Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accuracy assessment of pharmacogenetically predictive warfarin dosing algorithms in patients of an academic medical center anticoagulation clinic

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objectives of this retrospective cohort study are to evaluate the accuracy of pharmacogenetic warfarin dosing algorithms in predicting therapeutic dose and to determine if this degree of accuracy warrants the routine use of genotyping to prospectively dose patients newly started on warfarin. Seventy-one patients of an outpatient anticoagulation clinic at an academic medical center who were age 18 years or older on a stable, therapeutic warfarin dose with international normalized ratio (INR) goal between 2.0 and 3.0, and cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 2C9 (CYP2C9) and vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 (VKORC1) genotypes available between January 1, 2007 and September 30, 2008 were included. Six pharmacogenetic warfarin dosing algorithms were identified from the medical literature. Additionally, a 5 mg fixed dose approach was evaluated. Three algorithms, Zhu et al. (Clin Chem 53:1199–1205, 2007), Gage et al. (J Clin Ther 84:326–331, 2008), and International Warfarin Pharmacogenetic Consortium (IWPC) (N Engl J Med 360:753–764, 2009) were similar in the primary accuracy endpoints with mean absolute error (MAE) ranging from 1.7 to 1.8 mg/day and coefficient of determination R 2 from 0.61 to 0.66. However, the Zhu et al. algorithm severely over-predicted dose (defined as ≥2× or ≥2 mg/day more than actual dose) in twice as many (14 vs. 7%) patients as Gage et al. 2008 and IWPC 2009. In conclusion, the algorithms published by Gage et al. 2008 and the IWPC 2009 were the two most accurate pharmacogenetically based equations available in the medical literature in predicting therapeutic warfarin dose in our study population. However, the degree of accuracy demonstrated does not support the routine use of genotyping to prospectively dose all patients newly started on warfarin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lamb E (May 2009) Top 200 drugs of 2008. Pharmacy Times web site. www.pharmacytimes.com/issue/pharmacy/2009/2009-05/RxFocusTop200Drugs-0509. Accessed June 14, 2009

  2. Gage BF, Eby C, Johnson JA et al (2008) Use of pharmacogenetic and clinical factors to predict the therapeutic dose of warfarin. J Clin Ther 84:326–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaminsky LS, Zhang ZY (1997) Human P450 metabolism of warfarin. Pharmacol Ther 73:67–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Higashi MK, Veenstra DL, Kondo LM et al (2002) Association between CYP2C9 genetic variants and anticoagulation-related outcomes during warfarin therapy. JAMA 287:1690–1698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reider MJ, Reiner AP, Gage BF et al (2005) Effect of VKORC1 haplotypes on transcriptional regulation and warfarin dose. N Engl J Med 352:2285–2293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. COUMADIN [warfarin] package insert. Princeton, NJ; August 2007

  7. Gage BF, Eby C, Milligan PE et al (2004) Use of pharmacogenetics and clinical factors to predict the maintenance dose of warfarin. Thromb Haemost 91:87–94

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sconce EA, Khan TI, Wynn HA et al (2005) The impact of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genetic polymorphism and patient characteristics on warfarin dose requirements: proposal for a new dosing regimen. Blood 106:2329–2333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu Y, Shennan M, Reynolds KK et al (2007) Estimation of warfarin maintenance dose based on VKORC1 (-1639G>A) and CYP2C9 genotypes. Clin Chem 53:1199–1205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wadelius M, Chen LY, Lindh JD et al (2008) The largest prospective warfarin-treated cohort supports genetic forecasting. Blood 113:784–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium (2009) Estimation of the warfarin dose with clinical and pharmacogenetic data. N Engl J Med 360:753–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Voora D, Eby C, Linder MW et al (2005) Prospective dosing of warfarin based on cytochrome P-450 2C9 genotype. Thromb Haemost 93:700–705

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kangelaris KN, Bent S, Nussbaum RL et al (2009) Genetic testing before anticoagulation? A systematic review of pharmacogenetic dosing of warfarin. J Gen Intern Med 24:656–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eckman MH, Rosand J, Greenberg SM et al (2009) Cost-effectiveness of using pharmacogenetic information in warfarin dosing for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 150:73–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson JL, Horne BD, Stevens SM et al (2007) Randomized trial of genotype-guided versus standard warfarin dosing in patients initiating oral anticoagulation. Circulation 116:2563–2570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindh JD, Lungren S, Holm L et al (2005) Several-fold increase in risk of overanticoagulation by CYP2C9 mutations. Clin Pharmacol Ther 78:540–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul B. Shaw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaw, P.B., Donovan, J.L., Tran, M.T. et al. Accuracy assessment of pharmacogenetically predictive warfarin dosing algorithms in patients of an academic medical center anticoagulation clinic. J Thromb Thrombolysis 30, 220–225 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-010-0459-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-010-0459-3

Keywords

Navigation