Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Doxastic freedom

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Alston W. (1989). Epistemic justification. Essays in the theory of knowledge. Ithaca, Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett J. (1990). Why is belief involuntary?. Analysis 50, 87–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckareff A. (2006). Doxastic decisions and controlling belief. Acta Analytica 21, 102–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conee E., Feldman R. (2004). Evidentialism. Essays in epistemology. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Double R. (1991). The nonreality of free will. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. (2001). Voluntary belief and epistemic evaluation. In Steup 2001: 77–92.

  • Fischer J.M. (ed) (1986). Moral responsibility. Ithaca, Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J.M., Ravizza M. (1998). Responsibility and control. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. (1971). Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. The Journal of Philosophy, 68, 5–20. Reprinted in Fischer 1986, 65–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger C. (2004). Epistemic deontology, doxastic voluntarism, and the principle of alternate possibilities. In: Löffler W., Weingartner W.P.(eds) Knowledge and Belief. Wissen und Glauben. Wien, Öbvahpt

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane R. (2005). A contemporary introduction to free will. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard B. (2006). Explaining actions with habits. American Philosophical Quarterly 43, 57–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan S. (2003). Doxastic compatibilism and the ethics of belief. Philosophical Studies 114, 47–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoemann F. (ed) (1987). Responsibility, character, and the emotions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Steup, M. (2000). Doxastic voluntarism and epistemic deontology. Acta Analytica, 15, 25–56. Pre-print available on-line at http://web.stcloudstate.edu/msteup/Epis.html#LIN

    Google Scholar 

  • Steup M. (2001). Knowledge, truth, and duty. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson P.F. (1962). Freedom and resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy 48, 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor R. (1992). Metaphysics. Englewood Cliffs,Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Inwagen P. (1993). Metaphycis. Boulder,Westview Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson G. (1975). Free agency. The Journal of Philosophy 72, 205–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters B. (1979). Believing at will. The Journal of Philosophy 76, 243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S. (1980). Asymmetrical freedom. The Journal of Philosophy, 77, 151–66. Reprinted in Fischer 1986, 225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S. (1987). Sanity and the metaphysics of responsibility. In Schoemann 1987, 46–62.

  • Wolf S. (1990). Freedom within reason. Oxford,Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Steup.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steup, M. Doxastic freedom. Synthese 161, 375–392 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9090-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9090-4

Keywords

Navigation