Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanisms revisited

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper defends an interventionist treatment of mechanisms and contrasts this with Waskan (forthcoming). Interventionism embodies a difference-making conception of causation. I contrast such conceptions with geometrical/mechanical or “actualist” conceptions, associating Waskan’s proposals with the latter. It is argued that geometrical/mechanical conceptions of causation cannot replace difference-making conceptions in characterizing the behavior of mechanisms, but that some of the intuitions behind the geometrical/mechanical approach can be captured by thinking in terms of spatio-temporally organized difference-making information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bechtel W. (2006) Discovering cell mechanisms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonawitz L., Ferranti D., Saxe R., Gopnik A., Meltzoff A., Woodward J., Schulz L. (2010) Just do it? Investigating the gap between prediction and action in toddlers’ causal inferences. Cognition 115: 104–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowe P. (2000) Physical causation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall N. (2004) Two concepts of causation. In: Collins J., Hall N., Paul L. Causation and counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

  • Hitchcock C. (1995) Discussion: Salmon on causal relevance. Philosophy of Science 62: 304–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombrozo T. (2010) Causal-explanatory pluralism: How intentions, functions, and mechanisms influence causal ascriptions. Cognitive Psychology 61: 303–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mink J. (1996) The Basal Ganglia: Focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Progress in Neurobiology 50: 381–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon W. (1984) Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlottman A., Shanks D. (1992) Evidence for a distinction between judged and perceived causality. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 44A: 321–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J. (2002) What is a mechanism? A counterfactual account. Philosophy of Science 69: 366–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J. (2003) Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J. (2006) Sensitive and insensitive causation. The Philosophical Review 115: 1–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J. (2010) Causation in biology: Stability, specificity and the choice of levels of explanation. Biology and Philosophy 25: 287–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (forthcoming). Causal perception and causal cognition. In J. Roessler (Ed.), Perception, causation and objectivity: Issues in philosophy and psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Woodward.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woodward, J. Mechanisms revisited. Synthese 183, 409–427 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9870-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9870-3

Keywords

Navigation