Skip to main content
Log in

What is it to “B” a relation?

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is two fold: first, I look to show Oaklander’s (The ontology of time. New York: Prometheus Books, 2004) theory of time to be false. Second, I show that the only way to salvage the B-theory is via the adopting of the causal theory of time, and allying this to Oaklander’s claim that tense is to be eliminated. I then raise some concerns with the causal theory of time. My conclusion is that, if one adopts eternalism, the unreality of time looks a better option than the B-theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbour J. (1999). The end of time. London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorr C., Rosen G. (2003). Composition as fiction. In: Gale R.M.(eds) The Blackwell guide to metaphysics. Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 151–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyke H. (2003). Tensed meaning: A tenseless account. Journal of Philosophical Research 28, 65–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk A. (2003). Time plus the whoosh and whiz. In: Jokic A., Smith Q.(eds) Time, tense, and reference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 211–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine K. (2005). Modality and tense. Oxford, Clarendon

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunbaum A. (1971). The meaning of time. In: Freeman E., Sellars W.(eds) Basic issues in the philosophy of time. Open Court, La Sallen, pp. 195–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Poidevin R. (1991). Change, cause, and contradiction: A defence of the tenseless theory of time. New York, St. Martin’s Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (1986). Philosophical papers: Volume II. New York, OUP

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart J.E.M. (1908). The unreality of time. Mind 17, 457–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor D.H. (1981). Real time. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkowski H. (1923). Space and time. In: Lorentz H.(ed) The principle of relativity. London, Methuen, pp. 75–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaklander L.N. (2004). The ontology of time. New York, Prometheus Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons J. (2005). Truthmakers, the past, and the future. In: Beebee H., Dodd J.(eds),Truthmakers: The contemporary debate. Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 161–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Price H. (1996). Time’s arrow and Archimedes’ point: New directions for the physics of time. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam H. (1967). Time and physical geometry. Journal of Philosophy 64, 240–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker S. (1969). Time without change. Journal of Philosophy 66, 363–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallant J.C. (2007). What is B-time?. Analysis 67(2): 147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooley M. (1997). Time, tense, and causation. Oxford, Clarendon

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright C. (1992). Truth and objectivity. London, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Tallant.

Additional information

With thanks to Robin Le Poidevin, Robbie Williams, Andrew McGonigal, Peter Simons, Chris Timpson and an anonymous referee for this journal for comments on a previous draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tallant, J. What is it to “B” a relation?. Synthese 162, 117–132 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9173-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9173-x

Keywords

Navigation