Abstract
I address the question whether Dummett’s manifestation challenge to semantic realism can be disarmed by reflection on the compositionality of meaning. Building on work of Dummett and Wright, I develop in §§12 what I argue to be the most formidable version of the manifestation challenge. Along the way I review attempts by previous authors to deploy considerations about compositionality in realism’s favour, and argue that they are unsuccessful. The formulation of the challenge I develop renders explicit something which I argue to be implicit in Dummett’s and Wright’s presentations: that the challenge depends on a contention about the constitution of speakers’ states of declarative sentence understanding: i.e., that many such states incorporate abilities to recognize whether the associated sentences’ truth conditions are satisfied. In §3 I argue that reflection on the compositionality of meaning reveals, first, that this contention must be rejected by the realist, and second, that it is unmotivated. This result does not settle the debate over the manifestation challenge, but it implies that the onus of argument does not currently rest with the realist.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appiah, A.: 1985, ’Verification and the Manifestation of Meaning’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp., LIX, pp. 17–31.
A. Appiah (1986) For Truth in Semantics Blackwell Oxford
S. Blackburn (1989) ArticleTitle’Manifesting Realism’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy 14 29–47
R. Bonzon (1992) ArticleTitle’Anti-Anti-Realism’ Philosophical Studies 68 141–169
M. Davies (1986) ’Tacit Knowledge and the Structure of Thought and Language’ C. Travis (Eds) Meaning and Interpretation Blackwell Oxford 127–158
M. Davies (1987) ArticleTitle’Semantic Theory and Tacit Knowledge: Can a Five Per Cent Difference Matter?’ Mind 96 441–462
M. Dummett (1963) ’Realism’, reprinted in his Truth and Other Enigmas Duckworth London 145–165
M. Dummett (1969) ’The Reality of the Past’, reprinted in his Truth and Other Enigmas Duckworth London 358–374
M. Dummett (1973a) Frege: Philosophy of Language Duckworth London
M. Dummett (1973b) ’The Philosophical Basis of Intuitionistic Logic’, reprinted in his Truth and Other Enigmas Duckworth London 215–247
M. Dummett (1976) ’What is a Theory of Meaning? (II)’, reprinted in his The Seas of Language Oxford University Press Oxford 34–93
M. Dummett (1977) Elements of Intuitionism Duckworth London
M. Dummett (1978) ’Preface’, in his Truth and Other Enigmas Duckworth London ix–li
M. Dummett (1991) The Logical Basis of Metaphysics Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
M. Dummett (1993) ’Realism and Anti-realism’, in his The Seas of Language Oxford University Press Oxford 461–478
M. Dummett (1994) ’Reply to Prawitz’ B. McGuinness G. Oliveri (Eds) The Philosophy of Michael Dummett. Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht and London 292–298
Edgington, D.: 1985, ’Verification and the Manifestation of Meaning’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. LIX, 33–52.
G. Evans (1981) ’Semantic Theory and Tacit Knowledge’, reprinted in his Collected Papers Oxford University Press Oxford 322–342
J. Fodor E. Lepore (1992) Holism: A Shopper’s Guide Blackwell Oxford
Q. Gardiner M. (2000) Semantic Challenges to Realism: Dummett and Putnam University of Toronto Press Toronto
B. Hale (1997) ’Realism and its Opponents’ B. Hale C. Wright (Eds) A Companion to the Philosophy of Language Blackwell Oxford
P. Horwich (1998) Meaning Oxford University Press Oxford
J. McDowell (1976) ’Truth-conditions, Bivalence and Verificationism’ G. Evans McDowell (Eds) Truth and Meaning Oxford University Press Oxford 42–66
J. McDowell (1978) ’On ”The Reality of the Past” ’ C. Hookway P. Pettit (Eds) Action and Interpretation. Cambridge University Press Cambridge 127–144
J. McDowell (1981) ’Anti-Realism and the Epistemology of Understanding’ H. Parret J. Bouveresse (Eds) , Meaning and Understanding. Walter de Gruyter Berlin and New York 225–248
A. Miller (2002) ArticleTitle’What is the Manifestation Argument?’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 352–383
C. Peacocke (1992) A Study of Concepts Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
D. Prawitz (1994) ’Meaning Theory and Anti-realism’ B McGuinness G. Oliveri (Eds) The Philosophy of Michael Dummett. Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht and London 79–89
H. Putnam (1975) ’The Meaning of ”Meaning” ’, reprinted in his Collected Papers 2: Mind, Language and Reality Cambridge University Press Cambridge 215–272
P. Strawson (1977) ArticleTitle’Scruton and Wright on Anti-realism etc.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 77 15–22
C. Wright (1976) ’Truth Conditions and Criteria’, reprinted in his Realism, Meaning and Truth, 2nd edn Blackwell Oxford 47–69
C. Wright (1978) ’Anti-realist Semantics: The Role of Criteria’, reprinted in Realism, Meaning and Truth, 2nd edn Blackwell Oxford 357–382
C. Wright (1980) ’Realism, Truth-Value Links, Other Minds and the Past’, reprinted in his Realism, Meaning and Truth, 2nd edn Blackwell Oxford 85–106
C. Wright (1981) ’Anti-realism and Revisionism’, reprinted in his Realism, Meaning and Truth, 2nd edn Blackwell Oxford 433–457
C. Wright (1984) ’Can a Davidsonian Meaning-theory be Construed in terms of Assertibility?’, reprinted in his Realism, Meaning and Truth, 2nd edn Blackwell Oxford 403–432
C. Wright (1987) ’Introduction’, in his Realism, Meaning and Truth, 2nd edn Blackwell Oxford 1–44
C. Wright (1989) ’Misconstruals Made Manifest’, reprinted in his Realism, Meaning and Truth, 2nd edn Blackwell Oxford 239–261
C. Wright (1992) Truth and Objectivity Blackwell Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Byrne, D. Compositionality and the Manifestation Challenge. Synthese 144, 101–136 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-0384-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-0384-8