Skip to main content
Log in

Conditionals and indexical relativism

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I set out and defend a view on indicative conditionals that I call “indexical relativism”. The core of the view is that which proposition is (semantically) expressed by an utterance of a conditional is a function of (among other things) the speaker’s context and the assessor’s context. This implies a kind of relativism, namely that a single utterance may be correctly assessed as true by one assessor and false by another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams E. (1998). A primer on probability logic. Palo Alto, CSLI

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley R. (2000). A preservation condition for conditionals. Analysis 60, 219–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen, H. (2008). Content relativism and semantic blindness. In M. Kolbel & M. Garcia-Carpentero (Eds.), Relative truth. Oxford University Press, forthcoming.

  • Egan A., Hawthorne J., Weatherson B. (2005). Epistemic modals in context. In: Preyer G., Peters G. (eds) Contextualism in philosophy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 131–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Einheuser, I. (2007). Three forms of truth-relativism. In M. Garcia-Carpintero & M. Kolbel (Eds.), Relativising utterance truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.

  • Gibbard, A. (1981). Two recent theories of conditionals. In W. Harper, R. Stalnaker, & G. Pearce (Eds.), Ifs (pp. 211–247). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, A. (ms). On truth-conditions for if (but not quite only if).

  • Grice H.P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan D. (1989). Demonstratives. In: Almog J., Perry J., Wettstein H. (eds) Themes from Kaplan. New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 481–563

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J., & Stanley, J. (2005). Semantics, pragmatics, and the role of semantic content. In Z. Szabó (Ed.), Semantics vs. pragmatics (pp. 111–164). Oxford: Oxford University Press (with Jeffrey C. King).

  • Kölbel M. (2004). Indexical relativism vs. Genuine relativism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12, 297–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn P. (2005). Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 28, 643–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford, Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • López de Sa D. (2007a). The many relativisms and the question of disagreement. Forthcoming in International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15, 339–348

    Google Scholar 

  • López de Sa, D. (2007b). Presuppositions of commonality. In M. Garcia-Carpintero & M. Kolbel (Eds.), Relativising utterance truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.

  • López de Sa, D. (ms) (Indexical) Relativism about values: A presuppositional defense.

  • Lycan, W. (1993). MPP, RIP. Philosophical Perspectives.

  • MacFarlane J. (2003). Future contingents and relative truth. The Philosophical Quarterly 53, 321–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane J. (2005). Making sense of relative truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105, 321–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane J. (2007). Semantic minimalism and nonindexical contextualism. In: Preyer G., Peter G. (eds) Context-sensitivity and semantic minimalism: Essays on semantics and pragmatics. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, J. (ms). Non-indexical Contextualism.

  • McGee V. (1985). A counterexample to Modus Ponens. Journal of Philosophy 82, 462–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay T. (2006). Plural predication. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan D. (2003). Defending a possible-worlds account of indicative conditionals. Philosophical Studies 116, 215–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. H. (1989). Binding implicit variables in quantified contexts. In C. Wiltshire, R. Graczyk, & B. Music (Eds.), Papers from the twenty-fifth regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic society (pp. 342–356). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. Reprinted in Partee 2004.

  • Partee B.H. (2004). Compositionality in formal semantics: Selected papers by Barbara H. Partee. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre-McCord G. (1991). Being a realist about relativism (in Ethics). Philosophical Studies 61, 155–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, P. (2003). Indexicality, logophoricity, and plural pronouns. In J. L. Benjamins (Ed.), Research in Afroasiatic Grammar II (pp. 409–428) (Selected Papers from the Fifth Conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Paris, 2000).

  • Stalnaker R. (1975). Indicative conditionals. Philosophia 5, 269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker R. (1981). A defense of conditional excluded middle. In: Harper W., Pearce G., Stalnaker R. (eds) Ifs: Conditionals, belief, decision, chance, and time. Dordrecht, D. Reidel, pp. 87–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley J. (2007). Language in context: Selected essays. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, T. (forthcoming). Judge dependence, epistemic modals, and predicates of personal taste. Forthcoming in Linguistics and Philosophy.

  • Weatherson B. (2001). Indicative and subjunctive conditionals. Philosophical Quarterly 51, 200–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Weatherson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weatherson, B. Conditionals and indexical relativism. Synthese 166, 333–357 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9283-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9283-5

Keywords

Navigation