Skip to main content
Log in

Mote-based underwater sensor networks: opportunities, challenges, and guidelines

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most underwater networks rely on expensive specialized hardware for acoustic communication and modulation. This has impeded wide scale deployments of underwater sensor networks and has forced researchers to use simulations to investigate these systems. To address these issues, this paper examines a system that integrates off-the-shelf acoustic hardware built-in to sensor modules with software modems for establishing underwater acoustic links. Because the hardware in our system is readily available, we have conducted several rounds of field experiments to evaluate it. Building on our recent field experiments in a river, canal, pond, and swimming pool, this paper outlines the technical and logistical challenges for deploying software-driven underwater sensor networks. The design choices include methods for signal modulation at the sender, and symbol synchronization, signal filtering, and signal demodulation at the receiver. We also discuss higher layer communication protocol issues, with a focus on cross-layer optimization, as well as practical solutions to logistical deployment challenges, such as waterproofing and casing, calibration, and fouling. The design guidelines in this paper lay the groundwork for further development of software-driven of underwater sensor networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akyildiz, I. F., Pompili, D., & Melodia, T. (2005). Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 3(3), 257–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. California Sustainable Watershed/Wetland Information Manager available at: http://www.calswim.org.

  3. DSPCOMM available at: www.dspcomm.com.

  4. Fisher, F. H., & Simmons, V. P. (1977). Sound absorption in sea water. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 62, 558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fruehauf, N., & Rice, J. A. (2000). System design aspects of a steerable directional acoustic communications transducer for autonomous undersea systems. In OCEANS (Vol. 1, pp. 565–573). New York: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harris, P., Stojanovic, M., & Zorzi, M. (2006). When underwater acoustic nodes should sleep with one eye open: idle-time power management in underwater sensor networks. In Proc. WUWNet.

  7. Iltis, R. A., Lee, H., et al. (2005). An underwater acoustic telemetry modem for eco-sensing. In Proc. Oceans’05, September, 2005.

  8. Jurdak, R. (2007). Wireless ad hoc and sensor networks: a cross-layer design perspective. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jurdak, R., Lopes, C. V., & Baldi, P. (2006). Software acoustic modems for short range mote-based underwater sensor networks. In Proc. of IEEE Oceans, Singapore, May, 2006.

  10. Jurdak, R., Aguiar, P. M. Q., Baldi, P., & Lopes, C. V. (2007). Software modems for underwater sensor networks. In Proc. of Oceans’07, June, 2007.

  11. Jurdak, R., Ruzzelli, A. G., O’Hare, G. M. P., & Lopes, C. V. (2007). Reliable symbol synchronization in software-driven acoustic networks. In Proc. of IEEE GlobeCom, Washington DC, November, 2007.

  12. Linkquest Inc available at: www.link-quest.com.

  13. Lopes, C. V., & Aguiar, P. (2003). Acoustic modems for ubiquitous computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing.

  14. Partan, J., Kurose, J., & Levine, B. N. (2006). A survey of practical issues in underwater networks. In Proc. WUWNet.

  15. Ruzzelli, A. G., O’Hare, G. M. P., & Jurdak, R. (2008). Merlin: cross-layer integration mac and routing for low duty-cycle sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks. Special issue on energy efficient design in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks, February, 2008.

  16. Sentilla Corporation available at: www.sentilla.com.

  17. The Maya2 Project, http://www.maya-net.org/.

  18. Urick, R. J. (1983). Principles of underwater sound. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Utility Acoustic Modem available at: auvlab.mit.edu.

  20. Vasilescu, I., Kotay, K., Rus, D., Dunbabin, M., & Corke, P. (2005). Data collection, storage, and retrieval with an underwater sensor network. In Proc. Sensys’05, San Diego, CA.

  21. Wills, J., Ye, W., & Heidemann, J. (2006). Low power acoustic modem for dense underwater sensor networks. In Proc. IEEE (WUWNet’06).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raja Jurdak.

Additional information

R. Jurdak’s work is supported by IRCSET Embark Grant.

A.G. Ruzzelli and G.M.P. O’Hare’s work is supported by Science Foundation Ireland under Grant No. 03z/IN.3/1361.

The work of C.V. Lopes was partially supported by US National Science Foundation Grant No. CCF-0347902.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jurdak, R., Ruzzelli, A.G., O’Hare, G.M.P. et al. Mote-based underwater sensor networks: opportunities, challenges, and guidelines. Telecommun Syst 37, 37–47 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-008-9075-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-008-9075-3

Keywords

Navigation