol JW, Kossler ME, Viss PR, Walker KA, (1986) Somatic seeds: encapsulation of asexual plant embryos Biotechnology 4: 797–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redenbaugh K, Slade D, Viss PR, Fujii JA, (1987) Encapsulation of somatic embryos in synthetic seed coats HortScience 22: 803–809

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto Y, Mashiko T, Suzuki A, Kawata H, Iwasaki A, (1992) Development of encapsulation technology for synthetic seeds Acta Hortic. 319: 71–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma TR, Singh BM, Chauhan RS, (1994) Production of disease free encapsulated buds of Zingiber officinale Rosc Plant Cell Rep. 13: 300–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Financial assistance provided by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, to one of the authors R. Kavyashree, is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kavyashree R..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

R., K., M.C., G. & H.M., R. Propagation of mulberry variety – S54 by synseeds of axillary bud. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 84, 245–249 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-005-9022-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-005-9022-x

Keywords

Navigation