Skip to main content
Log in

Farsightedness and Cautiousness in Coalition Formation Games with Positive Spillovers

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We adopt the largest consistent set defined by Chwe (1994; J. Econ. Theory 63: 299–325) to predict which coalition structures are possibly stable when players are farsighted. We also introduce a refinement, the largest cautious consistent set, based on the assumption that players are cautious. For games with positive spillovers, many coalition structures may belong to the largest consistent set. The grand coalition, which is the efficient coalition structure, always belongs to the largest consistent set and is the unique one to belong to the largest cautious consistent set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aumann, R. and Drèeze, J. (1974), Cooperative games with coalition structures, International Journal of Game Theory 3, 217-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, D. (1984), Rationalizable strategic behavior, Econometrica 52, 1007-1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, F. (1995), Endogenous structures of association in oligopolies, RAND Journal of Economics 26(3), 537-556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, F. (1996), Sequential formation of coalitions in games with externalities and fixed payoff division, Games and Economic Behavior 14, 90-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, F. (1997), Non-cooperative models of coalition formation in games with spillovers, in Carraro, C. and Siniscalco, D. (eds), New Directions in the Economic Theory of the Environment, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 311-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwe, M.S. (1994), Farsighted coalitional stability, Journal of Economic Theory 63, 299-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa, M.P. and Macho-Stadler, I. (2003), Endogenous formation of competing partnerships with moral hazard, Games and Economic Behavior 44, 183-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. and Kurz, M. (1983), Endogenous formation of coalitions, Econometrica 51, 1047-1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herings, P.J.J. and Vannetelbosch, V. (1999), Refinements of rationalizability for normal-form games, International Journal of Game Theory 28, 53-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi, H., Le Breton, M. and Weber, S. (1999), On coalition-proof Nash equilibria in common agency games, Journal of Economic Theory 85, 122-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D.G. (1984), Rationalizable strategic behavior and the problem of perfection, Econometrica 52, 1029-1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D. and Vohra, R. (1997), Equilibrium binding agreements, Journal of Economic Theory 73, 30-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D. and Vohra, R. (1999), A theory of endogenous coalition structures, Games and Economic Behavior 26, 286-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D. and Vohra, R. (2001), Coalitional power and public goods, Journal of Political Economy 109, 1355-1384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, S.S. (1997), Stable coalition structures with externalities, Games and Economic Behavior 20, 201-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, S.S. and Shin, H. (2000), Endogenous formation of research coalitions with spillovers, International Journal of Industrial Organization 18(2), 229-256.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mauleon, A., Vannetelbosch, V. Farsightedness and Cautiousness in Coalition Formation Games with Positive Spillovers. Theory and Decision 56, 291–324 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-004-2646-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-004-2646-1

Navigation