Skip to main content
Log in

Use of D-dimer testing to determine duration of anticoagulation, risk of cardiovascular events and occult cancer after a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism: the extended follow-up of the PROLONG study

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background The PROLONG study showed that D-dimer (D-d) testing could help tailor the duration of anticoagulation after idiopathic venous thromboembolism (VTE). In this report the initial 18 month study follow-up was extended for 1 year. Materials and Methods D-d was measured 1 month after anticoagulation withdrawal for a first episode of idiopathic VTE. Patients with a normal D-d did not resume anticoagulation, while patients with an abnormal D-d were randomized to either resume or not resume treatment. The primary outcome was the composite of recurrent VTE and major bleeding. Secondary end-points were cardiovascular events, newly diagnosed cancers and deaths. Results D-d was abnormal in 222/608 (36.5%) patients. Average follow-up was 2.55 years. Twenty-eight events occurred in the 121 patients who stopped anticoagulation (23.1%, 9.6% person-years) and five in the 101 patients who resumed anticoagulation (5.0%, 2.0% person-years, adjusted hazard ratio-HR = 3.76; P = 0.008). Recurrence rate was higher in patients with abnormal D-d who stopped anticoagulation than in patients with normal D-d (51 events in 386 patients −13.2%; 5% person-years; adjusted HR 1.70; P = 0.045). The adjusted HR ratio associated with normal D-d versus abnormal D-d in patients who resumed anticoagulation was 2.7 (P = 0.042). An abnormal D-d was associated with a non significant higher risk of cardiovascular events and newly diagnosed cancers vs normal D-d. Conclusions Patients with an abnormal D-d at 1 month after withdrawal of VKA have a significant risk of recurrence over a 2.55 year follow-up and they benefit from resuming anticoagulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schulman S, Rhedin AS, Lindmarker P et al (1995) A comparison of six weeks with six months of oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 332:1661–1665. doi:10.1056/NEJM199506223322501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kearon C, Gent M, Hirsh J et al (1999) A comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 340:901–907. doi:10.1056/NEJM199903253401201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Agnelli G, Prandoni P, Santamaria MG et al (2001) Three months versus one year of oral anticoagulant therapy for idiopathic deep venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med 345:165–169. doi:10.1056/NEJM200107193450302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kearon C, Kahn SR, Agnelli G, Goldhaber S, Raskob GE, Comerota AJ (2008) Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic Disease. American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines, 8th Edition. Chest 133:454S–545S. doi:10.1378/chest.08-0658

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heit JA, Mohr DN, Silverstein MD, Petterson TM, Ofallon WM, Melton LJ (2000) Predictors of recurrence after deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism - A population-based cohort study. Arch Intern Med 160:761–768. doi:10.1001/archinte.160.6.761

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Palareti G, Leali N, Coccheri S et al (1996) Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment: an inception- cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT). Italian Study on Complications of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy. Lancet 348:423–428. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)01109-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Kovacs MJ et al (2003) Comparison of low-intensity warfarin therapy with conventional-intensity warfarin therapy for long-term prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 349:631–639. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa035422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Palareti G, Legnani C, Cosmi B, Guazzaloca G, Pancani C, Coccheri S (2002) Risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence: High negative predictive value of D-dimer performed after oral anticoagulation is stopped. Thromb Haemost 87:7–12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Palareti G, Legnani C, Cosmi B et al (2003) Predictive value of D-dimer test for recurrent venous thromboembolism after anticoagulation withdrawal in subjects with a previous idiopathic event and in carriers of congenital thrombophilia. Circulation 108:313–318. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000079162.69615.0F

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eichinger S, Minar E, Bialonczyk C et al (2003) D-dimer levels and risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. JAMA 290:1071–1074. doi:10.1001/jama.290.8.1071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Palareti G, Cosmi B, Legnani C, Tosetto A, Brusi C, Iorio A, Pengo V, Ghirarduzzi A, Pattacini C, Testa S, Lensing AW, Tripodi A PROLONG Investigators (2006) D-dimer testing to determine the duration of anticoagulation therapy. N Engl J Med 355:1780–1789. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 2006; 355:2797. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa054444

