Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive ability and the extended cognition thesis

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the ramifications of the extended cognition thesis in the philosophy of mind for contemporary epistemology. In particular, it argues that all theories of knowledge need to accommodate the ability intuition that knowledge involves cognitive ability, but that once this requirement is understood correctly there is no reason why one could not have a conception of cognitive ability that was consistent with the extended cognition thesis. There is thus, surprisingly, a straightforward way of developing our current thinking about knowledge such that it incorporates the extended cognition thesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams F., Aizawa K. (2001) The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology 14: 43–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams F., Aizawa K. (2008) The bounds of cognition. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm R. (1977) Theory of knowledge. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A. (1998) Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A. (2007) Curing cognitive hiccups: A defense of the extended mind. Journal of Philosophy 104: 163–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A. (2008) Memento’s revenge: The extended mind, extended. In: Menary R. (eds) The extended mind. Ashgate Press, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A., Chalmers D. (1998) The extended mind. Analysis 58: 7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowart, M. (2006). Embodied cognition. In B. Dowden & J. Fieser (Eds.), Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Martin, TN: University of Tennessee. http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/embodcog.htm.

  • Gertler B. (2007) Overextending the mind?. In: Gertler B., Shapiro L. (eds) Arguing about mind. Routledge, London, pp 192–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettier E. (1963) Is justified true belief knowledge?. Analysis 23: 121–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A. (1976) Discrimination and perceptual knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy 73: 771–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A. (1986) Epistemology and cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco J. (1999) Agent reliabilism. Philosophical Perspectives 13: 273–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco J. (2000) Putting skeptics in their place: The nature of skeptical arguments and their role in philosophical inquiry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greco J. (2002) Knowledge as credit for true belief. In: DePaul M., Zagzebski L. (eds) Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco J. (2007) The nature of ability and the purpose of knowledge. Philosophical Issues 17: 57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco J. (2008) What’s wrong with contextualism?. The Philosophical Quarterly 58: 416–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco J. (2009) The value problem. In: Haddock A., Millar A., Pritchard D.H. (eds) Epistemic value. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 313–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddock A., Millar A., Pritchard D.H. (2010) The nature and value of knowledge: Three investigations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackey J. (2007) Why we don’t deserve credit for everything we know. Synthese 158: 345–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer K., Cohen S. (1983) Justification, truth, and coherence. Synthese 55: 191–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menary R. (2006) Attacking the bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology 19: 329–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menary R. (2007) Cognitive integration: Mind and cognition unbounded. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Menary, R. (eds) (2008) The extended mind. Ashgate Press, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga A. (1993a) Warrant and proper function. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga A. (1993b) Warrant: The current debate. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard D.H. (2005) Epistemic luck. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard D.H. (2008a) Greco on knowledge: Virtues, contexts, achievements. The Philosophical Quarterly 58: 437–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard D.H. (2008b) Sensitivity, safety, and anti-luck epistemology. In: Greco J. (eds) The Oxford handbook of skepticism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 437–455

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard D.H. (2008c) Virtue epistemology and epistemic luck, revisited. Metaphilosophy 39: 66–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, D. H. (2009a). Anti-luck virtue epistemology. Manuscript.

  • Pritchard D.H. (2009) Apt performance and epistemic value. Philosophical Studies 143: 407–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands M. (1999) The body in mind: Understanding cognitive processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands M. (2009) Extended cognition and the mark of the cognitive. Philosophical Psychology 22: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupert R. (2004) Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition. Journal of Philosophy 101: 389–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa E. (1988) Beyond skepticism, to the best of our knowledge. Mind 97: 153–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa E. (1991) Knowledge in perspective: Selected essays in epistemology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa E. (2007) Apt belief and reflective knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaesen, K. (2009). Knowledge without credit. Manuscript.

  • Zagzebski L. (1996) Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski L. (1999) What is knowledge?. In: Greco J., Sosa E. (eds) Epistemology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 92–116

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duncan Pritchard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pritchard, D. Cognitive ability and the extended cognition thesis. Synthese 175 (Suppl 1), 133–151 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9738-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9738-y

Keywords

Navigation