Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Empty signifiers, education and politics

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper assumes that education is part of the process of discursive construction of society. The theoretical framework on which this argument is based includes Ernesto Laclau’s theory of the “ontological impossibility and political necessity of society”, and the role discourse and empty signifiers play in the establishment of political identities. Laclau’s theory is supplemented here by ideas of Derrida, Lacan, Žižek and Marx, and by other traits in contemporary semiotics that relate to the notion of “the void” in semantic systems. My claim is that empty signifiers, crucial to the production of the totality of society, are discursively produced, among others, in pedagogical debates. This is illustrated by one historical example (Rouuseau), which gives ground for more contemporary analyses, and on the basis of the present economic discourse of educating and the idea of “knowledge society”. The main conclusion is that education, in contemporary discourse of learning, becomes a neurotic symptom of the lack of overt domination in social relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In Allgemeine Paedagogik aus der Zweck der Erziehung Abgeleitetet,considered to lay a foundation for pedagogy as independent academic discipline, J.F.Herbart grounds pedagogy in ethics, whence he roots educational goals, and psychology, which is to provide for instruments of upbringing and instruction (Herbart, 1876).

  2. Of course there is no logical ground for this conclusion. It is a substitution that reflects the dominant role that economy plays in public discourse of Western societies, and therefore a mere act of discourse colonisation (Leitch and Roper, 1998, Fine and Green, 2000).

References

  • Baczko, B. (1964). Rousseau: Samotnośći wspólnota. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, B. (2001). In perpetual motion. Theories of power, educational history and the child. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes, and control. Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reprodukcja, elementy teorii systemu nauczania. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coclough, C. (1996). Education and the market: Which parts of the neoliberal solution are correct? World Development, 24(4), 589–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Social justice in education. In M. Kalantzis (Ed.), A Fair Go in Education (pp. 4–10). Canberra: Australian Curriculum Studies Association and Australian Centre for Equity in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1997). Nietzsche i filozofia. Transl. Bogdan Banasiak. Warszawa: Spacja.

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1991). Qu’est-ce que la philosophie? Paris: Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). Anti-Oedipus. Capitalism and schizophrenia.Transl. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem, and Helen R.Lane. Continuum, London – New York.

  • Derrida, J. (1982). Differance. In: Margins of philosophy, transl. Alan Bass, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  • Derrida, J. (1992). Farmakon. In: Pismo filozofii. Transl. Bogdan Banasiak. Inter esse, Krakow.

  • Derrida, J. (1999). χωςά/ Chora. Transl. Maria Gołebiewska. KR, Warszawa.

  • Derrida, J. (1999a). O gramatologii. Warszawa: Transl. Bogdan Banasiak, KR.

  • Eco, U. (1996). Nieobecna struktura. Warszawa: KR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1997). The semantics of metaphor. In Robert E.Innis (Ed.), Semiotics. An introductory anthology. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

  • Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhart, C., & Cantisano Terra, B. R. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B., & Green, F. (2000). Economics, social capital, and the colonization of the social sciences. In S. Baron, J. Field & T. Schulter (Eds.), Social capital. Critical perspectives (pp. 78–93). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B. (1995). The Lacanian Subject. Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and and Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1993). Nadzorowć i karać : narodziny więzienia Transl. Tadeusz Komendant.Warszawa: Aletheia: Spacja.

  • FP6 Specific Programme “Integrating and Strengthening the European Research Area”, Priority 7: Citizens and Governance in a knowledge based society. Work Programme 2002–2003, available at http://cordis.europa.eu/fp6/dc/index.cfm?fuseaction=UserSite.CitizensDetailsCallPage &call_id=12.

  • Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition? A political – philosophical exchange. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein, M. (2000). An economic rationale for public education: the value of commitment. Journal of Monetary Economics 45.

  • Gradsteinm, M., & Justman, M. (2000). Human capital, social capital and public schooling. European Economic Review No. 44.

  • Herbart, J. F. (1876). Allgemeine Pädagogik und Umriss pädagogischer Vorlefungen Leipzig : Verl. von Siegismund u. Volkening.

  • Hult, H., Handal, G., Lababidi, & T., Cackowska, M, eds. (2004). Understanding the Transition from Higher Education to Work Life. A Report of project HPSE CT-2001–00068 Students as Journeymen between Communities of Higher Education and Work. European Commission Fifth Framework Programme.

  • Jacyno, M. (1997). Kontrkultura ubóstwa. Pierre’a Bourdieu koncepcja reprodukcji klas społecznych a problem reprodukcji otwartej. Studia Socjologiczne, 3(146), 101–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (2006). Ecrits: a selection. Translated by Alan Sheridan. London and New York, Routledge.

  • Laclau, E (1996). Why do empty signifiers matter to politics. In: Emancipations. Verso, London.

  • Laclau, E. (1990). New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1996). Emancipation(s). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitch, S., & Roper J. (1998). Genre colonization as a strategy: A frmework for research and practice. Public Relations Review, 24(2), 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marciszewski, W., ed. (1970). Mała encyklopedia logiki. Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków. Zakład Narodowy Imienia Ossolińskich.

  • Marx, K. (1967), Capital. Transl. Ernest Untermann, New York: International Publishers.

  • Philips, D. (2005). Economics as ideological fantasy. Dispensability of man by way of changing the nature of ideas. International Journal of Applied Semiotics, 4(2), 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1973). Objective knowledge : an evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1762 / 1979). Emile or on education. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1762 / 2006). The Social Contract. On Principles of Political Right. Transl. G. D. H. Cole, public domain. http://www.constitution.org/jjr/socon.htm.

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1966). Umowa społeczna oraz Uwagi o rządzie polskim. [...] Warszawa: PWN (includes Polish translation of The Social Contract and The Government of Poland.)

  • Schultz, T. W. (1981). Investing in People. The Economics of Population Quality. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szkudlarek, T. (2001). Ekonomia i etyka. Przemieszczenia dyskursu edukacyjnego. Teraźniejszość, człowiek, edukacja, numer specjalny, 165–191.

  • Szkudlarek, T. (2003). Educational theory, displacement and hegemony. International Journal of Applied Semiotics, 4(2), 109–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szkudlarek, T. (2005). On Nations and Children. Rousseau, Poland, and European Identity. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 24, 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Lisbon European Council (2000) – An Agenda for Economic and Social Renewal of Europe. Contribution of the European Commission to the Special European Council in Lisbon, 23–24 March 2000. Brussels, DOC/00/7, available at http://www.euractiv.com/en/agenda2004/lisbon-agenda/article-117510.

  • Thomson, P. (2002). Schooling the Rustbelt Kids. Making a difference in changing times. Stroke on Trent, Trentham Books.

  • Trifonas, P. (2000). Derrida and Rousseau. Deconstructing the ethics of a pedagogy of the supplement. The Review of Education / Pedagogy / Cultural Studies, 22(3), 243–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G. (1997). Creating quasi-markets in education. A review of recent research on parental choice and school autonomy in three countries. In M. Apple (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, vol.22. Washington D.C., AERA, pp. 3–47.

  • Žižek, S. (2001). Wzniosły obiekt ideologii. Wrocław, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego (Polish translation of The sublime object of ideology, London, Verso, 1989.)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomasz Szkudlarek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szkudlarek, T. Empty signifiers, education and politics. Stud Philos Educ 26, 237–252 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9033-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9033-7

Keywords

Navigation