Abstract
In mean-risk portfolio optimization, it is typically assumed that the assets follow a known distribution P 0, which is estimated from observed data. Aiming at an investment strategy which is robust against possible misspecification of P 0, the portfolio selection problem is solved with respect to the worst-case distribution within a Wasserstein-neighborhood of P 0. We review tractable formulations of the portfolio selection problem under model ambiguity, as it is called in the literature. For instance, it is known that high model ambiguity leads to equally-weighted portfolio diversification. However, it often happens that the marginal distributions of the assets can be estimated with high accuracy, whereas the dependence structure between the assets remains ambiguous. This leads to the problem of portfolio selection under dependence uncertainty. We show that in this case portfolio concentration becomes optimal as the uncertainty with respect to the estimated dependence structure increases. Hence, distributionally robust portfolio optimization can have two very distinct implications: Diversification on the one hand and concentration on the other hand.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aas, K., Puccetti, G.: Bounds for total economic capital: the dnb case study. Extremes 17(4), 693–715 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10687-014-0202-0
Acerbi, C.: Spectral measures of risk: a coherent representation of subjective risk aversion. J. Bank. Financ. 26(7), 1505–1518 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00281-9
Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M., Heath, D.: Coherent measures of risk. Math. Financ. 9(3), 203–228 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9965.00068
Basak, S., Shapiro, A.: Value-at-risk-based risk management: optimal policies and asset prices. Rev. Financ. Stud. 14(2), 371–405 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/14.2.371
Bertsimas, D., Gupta, V., Kallus, N.: Robust SAA. arXiv:1408.4445, p. 617 (2014)
Brandt, M.: Portfolio choice problems. Handbook Financ. Economet. 1, 269–336 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-50897-3.50008-0
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W.: Chance-constrained programming. Manag. Sci. 6(1), 73–79 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.6.1.73
Consigli, G., Kuhn, D., Brandimarte, P.: Optimal Financial Decision Making under Uncertainty, pp. 255–290. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017)
Dantzig, G.B.: Linear programming under uncertainty. Manag. Sci. 1(3-4), 197–206 (1955). https://doi.org/10.2307/2627159
Delage, E., Ye, Y.: Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Oper. Res. 58(3), 595–612 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1090.0741
Denuit, M., Genest, C., Marceau: Stochastic bounds on sums of dependent risks. Insurance: Math. Econ. 25(1), 85–104 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6687(99)00027-X
Doan, X.V., Li, X., Natarajan, K.: Robustness to dependency in portfolio optimization using overlapping marginals. Oper. Res. 63(6), 1468–1488 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2015.1424
Edirisinghe, N.C.P.: Stochastic Programming Approximations Using Limited Moment Information, with Application to Asset Allocation, pp. 97–138. Springer, New York (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1642-6-6
Embrechts, P., Wang, B., Wang, R.: Aggregation-robustness and model uncertainty of regulatory risk measures. Finance Stochast. 19(4), 763–790 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-015-0273-z
Emmer, S., Kratz, M., Tasche, D.: What is the best risk measure in practice? a comparison of standard measures. J. Risk 18(2), 31–60 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2370378
Esfahani, P.M., Kuhn, D. arXiv:1505.05116 (2015)
Fabozzi, F.J., Huang, D., Zhou, G.: Robust portfolios: contributions from operations research and finance. Ann. Oper. Res. 176(1), 191–220 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-009-0515-6
Fermanian, J.D., Radulovic, D., Wegkamp, M.: Weak convergence of empirical copula processes. Bernoulli 10(5), 847–860 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3150/bj/1099579158
Föllmer, H., Schied, A.: Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Finance Stochast. 6(4), 429–447 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s007800200072
Föllmer, H., Schied, A.: Stochastic finance: an introduction in discrete time Walter de Gruyter (2011). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110463453
Fournier, N., Guilin, A.: On the rate of convergence in Wasserstein distance of the empirical measure. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 162, 707–738 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-014-0583-7
Gao, R., Kleywegt, A.J.: Distributionally robust stochastic optimization with Wasserstein distance. arXiv:1604.02199 (2016)
Genest, C., Rémillard, B., Beaudoin, D.: Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: a review and a power study. Insurance: Math. Econ. 44(2), 199–213 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.10.005
Hanasusanto, G.A., Roitch, V., Kuhn, D., Wiesemann, W.: A distributionally robust perspective on uncertainty quantification and chance constrained programming. Math. Program. 151(1), 35–62 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-015-0896-z
Hansen, L.P., Sargent, T.J.: Robust control and model uncertainty. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(2), 60–66 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2307/2677734
Ji, R., Lejeune, M.: Data-driven optimization of ambiguous reward-risk ratio measures. Available at SSRN 2707122 (2015)
Kakouris, I., Rustem, B.: Robust portfolio optimization with copulas. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 235(1), 28–37 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.12.022
