Skip to main content
Log in

The Evolution of Cooperative Strategies for Asymmetric Social Interactions

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How can cooperation be achieved between self-interested individuals in commonly-occurring asymmetric interactions where agents have different positions? Should agents use the same strategies that are appropriate for symmetric social situations? We explore these questions through the asymmetric interaction captured in the indefinitely repeated investment game (IG). In every period of this game, the first player decides how much of an endowment he wants to invest, then this amount is tripled and passed to the second player, who finally decides how much of the tripled investment she wants to return to the first player. The results of three evolutionary studies demonstrate that the best-performing strategies for this asymmetric game differ from those for a similar but symmetric game, the indefinitely repeated Prisoner’s dilemma game. The strategies that enable cooperation for the asymmetric IG react more sensitively to exploitation, meaning that cooperation can more easily break down. Furthermore, once cooperation has stopped, it is much more difficult to reestablish than in symmetric situations. Based on these results, the presence of asymmetry in an interaction appears to be an important factor affecting adaptive behavior in these common social situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D. Abreu A. Rubinstein (1988) ArticleTitleThe structure of Nash equilibrium in repeated games with finite automata Econometrica 56 1259–1281

    Google Scholar 

  • C. A. Aktipis (2004) ArticleTitleWhen to walk away: contingent movement and the evolution of cooperation Journal of Theoretical Biology 231 249–260 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.06.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. D. Alexander (1987) The Biology of Moral Systems Aldine de Gruyter New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. J. (1981), Survey of repeated games, In Essays in Game Theory and Mathematical Economic in Honor of Oskar Morgenstern, Bibliographisches Institut. Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim, pp. 11–42.

  • R. Axelrod (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation Basic Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Axelrod (1987) The evolution of strategies in the iterated Prisoner’s dilemma L. Davis (Eds) Genetic Algorithms: A Simulated Annealing Pitman London 32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bendor P. Swistak (1998) ArticleTitleEvolutionary equilibria: characterization theorems and their implications Theory and Decision 45 99–159 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005083323183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Berg J. W. Dickhaut K. A. McCabe (1995) ArticleTitleTrust, reciprocity, and social history Games and Economic Behavior 10 122–142 Occurrence Handle10.1006/game.1995.1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Binmore (1994) Game Theory and the Social Contract. Volume 1 Playing fair MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Binmore L. Samuelson (1992) ArticleTitleEvolutionary stability in repeated games played by finite automata Journal of Economic Theory 57 278–305 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-0531(92)90037-I

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Boyd (1989) ArticleTitleMistakes allow evolutionary stability in the repeated Prisoner’s dilemma game Journal of Theoretical Biology 136 47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Boyd J. P. Lorberbaum (1987) ArticleTitleNo pure strategy is evolutionarily stable in the repeated Prisoner’s dilemma game Nature 327 58–59 Occurrence Handle10.1038/327058a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. B. Bugental (2000) ArticleTitleAcquisition of the algorithms of social life: a domain-based approach Psychological Bulletin 126 187–219

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Cohen (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Deutsch (1975) ArticleTitleEquity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues 31 137–149

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Fehr S. Gächter G. Kirchsteiger (1997) ArticleTitleReciprocity as a contract enforcement device: Experimental evidence Econometrica 65 833–860

    Google Scholar 

  • A. P. Fiske (1992) ArticleTitleThe four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations Psychological Review 99 689–723 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Fudenberg J. Tirole (1991) Game Theory MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • D. E. Goldberg (1989) Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning Addison-Wesley Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • D. E. Goldberg K. Deb (1991) A comparison of selection schemes used in genetic algorithms G.J.E. Rawlins (Eds) Foundations of Genetic Algorithms Morgan Kaufmann San Mateo, CA 69–93

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Güth H. Kliemt (2000) ArticleTitleEvolutionarily stable co-operative commitments Theory and Decision 49 197–221 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026570914311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Güth P. Ockenfels M. Wendel (1997) ArticleTitleCooperation based on trust. An experimental investigation Journal of Economic Psychology 18 15–43

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Güth R. Schmittberger R. Schwarz (1982) ArticleTitleAn experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3 367–388 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. A. Hirschfeld S. A. Gelman (Eds) (1994) Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Hoffmann (1999) ArticleTitleThe independent localisations of interaction and learning in the repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma Theory and Decision 47 57–72 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005008122139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Hoffmann (2001) ArticleTitleThe ecology of cooperation Theory and Decision 50 101–118 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010353814597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. E. Hopcroft J. D. Ullman (1979) Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation Addison-Wesley Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kraines V. Kraines (1993) ArticleTitleLearning to cooperate with Pavlov: an adaptive strategy for the iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma with noise Theory and Decision 35 107–150 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01074955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Kraines V. Kraines (1995) ArticleTitleEvolution of learning among Pavlov strategies in a competitive environment with noise Journal of Conflict Resolution 39 439–466

