Abstract
This paper examines a model in which people’s preferences adjust to changes in their relative ability to attain various goals. Preference changes are modeled as changes in the configuration of weights (or values) attached to these goals. The model permits to explain common prototype changes of preferences such as the ‘sour grapes’ or the ‘overcompensating’ phenomenon. It is found that whether the first or the second phenomenon occurs depends on whether a goal is easy or difficult to substitute by other goals. If two goals are sufficiently strong substitutes for each other, no weight will be placed on that goal which is harder to attain. The results readily apply to the standard microeconomic set-up involving goods and prices, rather than abstract goals and abilities. In this case, one implication of the model is that only a subset of the overall commodity space is relevant for everyday consumer choice, which reduces the complexity of the choice procedure. The model also permits to explain how new and unfamiliar products are incorporated into the consumer’s preference pattern.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akerlof G.A., Kranton R.E. (2000), Economics and Identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics CXV, 715–753.
Aronson E. (1984). The Social Animal, 4th. edn, New York.
G. Becker (1996) Accounting for Tastes Cambridge MA
J. Broome (1992) ArticleTitleA Cause of Preference is not an Object of Preference Social Choice and Welfare 10 57–68
Brunstein J.C. (1993), Personal goals and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65.
B. Caplan (2003) ArticleTitleStigler-Becker versus Myers-Briggs: why preference-based explanations are scientifically meaningful and empirically important Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 50 391–405 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00031-8
Diener E., Fujita F. (1995), Resources, personal strivings, and subjective well-being: A nomothetic and idiographic approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68.
Diener E., Suh E.M., Lucas R.E., Smith H.L. (1999), Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress. Psychological Bulletin 125 (2)
Frey B.S., Stutzer A. (2002), What Can Economists Learn From Happiness Research?. Journal of Economic Literature XL, 402–435.
J.G. March (1978) ArticleTitleBounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice Bell Journal of Economics 9 587–608
Y.-K. Ng J. Wang (2001) ArticleTitleAttitude choice, economic change, and welfare Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 45 279–291 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00146-9
H.A. Simon (1955) ArticleTitleA Behavioral Model of Rational Choice Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 99–118
G.J. Stigler G.S. Becker (1977) ArticleTitleDe Gustibus Non Est Disputandum American Economic Review 67 76–90
C.C. Weizsäcker Particlevon (1971) ArticleTitleNotes on Endogenous Changes of Tastes Journal of Economic Theory 3 345–371 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-0531(71)90037-8
B. Weisbrod (1977) ArticleTitleComparing Utility Functions in Efficiency Terms, or, What Kind of Utility Functions Do We Want? American Economic Review 67 991–995
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Welsch, H. Adaptation of Tastes to Constraints. Theor Decis 57, 379–395 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-005-0283-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-005-0283-y