Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The use of a HEMOCHRON® JR. HEMONOX™ point of care test in monitoring the anticoagulant effects of enoxaparin during interventional coronary procedures

  • Clinical Trials
  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Enoxaparin is increasingly used for the anticoagulation of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Several reports have suggested the utility of using point of care tests in monitoring the anticoagulation levels of enoxaparin in patients undergoing PCI. The objective of this study was to evaluate a new point-of-care test (POCT) HEMONOX™ in monitoring the anticoagulant effect of enoxaparin in non citrated fresh whole blood samples from patients undergoing elective PCI procedure.

Methods: Following IRB approval, blood samples were obtained from fifty-four patients who received two sequential intravenous doses of enoxaparin; 0.1 mg/kg followed 5 min later by 0.4 mg/kg for a total of 0.5 mg/kg. Blood was drawn at baseline and at 5, 10, 30 and 60 min post first bolus for evaluation in the clot-based POCT HEMONOX, ACT and aPTT and the chromogenic anti-Xa activity assay.

Results: HEMONOX clotting time (CT) at baseline was 62.6 ± 6.2 secs, (n = 32) in healthy donors and statistically higher in PCI patients (71.6 ± 9.1 secs, p = 0.0001). The peak HEMONOX response that was always achieved at 10 min post bolus was >100 secs in all 54 patients, of these 83% yielded CT >150 secs (range: 150–466). There was no detectable anti-Xa activity level at baseline while peak HEMONOX CT corresponded to therapeutic levels (0.85 ± 0.14 U/ml; range: 0.61–1.34). Both HEMONOX CT and anti-Xa level significantly decreased at the time of sheath removal. HEMONOX CT at peak response suggested 3 patient subgroups with different levels of sensitivity to enoxaparin: low, intermediate and high responders. The correlation between anti-Xa activity level and HEMONOX CT was ≥0.85 in each patient subgroup when data from the 3 critical time points; baseline (absence of drug), peak response (10 min post bolus) and sheath removal (60 min post bolus) were analyzed. The correlation diminished to ≥0.83 when the analyses included data from all 5 time points [baseline, 5, 10, 30, and 60 min post bolus]. The HEMONOX test was the most sensitive POCT to measure the anticoagulant effects of enoxaparin. All patients completed PCI successfully.

Conclusion: The HEMONOX test may be able to guide anticoagulation with enoxaparin during PCI.

Abbreviated abstract

The HEMONOX assay is a one step whole blood coagulation test performed on the HEMOCHRON® Jr. Signature + POC system. The method was evaluated to monitor the anticoagulant level of enoxaparin in blood samples from patients undergoing PCI after receiving an intravenous dose of 0.5 mg/kg. The results suggest a clear distinction of HEMONOX CT between the baseline value of untreated patients and patients achieving therapeutic enoxaparin levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen M, Demers C, Gurfinkel EP, et al. (1997) A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for unstable coronary artery disease. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events Study Group (ESSENCE). N Engl J Med 337:447–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Antman EM, McCabe CH, Gurfinkel EP, et al. (1999) Enoxaparin prevents death and cardiac ischemic events in unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction TIMI-11B trial. Circulation 100:1593–1601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goodman SG, Fitchett D, Armstrong PW, Langer A (2003) On behalf of the INTERACT Trial Investigators. The INTegrelin and Enoxaparin Randomized assessment of Acute Coronary syndrome Treatment Trial. Circulation 107:238–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen M (2003) The role of low-molecular-weight heparin in the management of acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:55S–561S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Klein W, Buchwald A, Hillis WS, et al. (1997) Fragmin in unstable angina pectoris or in non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction (the FRIC study). Fragmin in Unstable Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation 4;80:30E–34E

    Google Scholar 

  6. Collet JP, Montalescot G, Lison L, et al. (2001) Percutaneous coronary intervention after subcutaneous enoxaparin pretreatment in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Circulation 103:658–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fox KAA, Antman EM, Cohen M, Bigonzi F (2002) For the ESSENCE/TIMI 11B Investigators. Comparison of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with unstable angina pectoris/non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction having subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 90:47–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aslam MS, Sundberg S, Sabri MN, Cooke D, Lakier JB (2002) Pharmacokinetic of intravenous/subcutaneous Enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 57:187–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferguson JJ, Antman EM, Bates ER, et al. (2003) Combining enoxaparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes: final results of the National Investigators Collaborating on Enoxaparin-3 (NICE-3) study. Am Heart J 146:628–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee DS, Bhatt DL, Moliterno DJ, Peacock WF, Ellis SG, Topol EJ (2004) The combination of enoxaparin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and an early invasive approach among acute coronary syndrome patients. J Invasive Cardiol 16:46–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferguson JJ, Califf RM, Antman EM, et al. (2004) Enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an intended early invasive strategy: primary results of the SYNERGY randomized trial. JAMA 292:45–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rabah MM, Premmereur J, Graham M, et al. (1999) Usefulness of intravenous enoxaparin for percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 84:139–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kereiakes DJ, Grines C, Fry E, et al. (2001) For the National Investigators Collaborating on Enoxaparin. Enoxaparin and abciximab adjunctive pharmacotherapy during percutaneous coronary intervention: The NICE 1 and NICE 4 trials. J Invasive Cardiology 13:272–278