Kim, J.H., Kim, W.C., Fabozzi, F.J.: Recent developments in robust portfolios with a worst-case approach. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 161(1), 103–121 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-013-0329-1
Konno, H., Yamazaki, H.: Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its applications to tokyo stock market. Manag. Sci. 37(5), 519–531 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.5.519
Kusuoka, S.: On law invariant coherent risk measures Advances in Mathematical Economics, pp. 83–95. Springer (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-67891-5
Liu, Y., Meskarian, R., Xu, H.: Distributionally robust reward-risk ratio optimization with moment constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 27(2), 957–985 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1137/16M106114X
Lux, T., Papapantoleon, A.: Model-free bounds on value-at-risk using partial dependence information. arXiv:1610.09734 (2016)
Makarov, G.: Estimates for the distribution function of a sum of two random variables when the marginal distributions are fixed. Theory Probab. Appl. 26(4), 803–806 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1137/1126086
Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J. Financ. 7(1), 77–91 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x
Markowitz, H.: Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Yale University Press, New Haven (1959). https://doi.org/10.2307/2975974
McNeil, A.J., Frey, R., Embrechts, P.: Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2015)
Meskarian, R., Xu, H., Fliege, J.: Numerical methods for stochastic programs with second order dominance constraints with applications to portfolio optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 216(2), 376–385 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.044
Nelsen, R.B.: An Introduction to Copulas. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3076-0
Pflug, G.C.: Some remarks on the value-at-risk and the conditional value-at-risk. In: Probabilistic Constrained Optimization, pp. 272–281. Springer, US (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3150-7
Pflug, G.C., Pichler, A.: Approximations for Probability Distributions and Stochastic Optimization Problems. In: Consigli, G., Dempster, M., Bertocchi, M. (eds.) Springer Handbook on Stochastic Optimization Methods in Finance and Energy, International Series in OR and Management Science, vol. 163, pp. 343–387. Springer (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9586-5
Pflug, G.C., Pichler, A.: Multistage Stochastic Optimization. Springer, Berlin (2014)
Pflug, G.C., Pichler, A., Wozabal, D.: The 1/n investment strategy is optimal under high model ambiguity. J. Bank. Financ. 36(2), 410–417 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.07.018
Pflug, G.C., Römisch, W.: Modeling, measuring and managing risk, vol. 190. World Scientific, Singapore (2007). https://doi.org/10.1142/6478
Pflug, G.C., Wozabal, D.: Ambiguity in portfolio selection. Quant. Finan. 7 (4), 435–442 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/14697680701455410
Puccetti, G., Rüschendorf, L.: Computation of sharp bounds on the distribution of a function of dependent risks. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 236(7), 1833–1840 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2011.10.015
Puccetti, G., Wang, R.: Extremal dependence concepts. Stat. Sci. 30(4), 485–517 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1214/15-STS525
Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S.: Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2, 21–42 (2000). https://doi.org/10.21314/JOR.2000.038
Rüschendorf, L.: Random variables with maximum sums. Adv. Appl. Probab. 14(3), 623–632 (1982). https://doi.org/10.2307/1426677
Rüschendorf, L.: Mathematical Risk Analysis. Springer, Berlin (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33590-7
Rüschendorf, L.: Risk Bounds and Partial Dependence Information. Preprint, University of Freiburg (2016)
Shorack, G.R., Wellner, J.A.: Empirical processes with applications to statistics, vol. 59 Siam (2009). https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898719017
Steinbach, M.C.: Markowitz revisited: mean-variance models in financial portfolio analysis. SIAM Rev. 43(1), 31–85 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144500376650
Tintner, G.: The theory of choice under subjective risk and uncertainty. Econometrica: J. Econ. Soc. 9(3/4), 298–304 (1941). https://doi.org/10.2307/1907198
Wang, B., Wang, R.: The complete mixability and convex minimization problems with monotone marginal densities. J. Multivar. Anal. 102(10), 1344–1360 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2011.05.002
Wang, B., Wang, R.: Extreme negative dependence and risk aggregation. J. Multivar. Anal. 136, 12–25 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2015.01.006
Wang, S.: Premium calculation by transforming the layer premium density. ASTIN Bulletin: J. IAA 26(1), 71–92 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2143/AST.26.1.563234
Wets, R.: Programming under uncertainty: the complete problem. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete 4(4), 316–339 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00539117
Wozabal, D.: A framework for optimization under ambiguity. Ann. Oper. Res. 193(1), 21–47 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0812-0
Xu, H., Zhang, D.: Monte carlo methods for mean-risk optimization and portfolio selection. Comput. Manag. Sci. 9(1), 3–29 (2012)
Acknowledgments
Open access funding provided by University of Vienna. The authors acknowledge support by the Vienna Science and Technologie Fund (WWTF) through project MA14-008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Pflug, G.C., Pohl, M. A Review on Ambiguity in Stochastic Portfolio Optimization. Set-Valued Var. Anal 26, 733–757 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11228-017-0458-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11228-017-0458-z