  12. Prandoni P, Cogo A, Bernardi E et al (1993) A simple ultrasound approach for detection of recurrent proximal-vein thrombosis. Circulation 88:1730–1735

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cini M, Legnani C, Cavallaroni K, Bettini F, Palareti G (2003) A new rapid bedside assay for D-dimer measurement (Simplify D-dimer) in the diagnostic work-up for deep vein thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 1:2681–2683. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2003.0543d.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wisloff F, Jacobsen EM, Liestol S (2002) Laboratory diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome. Thromb Res 108:263–271. doi:10.1016/S0049-3848(02)00400-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kottke-Marchant K, Duncan A (2002) Antithrombin deficiency: issues in laboratory diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 126:1326–1336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bertina RM, Koeleman BPC, Koster T et al (1994) Mutation in blood coagulation factor v associated with resistance to activated protein C. Nature 369:64–67. doi:10.1038/369064a0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Poort SR, Rosendaal FR, Reitsma PH, Bertina RM (1996) A common genetic variation in the 3′-untranslated region of the prothrombin gene is associated with elevated plasma prothrombin levels and an increase in venous thrombosis. Blood 88:3698–3703

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fedullo PF, Tapson VF (2003) The evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 349:1247–1256. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp035442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kearon C (2003) Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Can Med Assoc J 168:183–194

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thygesen C, Alpert JS (2007) White HD on behalf of the joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHT Task Force for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 28:2525–2538. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stroke prevention and educational awareness diffusion (SPREAD). The italian guidelines for stroke prevention and management. Release 16/02/07 www.spread.it

  22. Kearon C (2007) Indefinite anticoagulation after a first episode of unprovoked venous thromboembolism: yes. J Thromb Haemost 5:2330–2335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shrivastava S, Ridker PM, Glynn RJ, Goldhaber SZ, Moll S, Bounameaux H, Bauer KA, Kessler CM, Cushman M (2006) D-dimer, factor VIII coagulant activity, low-intensity warfarin and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost 4:1208–1214. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01935.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Legnani C, Palareti G, Cosmi B, Cini M, Tosetto A, Tripodi A, PROLONG Investigators (FCSA and Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centers) (2008) Different cut-off values of quantitative D-dimer methods to predict the risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence: a post-hoc analysis of the PROLONG study. Haematologica 93:900–907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics (FCSA) and by the Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation of the University Hospital S. Orsola-Malpighi of Bologna (Coordinating Center), Italy. The Instrumentation Laboratory company (Milan) provided the kits for D-dimer measurement (Clearview Simplify-D dimer test). Disclosure: Drs. Palareti, Cosmi, Legnani, Pengo, Testa, and Tripodi report having been paid lecture fees by the Instrumentation Laboratory company, Milan Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benilde Cosmi.

Additional information

All the authors are for the PROLONG Investigators (on behalf of FCSA, Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics). The PROLONG investigators are listed in the Appendix. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00264277.

Appendix

Appendix

Study sites and investigators (all the participating centers are affiliated in the Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics –FCSA; numbers in parentheses are the numbers of patients who underwent randomization):

