Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation about a screening step in model selection

  • Published:
Statistics and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many studies a large number of variables is measured and the identification of relevant variables influencing an outcome is an important task. For variable selection several procedures are available. However, focusing on one model only neglects that there usually exist other equally appropriate models. Bayesian or frequentist model averaging approaches have been proposed to improve the development of a predictor. With a larger number of variables (say more than ten variables) the resulting class of models can be very large. For Bayesian model averaging Occam’s window is a popular approach to reduce the model space. As this approach may not eliminate any variables, a variable screening step was proposed for a frequentist model averaging procedure. Based on the results of selected models in bootstrap samples, variables are eliminated before deriving a model averaging predictor. As a simple alternative screening procedure backward elimination can be used.

Through two examples and by means of simulation we investigate some properties of the screening step. In the simulation study we consider situations with fifteen and 25 variables, respectively, of which seven have an influence on the outcome. With the screening step most of the uninfluential variables will be eliminated, but also some variables with a weak effect. Variable screening leads to more applicable models without eliminating models, which are more strongly supported by the data. Furthermore, we give recommendations for important parameters of the screening step.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H.: Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov, B., Csaki, B. (eds.) Second International Symposium on Information Theory, pp. 267–281. Academiai Kiado, Budapest (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustin, N.H., Sauerbrei, W., Schumacher, M.: The practical utility of incorporating model selection uncertainty into prognostic models for survival data. Stat. Model. 5, 95–118 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz, A., Sauerbrei, W., Holländer, N.: On properties of predictors derived with a two-step bootstrap model averaging approach—a simulation study in the linear regression model. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. (2007, in press)

  • Buckland, S.T., Burnham, K.P., Augustin, N.H.: Model selection: an integral part of inference. Biometrics 53, 603–618 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R.: Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information Theoretic Approach. Springer, New York (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R.: Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol. Methods Res. 33, 261–304 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield, C.: Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 158, 419–466 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, D.: Assessment and propagation of model selection uncertainty (with) discussion. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57, 45–97 (1995)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, F.E.J.: Regression Modeling Strategies. Springer, New York (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeting, J.A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A.E., Volinsky, C.T.: Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial (with discussion). Stat. Sci. 14, 382–417 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Holländer, N., Sauerbrei, W., Schumacher, M.: Confidence intervals for the effect of a prognostic factor after selection of an ‘optimal’ cutpoint. Stat. Med. 23, 1701–1713 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holländer, N., Augustin, N.H., Sauerbrei, W.: Investigation on the improvement of prediction by bootstrap model averaging. Methods Inf. Med. 45, 44–50 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S.: Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.W.: Fitting percentage of body fat to simple body measurements. J. Stat. Educ. 4 (1996)

  • Kuha, J.: AIC and BIC: Comparison of assumptions and performance. Sociol. Methods Res. 33, 188–229 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, N.: Why stepdown procedures in variable selection. Technometrics 12, 621–625 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery, A.E.: Bayesian model selection in social research (with discussion). Sociol. Methodol. 25, 111–195 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauerbrei, W.: The use of resampling methods to simplify regression models in medical statistics. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C 48, 313–329 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sauerbrei, W., Schumacher, M.: A boostrap resampling procedure for model building: application to the Cox regression model. Stat. Med. 11, 2093–2109 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G.: Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6, 461–464 (1978)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta, T., Mellin, I.: Model selection criteria and model selection tests in regression models. Scand. J. Stat. 13, 159–171 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, J.C., Altman, D.G.: Prognostic models: clinically useful or quickly forgotten? Br. Med. J. 311, 1539–1541 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Willi Sauerbrei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sauerbrei, W., Holländer, N. & Buchholz, A. Investigation about a screening step in model selection. Stat Comput 18, 195–208 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-007-9048-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-007-9048-5

Keywords

Navigation