Skip to main content
Log in

Using Turn Taking to Mitigate Coordination and Conflict Problems in the Repeated Battle of the Sexes Game

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Battle of the Sexes game, which captures both coordination and conflict problems, has been applied to a wide range of situations. We show that, by reducing distributional conflict and enhancing coordination, (eventual) turn taking supported by a “turn taking with independent randomizations” strategy allows players to engage in intertemporal sharing of the gain from cooperation. Using this insight, we decompose the benefit from turn taking into conflict-mitigating and coordination-enhancing components. Our analysis suggests that an equilibrium measure of the “degree of intertemporal conflict” provides an intuitive way to understand the sources of welfare gain from turn taking in the repeated Battle of the Sexes game. We find that when this equilibrium measure is lower, players behave less aggressively and the welfare gain from turn taking is higher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aumann R.J. (1974) Subjectivity and crrelation in randomized strategies. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1:67–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F. (1992) Success and failure in marine coastal fisheries of Turkey. In: Bromley D.W. (ed). Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice, and Policy. San Francisco, Institute for Contemporary Studies, pp. 161–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Besen S., Farrell J. (1994) Choosing how to compete: strategies and tactics in standardization. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(2):117–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar V. (2000) Egalitarianism and efficiency in repeated symmetric games. Games and Economic Behavior 32:247–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein G., Budescu D., Zamir S. (1997) Cooperation in intergroup, N-person, and two-person games of chicken. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41:384–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C. (2003) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper R., DeJong D.V., Forsythe R., Ross T.W. (1989) Communication in the Battle of the Sexes Game: some experimental results. Rand Journal of Economics 20:568–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper R., DeJong D.V., Forsythe R., Ross T.W. (1993) Forward induction in the Battle-of-the-Sexes Games. American Economic Review 83(5):1303–1316

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford V.P., Haller H. (1990) Learning how to cooperate: optimal play in repeated coordination games. Econometrica 58:571–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A., Shapiro C. (1986) Entry dynamics with mixed strategies. In: Thomas L.G. (ed). The Economics of Strategic Planning. Lexington, Lexington Books, pp. 63–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A., Skeath S. (2004) Games of Strategy, Second Edition. New York, W. W. Norton & Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell J. (1987) Cheap Talk, Coordination, and Entry. Rand Journal of Economics 18:34–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell J., Rabin M. (1996) Cheap talk. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10:103–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman J.W. (1994) Introduction and overview. In: Friedman J.W. (ed). Problems of Coordination in Economic Activity. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D., Maskin E. (1986) The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or with incomplete information. Econometrica 54:533–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D., Maskin E. (1991) On the dispensability of public randomization in discounted repeated games. Journal of Economic Theory 53:428–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau S.-H.P. (2001) Aggregate pattern of time-dependent adjustment rules, II: strategic complementarity and endogenous nonsynchronization. Journal of Economic Theory 98:199–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, S.-H.P. and Mui, V.-L. (2006) Using Turn Taking to Mitigate Coordination and Conflict Problems in the Repeated Battle of the Sexes Game, Working Paper, University of Hong Kong and Monash University. (http://www.econ.hku.hk/~pshlau/papers.html).

  • Lau, S.-H.P. and Mui, V.-L. (2007) Turn Taking: Intertemporal Cooperation and Symmetry through Intratemporal Asymmetry, Working Paper, University of Hong Kong and Monash University. (http://www.econ.hku.hk/~pshlau/papers.html).

  • Luce R.D., Raiffa H. (1957) Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller R.A., Sadanand A. (2003) Order of play, forward induction, and presentation effects in two-person games. Experimental Economics 6:5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Gardner, R. and Walker, J. (with Agrawal, A., Blomquist, W., Schlager, E., and Tang, S.Y.) (1994) Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  • Sorin S. (1986) On repeated games with complete information. Mathematics of Operations Research 11:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sau-Him Paul Lau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lau, SH.P., Mui, VL. Using Turn Taking to Mitigate Coordination and Conflict Problems in the Repeated Battle of the Sexes Game. Theory Decis 65, 153–183 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-008-9100-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-008-9100-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation