Skip to main content
Log in

Expanding state space and extension of beliefs

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article provides a simple decision theoretic model in which elements of the world successively enter the decision maker’s scope and the state space expands over time, which is intended to be the closest correspondence to the standard subjective expected utility theory. We propose a dynamic consistency condition that after any expansion of the scope, the preference ranking should remain unchanged over acts to which the expansion is irrelevant. Together with other natural axioms, it characterizes a model in which the decision maker’s belief extends over time in order that the marginal distribution of the new belief induced over the old state space coincides with the old belief. It is extended to encompass both expansion of scope and learning events, and we characterize the model with an additional property that the decision maker’s belief updating follows Bayes’ rule when she learns events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn D., Ergin H. (2010) Framing contingencies. Econometrica 78(2): 655–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe F. J., Aumann R. J. (1963) A definition of subjective probability. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 34: 199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Board O., & Chung K. (2007). Object-based unawareness, working paper. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota

  • Dekel E., Lipman B., Rustichini A. (1998) Standard state-space models preclude unawareness. Econometrica 66(1): 159–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekel E., Lipman B., Rustichini A. (1998) Recent developments in modeling unforeseen contingencies. European Economic Review 42(3–5): 523–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein L., Le Breton M. (1993) Dynamically consistent beliefs must be Bayesian. Journal of Economic Theory 61(1): 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein L., Marinacci M., Seo K. (2007) Coarse contingencies and ambiguity. Theoretical Economics 2: 355–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghirardato P. (2002) Revisiting savage in a conditional world. Economic Theory 20: 83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, S., & Quiggin, J. (2007). Awareness and discovery, working paper. Houston: Rice University.

  • Grant, S., & Quiggin, J. (2008). Bounded rationality and small worlds, working paper. Houston: Rice University.

  • Heifetz A., Meier M., Schipper B. (2006) Interactive unawareness. Journal of Economic Theory 130(1): 78–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karni, E., & Viero, M. (2011). gReverse Bayesianismh: A choice-based theory of growing awareness, working paper. Mimeo: Johns Hopkins University

  • Kochov, A. (2009). A model of limited foresight, working paper, University of Rochester. Kingston: Queen’s University

  • Li J. (2009) Information structures with unawareness. Journal of Economic Theory 144: 977–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukerji S. (1997) Understanding the non-additive probability decision model. Economic Theory 9: 23–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage L. (1954) The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, B. (2010). Revealed unawareness, working paper. Davis: University of California.

  • Skiadas C. (1997) Conditioning and aggregation of preferences. Econometrica 65(2): 347–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, R. (2008). State space dimensions and belief updating, working paper. Girona: ITAM, Universitat de Girona.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Hayashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayashi, T. Expanding state space and extension of beliefs. Theory Decis 73, 591–604 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9302-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9302-y

Keywords

Navigation