Skip to main content
Log in

A Study of in vitro Regeneration in Relation to Doses of Growth Regulators in Hybrids of Upland Cotton

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The frequency of in vitro callus induction and plant regeneration is influenced by several factors, including composition of culture medium, explant source, and the genotype. Crosses between regenerable and non-regenerable upland cotton cultivars were evaluated for hybrid vigour towards regeneration responses, which is consequential in recalcitrant crop species like cotton where regeneration is limited only to a few cultivars. The results indicated that regenerable and non-regenerable parental cultivars had similar potential of producing callus, but differed in producing callus weight and embryogenic calli. Mean performance of crosses, regarding callus induction, callus weight, callus growth rate, percent embryo induction, and percentage of germinating embryos, deviated considerably from the performance of their parents, signifying the presence of hybrid vigour for the expression of these traits. Magnitude of hybrid vigour varied across hormonal levels. Genetic component was evident for all the traits although of lower magnitude. The results indicated that genetic component in the phenotypic expression of callus growth, percentages of embryo induction and germinating embryos was higher than that of callus induction, callus weight and percentage of embryogenic calli. Hormonal concentration in the media had affect on the degree of gene expression responsible for regeneration in upland cotton. Over, partial- and additive-dominance types of gene effects were apparent in the expression of these traits. Genotype × growth regulator level interaction caused considerable variation in the expression of regeneration responses, suggesting that determination of specific level of growth regulator concentration in the medium was necessary for a particular genotype to obtain optimum response. Genotype × explant source interaction was, however, relatively less important. Differences among genotypes for percent embryo induction were clearly evident.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BS Ahloowalia (1982) ArticleTitlePlant regeneration from callus culture in wheat Crop Sci. 22 405–410

    Google Scholar 

  • OL Borges (1987) ArticleTitleDiallel analysis of maize resistance to sorghum downy mildew Crop Sci. 27 178–180

    Google Scholar 

  • DP Cummings CE Green DD Stuthman (1976) ArticleTitleCallus induction and plant regeneration in oats Crop Sci. 16 465–470

    Google Scholar 

  • ALC Dornelles FIF Carvalho LC Federizzi CE Lange CL Handel F Bered (1997) ArticleTitleGenetics of regeneration of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants Braz. J. Genet. 20 293–297

    Google Scholar 

  • GH Davidonis RH Hamilton (1983) ArticleTitlePlant regeneration from callus tissue of Gossypium hirsutum L Plant Sci. Lett. 32 89–93 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0304-4211(83)90102-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J De Buyser JL Marcotte Y Henry (1992) ArticleTitleGenetic analysis of in vitro wheat somatic embryogenesis Euphytica 63 265–270

    Google Scholar 

  • DS Falconer (1989) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics EditionNumber3 Longman Group UK 248–263

    Google Scholar 

  • O Gamborg R Miller K Ojima (1968) ArticleTitleNutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells Exp. Cell Res. 50 151–158 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0014-4827(68)90403-5 Occurrence Handle5650857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CE Green RL Phillips RA Kleese (1974) ArticleTitleTissue culture of maize (Zea mays L.). Initiation, maintenance, and organic growth factors Crop Sci. 14 54–58

    Google Scholar 

  • JJ Hanzel JP Miller MA Brinkman E Fendos (1985) ArticleTitleGenotype and media effects on callus formation and regeneration in barley Crop Sci. 25 27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • C Hartmann Y Hery J De Buyser C Aubry A Rode (1989) ArticleTitleIdentification of new mitochondrial organization in wheat plants regenerated from somatic tissue culture Theor. Appl. Genet. 77 169–175 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00266182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TK Hodges KK Kamo CW Imbrie MR Becwar (1986) ArticleTitleGenotype specificity of somatic embriogenesis and regeneration in maize BioTechnology 4 219–223

    Google Scholar 

  • RC King WD Stansfield (1985) A Dictionary of Genetics EditionNumber3 Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • S Kumar P Sharma D Pental (1998) ArticleTitleA genetic approach to in␣vitro regeneration of non-regenerating cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars Plant Cell Rep. 18 59–63 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002990050532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CE Lange LC Federizzi FIF Carvalho MJ Tavares ALC Dornelles CL Handel (1995) ArticleTitleGenetic analysis of somatic embriogenesis and plant regeneration of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) J. Genet. Breed. 49 219–223

    Google Scholar 

  • MD Lazar PS Baenziger GW Schaeffer (1984) ArticleTitleCombining abilities and heritability of callus formation and plantlet regeneration in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) anther cultures Theor. Appl. Genet. 68 131–134 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00252328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K Marciniak Z Kaczmarek T Adamski M Surma (2003) ArticleTitleThe anther culture response of triticale line x tester progenies Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 8 343–351 Occurrence Handle12813569

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • M.A.A Miah ED Earle GS Khufh (1985) ArticleTitleInheritance of callus formation ability in anther cultures of rice, Oryza sativa L Theor. Appl. Genet. 70 113–116

    Google Scholar 

  • T Murashige F Skoog (1962) ArticleTitleA revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures Physiol. Plant. 15 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • CA Quimio FJ Zapata (1990) ArticleTitleDiallel analysis of callus induction and green-plant regeneration in rice anther culture Crop Sci. 30 188–192

    Google Scholar 

  • MW Rines TJ McCoy (1981) ArticleTitleTissue culture initiation and plant regeneration in hexaploid species of oats Crop Sci. 21 837–842

    Google Scholar 

  • GC Sharma LL Bello VT Sapra (1980) ArticleTitleGenotypic differences in organogenesis from callus of ten triticale lines Euphytica 29 751–754 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00023222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shengwei Jingsan (2000) ArticleTitleRapid plant regeneration from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Chinese Sci. Bull. 45 1771–1773

    Google Scholar 

  • DT Tomes OS Smith (1985) ArticleTitleThe effect of parental genotype on initiation of embryogenic callus from elite maize (Zea mays L.) germoplasm Theor. Appl. Genet. 70 505–509 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00305983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KA Torbert HW Rines DA Somers (1998) ArticleTitleTransformation of oat using mature embryo derived tissue cultures Crop Sci. 38 226–231

    Google Scholar 

  • NL Trolinder Xhixian Chen (1989) ArticleTitleGenotype specificity of the somatic embryogenesis response in cotton Plant Cell Rep. 8 133–136 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00716824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NL Trolinder JR Goodin (1987) ArticleTitleSomatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in Gossypium hirsutum L Plant Cell Rep. 6 231–234 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00268487

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hafeez-ur- Rahman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rauf, S., Rahman, Hu. A Study of in vitro Regeneration in Relation to Doses of Growth Regulators in Hybrids of Upland Cotton. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 83, 209–215 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-005-5770-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-005-5770-x

Key words

Navigation