Abstract
This paper argues that the Husserl–Heidegger relationship is systematically misunderstood when framed in terms of a distinction between internalism and externalism. Both philosophers, it is argued, employ the phenomenological reduction to immanence as a fundamental methodological instrument. After first outlining the assumptions regarding inner and outer and the individual and the social from which recent epistemological interpretations of phenomenology begin, I turn to the question of Husserl’s internalism. I argue that Husserl can only be understood as an internalist on the assumption that immanence equates with internal. This, however, is not the case as can be seen once the reduction is understood not as setting aside the existence of the world, but rather a reflection on its meaning. Turning to Heidegger, I argue that his commitment to a form of the phenomenological reduction precludes him from being either a semantic or a social externalist. The place of authenticity and the first person perspective in his work derive from his phenomenological commitments, which can be seen in his accounts of discourse and language and of falling (Verfallen). I then go on to briefly outline a more plausible basis for understanding the difference between Husserl’s and Heidegger’s phenomenologies in terms of their respective emphases on logic and on poetics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernasconi R. (1993). Heidegger in question. The art of existence. Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ, pp. 2–24
Bernet R. (1994). Phenomenological reduction and the double life of the subject. In: Kisiel T., van Buren J. (eds) Reading Heidegger from the start. Essays in his earliest thought. SUNY Press, Albany, pp. 245–267
Burge T. (1986). Individualism and psychology. Philosophical Review 95:3–45
Carman T. (2003). Heidegger’s analytic: Interpretation, discourse and authenticity in Being and Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Crowell S. (2005). Does the Husserl/Heidegger Feud rest on a mistake? An essay on psychological and transcendental phenomenology. Husserl Studies 21:183–206
Dreyfus H. (1982). Husserl’s perceptual noema. In: Dreyfus H., Hall H. (eds) Husserl, intentionality and cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.), pp. 97–124
Dreyfus H. (1991). Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division 1. MIT Press, Cambridge
Føllesdal D. (1982). Husserl’s theory of perception. In: Dreyfus H., Hall H. (eds) Husserl, intentionality and cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.), pp. 93–96
Gadamer, H.-G. (1993). Die Universalität des hermenteutischen Problems. In Gesammelte Werke 2 (pp. 219–231). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck; The universality of the hermeneutical problem. In Philosophical hermeneutics (pp. 3–17). Berkeley: University of California Press (1976).
Heidegger, M. (1978). Brief über den ‘Humanismus’. In Wegmarken (pp. 311–360). Frankfurt: Klosermann; Letter concerning ‘Humanism’. In Pathmarks. Trans. by W. McNeill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1998).
Heidegger M. (1986). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer; Being and Time. Trans. by J. Stambaugh. State University of New York Press (1996), Albany
Heidegger, M. (1988). Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs. Gesamtausgage 20, P. Jaeger (Ed.), Frankfurt: Klostermann; History of the concept of time. Trans. By T. Kisiel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press (1985).
Heidegger, M. (1989a). Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie. Gesamtausgabe 24. Frankfurt: Klosermann; The fundamental problems of phenomenology. Trans. by A. Hofstadter. Bloomington: Indiana University Press (1988).
Heidegger M. (1989b). Hölderlins Hymnen ‘Germanien’ und ‘Der Rhein’. Gesamtausgabe 39. Klosermann, Frankfurt
Heidegger, M. (1990). Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Logik. Gesamtausgabe 26. Frankfurt: Klostermann; The metaphysical foundations of logic. Bloomington: Indiana University Press (1992).
Held, K. (1991). Heimwelt, Fremdwelt, die eine Welt. In E. Orth (Ed.), Phänomenologische Forschungen, 24, pp. 305–337.
Husserl, E. (1950). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie Buch I Husserliana III/1–2. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff; Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First book. Dordrecht: Springer (1983).
Husserl, E. (1952). Ideen zu einer reinen Ph änomenologie und phänomenologische Philosophie Buch II. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff; Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: Second book. Dordrecht: Springer (1990).
Husserl E. (1963). Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag
Husserl, E. (1973). Die Idee der Phänomenologie. W. Biemel (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff; The idea of phenomenology. Trans. by L. Hardy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic (1999).
Husserl, E. (1993). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Ergänzungsband. Texte aus dem Nachlass 1934–1937. Husserliana XXIX. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Trans. by D. Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press (1970).
Husserl, E. (1997). Psychological and transcendental phenomenology and the confrontation with Heidegger (1927–1931) Ed. and Trans. by T. Sheehan & R. Palmer. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Husserl E. (2002). Zur phänomenologischen Reduktion. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1926–1935). Husserliana XXXIV. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Keller P. (1999). Husserl and Heidegger on human experience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lafont C. (2005). Was Heidegger an externalist? Inquiry 48(6):507–532
Luft S. (2002). ‘Phänomenologie der Phänomenologie’. Systematik und Methodologie des Phänomenologie in der Auseinandersetzung zwischen Husserl und Fink. Kluwer, Den Haag
Marion J.-L. (1998). Reduction and givenness Investigations of Husserl, Heidegger and phenomenology. Trans. by Thomas Carlson. Northwestern University Press, Evanston
Merleau-Ponty M. (1945). Phénomenologie de la perception. Gallimard, Paris
Okrent M. (1988). Heidegger’s pragmatism. Understanding, being and the critique of metaphysics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
O’Murchadha F. (1999). Zeit des Handelns und die Möglichkeit der Verwandlung. Kairologie und Chronologie bei Heidegger im Jahrzehnt nach Being and Time. Königshausen und Neumann, Würzburg
Searle J. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Taminiaux, J. (1989a). La réappropriation de l’Ethique à Nicomaque: \(\pi O \acute{i} \eta \sigma \iota \varsigma\) et \(\pi \rho \tilde{a}\xi \iota \varsigma\) dans l’articulation de l’ontologie fondamentale. In Taminaux: Lectures de l’ontologue fondamentale. Essais sur Heidegger (pp. 147–189). Paris: Millon.
Taminiaux J. (1989b). La première lecture de Hölderlin. In: Taminaux J. (ed) Lectures de l’ontologue fondamentale. Essais sur Heidegger. Millon, Paris, pp. 255–278
Volpi, F. (1992). Dasein as praxis: The Heideggerian assimilation and the radicalization of the practical philosophy of Aristotle. In C. Macann (Ed.), Martin Heidegger critical assessments (vol. 2, pp. 90–129). London: Routledge.
Zahavi D. (2004), Husserl’s Noema and the internalism–externalism debate. Inquiry 47(1):42–66
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Murchadha, F. Reduction, externalism and immanence in Husserl and Heidegger. Synthese 160, 375–395 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9085-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9085-1