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen WH, Lau CP, Lau YK, et al. (2002) Stable and optimal anticoagulation is achieved with a single dose of intravenous enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol 14:439–442

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Choussat R, Montalescot G, Collet JP, et al. (2002) A unique, low dose of intravenous enoxaparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 40:1943–1950

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wong GC, Giugliano RP, Antman EM (2003) Use of low-molecular-weight heparins in the management of acute coronary artery syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 289:331–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bhatt DL, Lee BI, Casterella PJ, et al. (2003) Safety of concomitant therapy with eptifibatide and enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Coronary Revascularization Using Integrilin and Single bolus Enoxaparin Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:20–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Carnendran L, Borkowski R, Markabawi B, Warner MF (2003) Safety and efficacy of low-dose intravenous enoxaparin and GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy during PCI. J Invasive Cardiol 15:235–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin JL, Fry ET, Sanderink GJ, et al. (2004) Reliable anticoagulation with enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: The pharmacokinetics of enoxaparin in PCI (PEPCI) study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 61:163–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cziraky MJ, Spinler SA (1993) Low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis. Clin Pharm 12:892–899

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramacciotti E, Araujo GR, Lastoria S, et al. (2004) An open-label, comparative study of the efficacy and safety of once-daily dose of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in the treatment of proximal lower limb deep-vein thrombosis. ThrombRes. 143:149–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marmur JD, Anand SX, Bagga RS, et al. (2003) The activated clotting time can be used to monitor the low molecular weight heparin dalteparin after intravenous administration. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:394–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lawrence M, Mixon TA, Cross D, Gantt DS, Dehmer GJ (2004) Assessment of anticoagulation using activated clotting times in patients receiving intravenous enoxaparin during percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 61:52–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Graf J, Janssens U (2004) Low-molecular weight heparins in percutaneous coronary interventions: current concepts, problems, and perspectives. Curr Pharm Des 10:375–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moliterno DJ, Hermiller JB, Kereiakes DJ, et al. (2003) A novel point-of-care enoxaparin monitor for use during percutaneous coronary intervention. Results of the Evaluating Enoxaparin Clotting Times (ELECT) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:1132–1139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Saw J, Kereiakes DJ, Mahaffey KW, et al. (2003) Evaluation of a novel point-of-care enoxaparin monitor with central laboratory anti-Xa levels. ThrombRes. 112:301–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoppensteadt DA, Jeske W, Fareed J, Bermes EW Jr (1995) The role of tissue factor pathway inhibitor in the mediation of the antithrombotic actions of heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis (Suppl-1):S57–64

  28. (1997) Dose-ranging trial of enoxaparin for unstable angina: results of TIMI 11A. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11A Trial Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 7:1474–1482

  29. Leizorovicz A, Bara L, Samama MM, Haugh MC (1993) Factor Xa inhibition: Correlation between the plasma levels of anti-Xa activity and occurrence of thrombosis and haemorrhage. Haemostasis 23(Suppl 1):89–98

    Google Scholar 

  30. Glenn NL, Fernando T (2004) Degree of anticoagulation after one subcutaneous and one subsequent intravenous booster dose of enoxaparin: implications for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention. J Thromb Thrombolysis 17:167–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sie P, Aillaud MF, de Prost D, et al. (1987) Measurement of low molecular weight heparin ex vivo activities in clinical laboratories using various anti-Xa assays: inter laboratory variability and requirement for an agreed low molecular weight heparin standard. Thromb Haemost 58:879–883

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Depasse F, Gilbert M, Goret V, Rolland N, Samama MM (2000) Anti-Xa monitoring: inter-assay variability. Thromb Haemost 84:1122–1123

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kovacs MJ, Keeney M (2000) Inter-assay and instrument variability of anti-Xa results. Thromb Haemost. 84:138

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gosselin RC, King JH, Janatpour KA, Dager WE, Larkin EC, Owings JT (2004) Variability of plasma anti-Xa activities with different lots of enoxaparin. Ann Pharmacother 38:563–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cohen M, Gonzales A, El Rouby S, et al. (2004) Monitoring of Enoxaparin during Interventional Coronary Procedures Using a HEMOCHRON® Jr. HemonoxTM Point of Care Assay. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 62 No 1 Abstract #C12

  36. Holmes MB, Schneider DJ, Hayes MG, Sobel BE, Mann KG (2000) Novel, bedside, tissue factor-dependent clotting assay permits improved assessment of combination antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy. Circulation 24:102: 2051–2057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Diez J, El Rouby S, Hoppensteadt D, et al. (2005) Evaluation of the Anticoagulant Effect of Enoxaparin Using Clot Based Point of Care Tests. The XXth Congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. J. Thromb Haemost 3, Abstract # 1023

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soumaya El Rouby.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rouby, S.E., Cohen, M., Gonzales, A. et al. The use of a HEMOCHRON® JR. HEMONOX™ point of care test in monitoring the anticoagulant effects of enoxaparin during interventional coronary procedures. J Thromb Thrombolysis 21, 137–145 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-006-4383-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-006-4383-5

Keywords

Navigation