    Google Scholar 

  • J. O. Ledyard (1995) Public goods: a survey of experimental results J. H. Kagel A. E. Roth (Eds) The Handbook of Experimental Economics Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ 111–194

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Leimar (1997) ArticleTitleRepeated games: a state space approach Journal of Theoretical Biology 184 471–498 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jtbi.1996.0286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Lindgren (1991) Evolutionary phenomena in simple dynamics C. G. Langton C. Taylor J. D. Farmer S. Rasmussen (Eds) Artificial Life II Addison-Wesley Reading, MA 295–312

    Google Scholar 

  • B. G. Linster (1992) ArticleTitleEvolutionary stability in the infinitely repeated Prisoner’s dilemma played by two-state Moore machines Southern Economic Journal 58 880–903

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Lorberbaum (1994) ArticleTitleNo strategy is evolutionarily stable in the repeated Prisoner’s dilemma Journal of Theoretical Biology 168 117–130 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jtbi.1994.1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. D. Luce H. Raiffa (1957) Games and Decision Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Marinoff (1990) ArticleTitleThe inapplicability of evolutionarily stable strategy to the Prisoner’s dilemma British Journal of Philosophy of Science 41 461–472

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Maynard Smith (1984) ArticleTitleGame theory and the evolution of behaviour Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 95–125

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Maynard Smith G. R. Price (1973) ArticleTitleThe logic of animal conflict Nature 246 15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Z. Michalewicy (1996) Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs EditionNumber3 Springer Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Mitchell (1996) An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Nelson (1975) ArticleTitleBehaviorism, finite automata, and stimulus theory Theory and Decision 6 249–267 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00136197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Nowak R. M. May (1992) ArticleTitleEvolutionary games and spatial chaos Nature 359 826–829 Occurrence Handle10.1038/359826a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Nowak K. Sigmund (1993) ArticleTitleA strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game Nature 364 56–58 Occurrence Handle10.1038/364056a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Nowak K. Sigmund (1994) ArticleTitleThe alternating Prisoner’s Dilemma Journal of Theoretical Biology 168 219–326 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jtbi.1994.1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Ochs A. Roth (1989) ArticleTitleAn experimental study of sequential bargaining American Economic Review 79 355–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieskamp, J. and Gigerenzer, G. (2005), Heutistics for social interaction: How to generate trust and fairness. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • L. Samuelson (1991) ArticleTitleLimit evolutionarily stable strategies in two-player, normal form games Games and Economic Behavior 3 110–128 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0899-8256(91)90008-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Samuelson (1997) Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • T. C. Schelling (1960) The Strategy of Conflict Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Selten (1983) ArticleTitleEvolutionary stability in extensive two-person games Mathematical Social Sciences 5 269–363 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0165-4896(83)90012-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Selten (1988) ArticleTitleEvolutionary stability in extensive two-person games—Correction and further development Mathematical Social Sciences 16 223–266 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0165-4896(88)90040-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Sober (1992) ArticleTitleStable cooperation in iterated Prisoner’s Dilemmas Economics and Philosophy 8 127–139

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sugden (1986) The Economics of Rights, Cooperation, and Welfare Basil Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Suppes (1969) ArticleTitleStimulus-response theory of finite automata Journal of Mathematical Psychology 6 327–355 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-2496(69)90010-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. L. Trivers (1971) ArticleTitleThe evolution of reciprocal altruism The Quarterly Review of Biology 46 35–57

    Google Scholar 

  • J. B. Huyck ParticleVan R. C. Battalio M. F. Walters (1995) ArticleTitleCommitment versus discretion in the peasant-dictator game Games and Economic Behavior 10 143–170

    Google Scholar 

  • J. W. Weibull (1995) Evolutionary Game Theory MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • H. P. Young D. Foster (1991) ArticleTitleCooperation in the short and in the long run Games and Economic Behavior 3 145–156

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Rieskamp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rieskamp, J., Todd, P.M. The Evolution of Cooperative Strategies for Asymmetric Social Interactions. Theor Decis 60, 69–111 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-005-6014-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-005-6014-6

Keywords

Navigation