Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Electronic alerts for hospitalized high-VTE risk patients not receiving prophylaxis: a cohort study

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Despite existing consensus guidelines, venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is underused in high-risk hospitalized patients. The present study evaluated the effects of an electronic alert to the responsible physician in a cohort of hospitalized high-risk patients not receiving VTE prophylaxis. Methods The absence of VTE prophylaxis orders in hospitalized patients at high-risk for VTE triggered an electronic alert to the responsible physician. We studied a cohort of 866 patients whose physicians were alerted that their patients were at high-risk but receiving no VTE prophylaxis. The electronic alert recommended that the responsible physician order preventive measures. We followed each patient for 90 days to determine whether imaging-confirmed symptomatic VTE occurred. Results 9,527 patients were identified as high-risk for VTE. 9% (866) were not receiving prophylaxis, compared with 18% in the intervention arm of a previous randomized trial (P < 0.001). In our current cohort study, 82% (713) of patients were Medical Service patients. Physician response to alerts resulted in prophylactic measures for 37.7% of those alerted. Symptomatic VTE at 90 days occurred in 5.1% of patients in the present cohort group. Conclusion Implementation of a computer alert program increased prophylaxis rates. However, the majority of alerted physicians in the cohort study did not order VTE prophylaxis despite the alerts. Therefore, novel strategies must be employed to further improve the use of VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized high-risk patients, especially in Medical Service patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heit JA, Farmer SA, Petterson TM, Bailey KR, Melton JL (2005) Novel risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE): A population based case control study. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 106:Abstract 1618

  2. Cushman M, Tsai A, White R et al (2004) Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in two cohorts: the longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology. Am J Med 117:19–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M (1999) Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the international cooperative pulmonary embolism registry (ICOPER). Lancet 353:1386–1389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nicolaides AN, Fareed J, Kakkar AK et al (2006) Prevention of venous thromboembolism: International Consensus Statement: guidelines compiled in accordance with the scientific evidence. Int Angiol 25:101–161

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geerts WH, Heit JA, Clagett GP et al (2001) Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest 119(Suppl):132S–175S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirsch DR, Ingenito EP, Goldhaber SZ (1995) Prevalence of deep venous thrombosis among patients in medical intensive care. JAMA 274:335–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Keane MG, Ingenito EP, Goldhaber SZ (1994) Utilization of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the medical intensive care unit. Chest 106:13–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldhaber SZ, Dunn K, MacDougall RC (2000) New onset of venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients at Brigham and Women’s Hospital is caused more often by prophylaxis failure than by withholding treatment. Chest 118:1680–1684

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldhaber SZ, Tapson VF (2004) A prospective registry of 5,451 patients with ultrasound-confirmed deep vein thrombosis. Am J Cardiol 93:259–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dexter PR, Perkins S, Overhage JM, Maharry K, Kohler RB, McDonald CJ (2001) A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 345:965–970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Durieux P, Nizard R, Ravaud P, Mounier N, Lepage E (2000) A clinical decision support system for prevention of venous thromboembolism: effect on physician behavior. JAMA 283:2816–2821

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kucher N, Koo S, Quiroz R et al (2005) Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 352:969–977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gocke J (2005) Lower extremity venous ultrasonography. In: Essentials of vascular laboratory diagnosis. Blackwell Publishing pp 184–206

  14. The PIOPED Investigators (1990) Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA 263:2753–2759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schoepf UJ, Goldhaber SZ, Costello P (2004) Spiral computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 109: 2160–2167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A et al (1992) Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 85:462–468

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Roth AJ (1985) Variance of the Kaplan-Meier Estimator and Its Quantiles Under Certain Fixed Censoring Models. The Annals of Statistics 13:1230–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Shaughnessy D, Rose P, Pressley F, Scriven N, Farren T, Nokes T, Arya R (2006) Evaluating the Performance of a Previously Reported Risk Score To Predict Venous Thromboembolism: A VERITY Registry Study. Abstract #716 Blood, vol 108(11), 16 November 2006

  19. Kuperman GJ, Bobb AM, Payne T, Avery AJ, Gandhi TK, Burns G, Classen D, Bates DW (2007) Medication-related Clinical Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems: A Review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 14:29–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weingart SN, Toth M, Sands DZ, Aronson MD, Davis R, Phillips R (2003) Physicians’ Decisions to Override Computerized Drug Alerts in Primary Care. Arch Intern Med 163:2625–2631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Greenwood B, Szumita PM, Levy H, Lilly CM (2007) Error rates among clinical pharmacists in calculating the APACHE II Score. Pharmacotherapy 27:285–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Goldhaber SZ, Turpie AGG (2005) Prevention of venous thromboembolism among hospitalized medical patients. Circulation 111:e1–e3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dentali F, Douketis JD, Gianni M, Lim W, Crowther MA (2007) Meta-analysis: anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. Ann Intern Med 146:278–288

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Turpie AGG, Bauer KA, Eriksson BI, Lassen MR (2002) Fondaparinux vs. enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in major orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis of 4 randomized double-blind studies. Arch Intern Med 162:1833–1840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zurawska U, Parasuraman S (2007) Goldhaber Prevention of Pulmonary Embolism in General Surgery Patients. Circulation 115:e302–e307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Roderick P, Ferris G, Wilson K, Halls H, Jackson D, Collins R, Baigent C (2005) Towards evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic reviews of mechanical methods, oral anticoagulation, dextran and regional anaesthesia as thromboprophylaxis. Health Technol Assess 9:1–78

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Urbankova J, Quiroz R, Kucher N, Goldhaber SZ (2005) Intermittent pneumatic compression and deep vein thrombosis prevention. A meta-analysis in postoperative patients. Thromb Haemost 94:1181–1185

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ash JS, Gorman PN, Seshadri V, Hersh WR (2004) Computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals: results of a 2002 survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11:95–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pharmacy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Steven Baroletti, Kristin Munz, Jonathan Sonis, John Fanikos, Karen Fiumara, Marilyn Paterno & Samuel Z. Goldhaber

Authors
  1. Steven Baroletti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristin Munz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonathan Sonis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John Fanikos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Karen Fiumara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marilyn Paterno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Samuel Z. Goldhaber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Baroletti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baroletti, S., Munz, K., Sonis, J. et al. Electronic alerts for hospitalized high-VTE risk patients not receiving prophylaxis: a cohort study. J Thromb Thrombolysis 25, 146–150 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-007-0081-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-007-0081-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation