Abstract
In this essay I explore the potential that ethnographic methods hold for philosophy of education as a form of critical pragmatism. An aim of critical pragmatism is to help to analyze the roadblocks to fruitful communication, coordination and liberation. It does so by identifying their sources and opportunities for repair. As I have argued elsewhere (Feinberg in Eur J Pragmatism Am Philos 4(1):222–240, 2012) an important aim of critical pragmatism is to redirect expert knowledge so it takes seriously local understanding. In this essay I do two things. First I look at the other side of critical pragmatism showing how, by adopting ethnographic methods, critical pragmatism can be used to refine and expand local, common sense understanding. Second I show how philosophers can draw on ethnography to understand the ways in which normative issues are felt, defined and creatively resolved on the local level, and how they can in turn use that understanding to provide some general guidelines for addressing educational problems. I show how critical pragmatism can aid education by displaying and thematizing the innovative solutions that people, caught between different normative imperatives, devise to maintain an inclusive, educationally meaningful environment. In this part I draw on my work in a Catholic school to illustrate how ethnography can be used by philosophy to capture innovative resolutions to conflicts of value and I show how philosophy can then serve to thematize these resolutions by appropriating more general categories for addressing similar educational concerns.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The first view is the one that James took. The second belongs more to Peirce. In my reading Dewey failed to come to grips with the difference and vacillated between them.
My appreciation to Terri Wilson for pointing this out in this way.
References
Apple, M. W. (1982). Education and power. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Behar, R., & Gordon, D. A. (Eds.). (1995). Women writing culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Biesta, G. J. J., & Burbules, N. C. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D. C. Heath.
Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and nature. Chicago: Open Court.
Dewey, J. (1988). Human nature and conduct: 1922. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Feinberg, W. (2006). For goodness sake: Religious schools and education for democratic citizenry. New York: Routledge.
Feinberg, W. (2012). Critical pragmatism: The reconstruction of science and values in educational research. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 4(1), 222–240.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
Freire, P. (1968). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interest. Boston: Beacon.
MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
McDermott, R. (1997). Achieving school failure in (Spindler, ed.) education and cultural processes. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Willis, P. (1978). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. England: Saxon House.
Wolfe, J. (2012). Does pragmatism have a theory of power. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 4(1), 120–137.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feinberg, W. Critical Pragmatism and the Appropriation of Ethnography by Philosophy of Education. Stud Philos Educ 34, 149–157 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9415-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9415-6