Abstract
Starting from the premise that firms are distinct in terms of their capacity to create innovations, this article explores the rationale for R&D cooperation and the choice between alliances that involve information sharing, cost sharing or both. Defining innovative capability as the probability of creating an innovation, it examines firm strategy in a duopoly market, where firms have to decide whether or not to cooperate to acquire a fixed cost R&D infrastructure that would endow each firm with a firm-specific innovative capability. Furthermore, since emerging industries are often characterized by high technological uncertainty and diverse firm focus that makes the exploitation of spillovers difficult, this article focuses on a zero spillover context. It demonstrates that asymmetry has an impact on alliance choice and social welfare, as a function of ex-post market competition and fixed costs of R&D. With significant asymmetry no alliance may be formed, while with similar firms the cost sharing alliance is dominant. Finally, it ascertains the settings under which the equilibrium outcome is distinct from that maximizing social welfare, thereby highlighting some conditions under which public investment in a technology park can be justified.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aloysius J. A. (2002) Research joint ventures: A cooperative game for competitors. European Journal of Operational Research 136: 591–602
Amir R., Wooders J. (1999) Effects of one-way spillovers on market shares, industry price, welfare, and R&D cooperation. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 8: 223–249
Arrow K. (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson R.R. (eds) The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors. Universities-National Bureau, Cambridge, pp 609–626
Athreya S., Kale D., Ramani S. V. (2009) Experimentation with strategy and the evolution of dynamic capability in the indian pharmaceutical sector. Industrial and Corporate change 18(4): 729–759
Belderbos R., Carree M., Diederen B., Lokshin B., Veugelers R. (2004) Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organisation 22: 1237–1263
Belderbos R., Carree M., Lokshin B. (2004) Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy 33: 1477–1492
Cabon-Dhersin M. L., Ramani S. V. (2004) Does trust matter for R&D cooperation? A game theoretic examination. Theory and Decision 57: 143–180
Chaudhuri P. (1995) Technological asymmetry and joint product development. International Journal of Industrial Organisation 13: 23–39
D’Aspremont C., Jacquemin A. (1988) Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. American Economic Review 78: 1133–1137
De Man A.-P., Duysters G. (2005) Collaboration and innovation: A review of the effects of mergers, acquisitions and alliances on innovation. Technovation 25(12): 1377–1387
Kamien M. I., Zang I. (2000) Meet me halfway: Research joint ventures and absorptive capacity. International Journal of Industrial Organisation 18: 995–1012
Kamien M., Muller I., Zang I. (1992) Research joint ventures and R&D cartels. American Economic Review 82(5): 1293–1306
Katz M. (1986) An analysis of cooperative research and development. Rand Journal of Economics 17(4): 527–543
Lopez A. (2008) Determinants of R&D cooperation: Evidence from spanish manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Industrial Organisation 26: 113–136
Mills D., Smith W. (1996) It pays to be different, endogenous heterogeneity of firms in an oligopoly. International Journal of Industrial Organization 14: 317–329
Miotti L., Sachwald F. (2003) Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework analysis. Research Policy 32: 1481–1499
Petit M. L., Tolwinski B. (1999) R&D cooperation or competition?. European Economic Review 43: 185–208
Phillimore J., Richard J. (2003) Science parks: A triumph of hype over experience?. In: Shavinina L.V. (eds) The international handbook on innovation. Pergamon, New York, pp 750–757
Poyago-Theotoky J. (1997) Research joint ventures and product innovation: Some welfare aspects. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 5: 51–73
Röller L.-H., Siebert R., Tombak M. M. (2007) Why firms form (or do not form) Rjvs. The Economic Journal 117(522): 1122–1144
Sena V. (2004) The return of the Prince of Denmark: A survey on recent developments in the economics of innovation. The Economic Journal 114(496): 312–332
Van Long N., Soubeyran A. (1999) Asymmetric contributions to research joint ventures. The Japanese Economic Review 50: 122–137
Veugelers R. (1998) Collaborative in R&D: An assessment of theoretical and empirical findings. De Economist 146(3): 419–443
Veugelers R., Kesteloot K. (1996) Bargained shares in joint ventures among asymmetric partners: Is the Matthew effect catalyzing?. Journal of Economics 64(1): 23–51
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mukherjee, V., Ramani, S.V. R&D cooperation in emerging industries, asymmetric innovative capabilities and rationale for technology parks. Theory Decis 71, 373–394 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-009-9184-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-009-9184-9