Investigators: U.O. Angiologia e Malattie della Coagulazione “Marino Golinelli”, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna—G. Palareti, B. Cosmi, C. Legnani, C. Brusi (148); A.O. Istituti Ospitalieri, Cremona—S. Testa, A. Alatri (79); I° Div. Di Medicina Interna—Centro Emostasi e Trombosi, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio-Emilia—A. Ghirarduzzi, A. Iorio (68); Centro Regionale Malattie Emorragiche e Trombotiche—Div. Ematologia, Ospedale S. Bortolo, Vicenza—A. Tosetto (36); Servizio di Prevenzione e Terapia della Trombosi, Ospedale “Ex Busonera”, Padova—V. Pengo, C. Pegoraro, S. Iliceto (27); Unita’ delle Malattie Tromboemboliche ed Emorragiche, Azienda Policlinico Universitario di Palermo—S. Siragusa (27); Centro Trombosi, A.O. di Careggi Universita’ di Firenze—D. Prisco, D. Poli (26); Modulo Trombosi ed Emostasi—Divisione di Ematologia Talamona, Ospedale Ca’ Granda Niguarda, Milano—F. Baudo (25); Centro Senese Sorveglianza Anticoagulati—Ist. Di Medicina Interna e Geriatria, Policlinico “Le Scotte”, Siena—R. Cappelli (20); Sezione Trasfusionale, Ospedale San Leopoldo Mandic, Merate—N. Erba (18); Centro Trasfusionale e Ambulatorio Emostasi e Trombosi, Ente Ospedaliero di Vimercate Usl 28, Vimercate—L. La Rosa (16); Centro Emostasi, Ospedale Regionale, Parma—C. Pattacini, R. Quintavalla (15); Centro Sorveglinza Anticoagulati—Malattie della Coagulazione e Angiologia Medica—Div. Di Med. Interna, Ospedale “S. Cuore di Gesù”, Gallipoli—L. Ria (14); Laboratorio Analisi—Ambulatorio per il Controllo della Terapia Anticoagulante Orale, Presidio Ospedaliero di Faenza—E. Bucherini (12); Laboratorio Analisi—Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale di Bentivoglio—E. Cerè (11); Centro Emostasi e Trombosi, Ospedale dell’Annunziata, Cosenza—V. Rossi (9); Centro Emostasi e Trombosi, Ospedale degli Infermi, Rimini—E. Tiraferri (9); Servizio Trasfusionale, Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini, Seriate—C. Agazzi, Coffetti (9); Laboratorio di Patologia Clinica, Presidio Ospedaliero S.Maria Incoronata dell’Olmo, Cava dei Tirreni—C. Villani (8); Laboratorio Analisi—Centro Sorveglianza Anticoagulanti, Ospedale Valduce, Como—L. Frigerio (7); Dip.Scienze Biomediche e Terapie Avanzate, Arcispedale S.Anna, Ferrara—G. Scapoli (7); U.O. Medicina Interna, Policlinico Universitario Messina—A. Trifiletti (6); Servizio di Immunoematologia, Ospedale Maria Vittoria, Torino—M. Molinatti (6); Centro Trasfusionale e di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera “Ospedale Treviglio—Caravaggio”, Treviglio—P. Dori Faccini (5); Laboratorio e Serv. Di Coagulazione—Serv. Trasfusionale, Azienda Opedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria—R. Santi (5); Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale Regionale di Treviso—Scannapieco (4); Servizio di Fisiopatologia Vascolare, Casa Di Cura Villa Serena, Citta’ S.Angelo—G. Lessiani (3); Laboratorio Patologia Diagnostica Clinica, Ospedale “G. Iazzolino”, Vibo Valentia—V. Scarmozzino (3); Serv. Di Analisi—Sett. Emostasi, Presidio Ospedaliero S. Leonardo, Castellamare di Stabia—V. Imbimbo (2); Centro per lo Studio delle Coagulopatie a Rischio Trombotico, Osp. Galliera, Genova—A. Schenone (2).

Executive Committee: G. Palareti, B. Cosmi, C. Legnani (Bologna), A. Tosetto (Vicenza), A. Tripodi (Milan), A. Iorio (Reggio Emilia), S. Testa (Cremona).

Adjudication Committee: A. Ghirarduzzi (Reggio Emilia), C. Pattacini (Parma), V. Pengo (Padua).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cosmi, B., Legnani, C., Tosetto, A. et al. Use of D-dimer testing to determine duration of anticoagulation, risk of cardiovascular events and occult cancer after a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism: the extended follow-up of the PROLONG study. J Thromb Thrombolysis 28, 381–388 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-009-0315-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-009-0315-5

Keywords

Navigation