Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the concept of a stance with that of a paradigm qua disciplinary matrix, in an attempt to illuminate both notions. First, it considers to what extent it is appropriate to draw an analogy between stances (which operate at the level of the individual) and disciplinary matrices (which operate at the level of the community). It suggests that despite first appearances, a disciplinary matrix is not simply a stance writ large. Second, it examines how we might reinterpret disciplinary matrices in terms of stances, and shows how doing so can provide us with a better insight into non-revolutionary science. Finally, it identifies two directions for future research: “Can the rationality of scientific revolutions be understood in terms of the dynamic between stances and paradigms?” and “Do stances help us to understand incommensurability between disciplinary matrices?”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aspect A., Dalibard J., Roger G. (1982) Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time-varying analyzers. Physical Review Letters 49: 1804–1807
Baumann, P. (2009). Empiricism, stances, and the problem of voluntarism. Synthese (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9519-7.
Bell J.S. (1964) On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics 1: 195–200
Bird A. (2000) Thomas Kuhn. Chesham, Acumen
Bird, A. (2004). Thomas Kuhn, In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2004 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2004/entries/thomas-kuhn/.
Bohm D. (1987) Hidden variables and the implicate order. In: Hiley B.J., Peat F.D. (eds) Quantum implications: Essays in honour of David Bohm. Routledge, London
Chakravartty, A. (2009). A puzzle about voluntarism about rational epistemic stances. Synthese (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9516-x.
Cushing J.T. (1994) Quantum mechanics: Historical contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Duhem P.M.M. (1954) The aim and structure of physical theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Einstein A., Podolski B., Rosen N. (1935) Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Physical Review 41: 777
Feyerabend P. (1993) Against method (3rd ed). Verso, London
Hoyningen-Huene P. (1993) Reconstructing scientific revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn’s philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kuhn T.S. (1970a) Logic of discovery or psychology of research?. In: Lakatos I., Musgrave A. (eds) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kuhn T.S. (1970b) Reflection on my critics. In: Lakatos I., Musgrave A. (eds) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kuhn T.S. (1974) Second thoughts on paradigms. In: Suppe F. (eds) The structure of scientific theories. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp 459–482
Kuhn T.S. (1977) The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kuhn T.S. (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed). University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kwiat P. et al (1995) New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs. Physical Review Letter 75: 4337–4341
Lowe, E. J. (2009). The rationality of metaphysics. Synthese (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9514-z.
Masterman M. (1970) The nature of a paradigm. In: Lakatos I., Musgrave A. (eds) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Richardson, A. (2009). But what then am I, this inexhaustible, unfathomable historical self? Or, upon what ground may one commit empiricism? Synthese (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9523-y.
Rowbottom, D. P. (2005). The empirical stance vs. the critical attitude. South African Journal of Philosophy, 24, 200–223. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002450/01/Rowbottom.pdf.
Rowbottom D.P. (2006) Kuhn versus popper on science education: A response to Richard Bailey. Learning for Democracy 2: 45–52
Rowbottom D.P. (2008) Intersubjective corroboration. Studies in the history and philosophy of science 39: 124–132
Rowbottom, D. P. (forthcoming). Popper’s critical rationalism: A philosophical investigation. London: Routledge.
Rowbottom, D. P., & Bueno, O. (2009). How to change it: Modes of engagement, rationality, and stance voluntarism. Synthese (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9521-0.
Teller P. (2004) What is a stance?. Philosophical Studies 121: 159–170
Teller, P. (2009). Learning to live with voluntarism. Synthese (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9517-9.
van Fraassen B.C. (2002) The empirical stance. Yale University Press, New Haven
van Fraassen B.C. (2004a) Précis of The empirical stance. Philosophical Studies 121: 127–132
van Fraassen B.C. (2004b) Replies to discussion on The empirical stance. Philosophical Studies 121: 171–192
von Neumann J. (1932) Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Springer, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rowbottom, D.P. Stances and paradigms: a reflection. Synthese 178, 111–119 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9524-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9524-x